Unfair and Anomalous Evolutionary Dynamics from Fluctuating Payoffs
Authors:
Frank Stollmeier,
Jan Nagler
Abstract:
Evolution occurs in populations of reproducing individuals. Reproduction depends on the payoff a strategy receives. The payoff depends on the environment that may change over time, on intrinsic uncertainties, and on other sources of randomness. These temporal variations in the payoffs can affect which traits evolve. Understanding evolutionary game dynamics that are affected by varying payoffs rema…
▽ More
Evolution occurs in populations of reproducing individuals. Reproduction depends on the payoff a strategy receives. The payoff depends on the environment that may change over time, on intrinsic uncertainties, and on other sources of randomness. These temporal variations in the payoffs can affect which traits evolve. Understanding evolutionary game dynamics that are affected by varying payoffs remains difficult. Here we study the impact of arbitrary amplitudes and covariances of temporally varying payoffs on the dynamics. The evolutionary dynamics may be "unfair", meaning that, on average, two coexisting strategies may persistently receive different payoffs. This mechanism can induce an anomalous coexistence of cooperators and defectors in the Prisoner's Dilemma, and an unexpected selection reversal in the Hawk-Dove game.
△ Less
Submitted 1 February, 2018;
originally announced February 2018.
Sustainable computational science: the ReScience initiative
Authors:
Nicolas P. Rougier,
Konrad Hinsen,
Frédéric Alexandre,
Thomas Arildsen,
Lorena Barba,
Fabien C. Y. Benureau,
C. Titus Brown,
Pierre de Buyl,
Ozan Caglayan,
Andrew P. Davison,
Marc André Delsuc,
Georgios Detorakis,
Alexandra K. Diem,
Damien Drix,
Pierre Enel,
Benoît Girard,
Olivia Guest,
Matt G. Hall,
Rafael Neto Henriques,
Xavier Hinaut,
Kamil S Jaron,
Mehdi Khamassi,
Almar Klein,
Tiina Manninen,
Pietro Marchesi
, et al. (20 additional authors not shown)
Abstract:
Computer science offers a large set of tools for prototyping, writing, running, testing, validating, sharing and reproducing results, however computational science lags behind. In the best case, authors may provide their source code as a compressed archive and they may feel confident their research is reproducible. But this is not exactly true. James Buckheit and David Donoho proposed more than tw…
▽ More
Computer science offers a large set of tools for prototyping, writing, running, testing, validating, sharing and reproducing results, however computational science lags behind. In the best case, authors may provide their source code as a compressed archive and they may feel confident their research is reproducible. But this is not exactly true. James Buckheit and David Donoho proposed more than two decades ago that an article about computational results is advertising, not scholarship. The actual scholarship is the full software environment, code, and data that produced the result. This implies new workflows, in particular in peer-reviews. Existing journals have been slow to adapt: source codes are rarely requested, hardly ever actually executed to check that they produce the results advertised in the article. ReScience is a peer-reviewed journal that targets computational research and encourages the explicit replication of already published research, promoting new and open-source implementations in order to ensure that the original research can be replicated from its description. To achieve this goal, the whole publishing chain is radically different from other traditional scientific journals. ReScience resides on GitHub where each new implementation of a computational study is made available together with comments, explanations, and software tests.
△ Less
Submitted 11 November, 2017; v1 submitted 14 July, 2017;
originally announced July 2017.
Possible Origin of Stagnation and Variability of Earth's Biodiversity
Authors:
Frank Stollmeier,
Theo Geisel,
Jan Nagler
Abstract:
The magnitude and variability of Earth's biodiversity have puzzled scientists ever since paleontologic fossil databases became available. We identify and study a model of interdependent species where both endogenous and exogenous impacts determine the nonstationary extinction dynamics. The framework provides an explanation for the qualitative difference of marine and continental biodiversity growt…
▽ More
The magnitude and variability of Earth's biodiversity have puzzled scientists ever since paleontologic fossil databases became available. We identify and study a model of interdependent species where both endogenous and exogenous impacts determine the nonstationary extinction dynamics. The framework provides an explanation for the qualitative difference of marine and continental biodiversity growth. In particular, the stagnation of marine biodiversity may result from a global transition from an imbalanced to a balanced state of the species dependency network. The predictions of our framework are in agreement with paleontologic databases.
△ Less
Submitted 9 October, 2014;
originally announced October 2014.
