Showing 1–2 of 2 results for author: Silva, M V M

Randomization and Fair Judgment in Law and Science

Authors: Julio Michael Stern, Marcos Antonio Simplicio, Marcos Vinicius M. Silva, Roberto A. Castellanos Pfeiffer

Abstract: Randomization procedures are used in legal and statistical applications, aiming to shield important decisions from spurious influences. This article gives an intuitive introduction to randomization and examines some intended consequences of its use related to truthful statistical inference and fair legal judgment. This article also presents an open-code Java implementation for a cryptographically… ▽ More Randomization procedures are used in legal and statistical applications, aiming to shield important decisions from spurious influences. This article gives an intuitive introduction to randomization and examines some intended consequences of its use related to truthful statistical inference and fair legal judgment. This article also presents an open-code Java implementation for a cryptographically secure, statistically reliable, transparent, traceable, and fully auditable randomization tool. △ Less

Submitted 18 December, 2020; v1 submitted 15 August, 2020; originally announced August 2020.

Comments: p.399-418 in Jose Acacio de Barros and Decio Krause, eds. (2020). A True Polymath: A Tribute to Francisco Antonio Doria. Rickmansworth, UK: College Publications. ISBN: 978-1-84890-351-7

Report number: ISBN: 978-1-84890-351-7 ACM Class: G.3; G.4; E.3; K.4; K.5

A Fair, Traceable, Auditable and Participatory Randomization Tool for Legal Systems

Authors: Marcos Vinicius M. Silva, Marcos Antonio Simplicio Jr., Roberto Augusto Castellanos Pfeiffer, Julio Michael Stern

Abstract: Many real-world scenarios require the random selection of one or more individuals from a pool of eligible candidates. One example of especial social relevance refers to the legal system, in which the jurors and judges are commonly picked according to some probability distribution aiming to avoid biased decisions. In this scenario, ensuring auditability of the random drawing procedure is imperative… ▽ More Many real-world scenarios require the random selection of one or more individuals from a pool of eligible candidates. One example of especial social relevance refers to the legal system, in which the jurors and judges are commonly picked according to some probability distribution aiming to avoid biased decisions. In this scenario, ensuring auditability of the random drawing procedure is imperative to promote confidence in its fairness. With this goal in mind, this article describes a protocol for random drawings specially designed for use in legal systems. The proposed design combines the following properties: security by design, ensuring the fairness of the random draw as long as at least one participant behaves honestly; auditability by any interested party, even those having no technical background, using only public information; and statistical robustness, supporting drawings where candidates may have distinct probability distributions. Moreover, it is capable of inviting and engaging as participating stakeholders the main interested parties of a legal process, in a way that promotes process transparency, public trust and institutional resilience. An open-source implementation is also provided as supplementary material. △ Less

Submitted 4 June, 2020; originally announced June 2020.

MSC Class: 64-04 (Primary); 62D99 (Secondary)