-
Benchmarking the Security Protocol and Data Model (SPDM) for component authentication
Authors:
Renan C. A. Alves,
Bruno C. Albertini,
Marcos A. Simplicio Jr
Abstract:
Efforts to secure computing systems via software traditionally focus on the operating system and application levels. In contrast, the Security Protocol and Data Model (SPDM) tackles firmware level security challenges, which are much harder (if at all possible) to detect with regular protection software. SPDM includes key features like enabling peripheral authentication, authenticated hardware meas…
▽ More
Efforts to secure computing systems via software traditionally focus on the operating system and application levels. In contrast, the Security Protocol and Data Model (SPDM) tackles firmware level security challenges, which are much harder (if at all possible) to detect with regular protection software. SPDM includes key features like enabling peripheral authentication, authenticated hardware measurements retrieval, and secure session establishment. Since SPDM is a relatively recent proposal, there is a lack of studies evaluating its performance impact on real-world applications. In this article, we address this gap by: (1) implementing the protocol on a simple virtual device, and then investigating the overhead introduced by each SDPM message; and (2) creating an SPDM-capable virtual hard drive based on VirtIO, and comparing the resulting read/write performance with a regular, unsecured implementation. Our results suggest that SPDM bootstrap time takes the order of tens of milliseconds, while the toll of introducing SPDM on hard drive communication highly depends on specific workload patterns. For example, for mixed random read/write operations, the slowdown is negligible in comparison to the baseline unsecured setup. Conversely, for sequential read or write operations, the data encryption process becomes the bottleneck, reducing the performance indicators by several orders of magnitude.
△ Less
Submitted 12 July, 2023;
originally announced July 2023.
-
Randomization and Fair Judgment in Law and Science
Authors:
Julio Michael Stern,
Marcos Antonio Simplicio,
Marcos Vinicius M. Silva,
Roberto A. Castellanos Pfeiffer
Abstract:
Randomization procedures are used in legal and statistical applications, aiming to shield important decisions from spurious influences. This article gives an intuitive introduction to randomization and examines some intended consequences of its use related to truthful statistical inference and fair legal judgment. This article also presents an open-code Java implementation for a cryptographically…
▽ More
Randomization procedures are used in legal and statistical applications, aiming to shield important decisions from spurious influences. This article gives an intuitive introduction to randomization and examines some intended consequences of its use related to truthful statistical inference and fair legal judgment. This article also presents an open-code Java implementation for a cryptographically secure, statistically reliable, transparent, traceable, and fully auditable randomization tool.
△ Less
Submitted 18 December, 2020; v1 submitted 15 August, 2020;
originally announced August 2020.
-
A Fair, Traceable, Auditable and Participatory Randomization Tool for Legal Systems
Authors:
Marcos Vinicius M. Silva,
Marcos Antonio Simplicio Jr.,
Roberto Augusto Castellanos Pfeiffer,
Julio Michael Stern
Abstract:
Many real-world scenarios require the random selection of one or more individuals from a pool of eligible candidates. One example of especial social relevance refers to the legal system, in which the jurors and judges are commonly picked according to some probability distribution aiming to avoid biased decisions. In this scenario, ensuring auditability of the random drawing procedure is imperative…
▽ More
Many real-world scenarios require the random selection of one or more individuals from a pool of eligible candidates. One example of especial social relevance refers to the legal system, in which the jurors and judges are commonly picked according to some probability distribution aiming to avoid biased decisions. In this scenario, ensuring auditability of the random drawing procedure is imperative to promote confidence in its fairness. With this goal in mind, this article describes a protocol for random drawings specially designed for use in legal systems. The proposed design combines the following properties: security by design, ensuring the fairness of the random draw as long as at least one participant behaves honestly; auditability by any interested party, even those having no technical background, using only public information; and statistical robustness, supporting drawings where candidates may have distinct probability distributions. Moreover, it is capable of inviting and engaging as participating stakeholders the main interested parties of a legal process, in a way that promotes process transparency, public trust and institutional resilience. An open-source implementation is also provided as supplementary material.
△ Less
Submitted 4 June, 2020;
originally announced June 2020.
