-
Minimizing Instability in Strategy-Proof Matching Mechanism Using A Linear Programming Approach
Authors:
Tohya Sugano
Abstract:
In this paper we address the design of matching mechanisms that are strategy-proof and simultaneously as stable as possible. Building on the impossibility result by \cite{Roth1982-cl} for one-to-one matching problems, we formulate an optimization problem that maximizes stability under the constraint of strategy-proofness. In our model the objective is to minimize the degree of instability measured…
▽ More
In this paper we address the design of matching mechanisms that are strategy-proof and simultaneously as stable as possible. Building on the impossibility result by \cite{Roth1982-cl} for one-to-one matching problems, we formulate an optimization problem that maximizes stability under the constraint of strategy-proofness. In our model the objective is to minimize the degree of instability measured as the sum (or worst-case maximum) of stability violations over all preference profiles. We further introduce the socially important properties of anonymity and symmetry into the formulation.
Our computational results show that, for small markets, our optimization approach leads to mechanisms with substantially lower stability violations than RSD. In particular, the optimal mechanism under our formulation exhibits roughly one-third the stability violation of RSD.
For deterministic mechanisms in the three-agent case, we also find that any strategy-proof mechanism hvae at least two blocking pairs at the worst case, and we propose an algorithm that attains this lower bound. Finally, we discuss extensions to larger markets and present simulation evidence that our mechanism yields a reduction of approximately $0.25$ blocking pairs on average compared to SD mechanism.
△ Less
Submitted 17 February, 2025;
originally announced February 2025.
-
A Note on Identification of Match Fixed Effects as Interpretable Unobserved Match Affinity
Authors:
Suguru Otani,
Tohya Sugano
Abstract:
We highlight that match fixed effects, represented by the coefficients of interaction terms involving dummy variables for two elements, lack identification without specific restrictions on parameters. Consequently, the coefficients typically reported as relative match fixed effects by statistical software are not interpretable. To address this, we establish normalization conditions that enable ide…
▽ More
We highlight that match fixed effects, represented by the coefficients of interaction terms involving dummy variables for two elements, lack identification without specific restrictions on parameters. Consequently, the coefficients typically reported as relative match fixed effects by statistical software are not interpretable. To address this, we establish normalization conditions that enable identification of match fixed effect parameters as interpretable indicators of unobserved match affinity, facilitating comparisons among observed matches. Using data from middle school students in the 2007 Trends in International Mathematics and Science Study (TIMSS), we highlight the distribution of comparable match fixed effects within a specific school.
△ Less
Submitted 20 August, 2024; v1 submitted 27 June, 2024;
originally announced June 2024.
-
Calculating the linear response functions of non-interacting electrons by the time-dependent Schroedinger equation
Authors:
Toshiaki Iitaka,
Shintaro Nomura,
Hideki Hirayama,
Xinwei Zhao,
Yoshinobu Aoyagi,
Takuo Sugano
Abstract:
An O(N) algorithm is proposed for calculating linear response functions of non-interacting electrons in arbitray potential. This algorithm is based on numerical solution of the time-dependent Schroedinger equation discretized in space, and suitable to parallel- and vector- computation. Since it avoids O(N^3) computational effort of matrix diagonalization, it requires only O(N) computational effo…
▽ More
An O(N) algorithm is proposed for calculating linear response functions of non-interacting electrons in arbitray potential. This algorithm is based on numerical solution of the time-dependent Schroedinger equation discretized in space, and suitable to parallel- and vector- computation. Since it avoids O(N^3) computational effort of matrix diagonalization, it requires only O(N) computational effort where N is the dimension of the statevector.
This O(N) algorithm is very effective for systems consisting of thousands of atoms, since otherwise we have to calculate large number of eigenstates, i.e., the occupied one-electron states up to the Fermi energy and the unoccupied states with higher energy.
The advantage of this method compared to the Chebyshev polynomial method recently developed by Wang (L.W. Wang, Phys. Rev. B49, 10154 (1994);L.W. Wang, Phys. Rev. Lett. 73, 1039 (1994)) is that our method can calculate linear response functions without any storage of huge statevectors on external storage. Therefore it can treat much larger systems.
△ Less
Submitted 5 May, 1997; v1 submitted 26 March, 1997;
originally announced March 1997.
