-
Robust Social Welfare Maximization via Information Design in Linear-Quadratic-Gaussian Games
Authors:
Furkan Sezer,
Ceyhun Eksin
Abstract:
Information design in an incomplete information game includes a designer with the goal of influencing players' actions through signals generated from a designed probability distribution so that its objective function is optimized. We consider a setting in which the designer has partial knowledge on agents' utilities. We address the uncertainty about players' preferences by formulating a robust inf…
▽ More
Information design in an incomplete information game includes a designer with the goal of influencing players' actions through signals generated from a designed probability distribution so that its objective function is optimized. We consider a setting in which the designer has partial knowledge on agents' utilities. We address the uncertainty about players' preferences by formulating a robust information design problem against worst case payoffs. If the players have quadratic payoffs that depend on the players' actions and an unknown payoff-relevant state, and signals on the state that follow a Gaussian distribution conditional on the state realization, then the information design problem under quadratic design objectives is a semidefinite program (SDP). Specifically, we consider ellipsoid perturbations over payoff coefficients in linear-quadratic-Gaussian (LQG) games. We show that this leads to a tractable robust SDP formulation. Numerical studies are carried out to identify the relation between the perturbation levels and the optimal information structures.
△ Less
Submitted 28 April, 2023; v1 submitted 9 March, 2023;
originally announced March 2023.
-
Information Preferences of Individual Agents in Linear-Quadratic-Gaussian Network Games
Authors:
Furkan Sezer,
Ceyhun Eksin
Abstract:
We consider linear-quadratic-Gaussian (LQG) network games in which agents have quadratic payoffs that depend on their individual and neighbors' actions, and an unknown payoff-relevant state. An information designer determines the fidelity of information revealed to the agents about the payoff state to maximize the social welfare. Prior results show that full information disclosure is optimal under…
▽ More
We consider linear-quadratic-Gaussian (LQG) network games in which agents have quadratic payoffs that depend on their individual and neighbors' actions, and an unknown payoff-relevant state. An information designer determines the fidelity of information revealed to the agents about the payoff state to maximize the social welfare. Prior results show that full information disclosure is optimal under certain assumptions on the payoffs, i.e., it is beneficial for the average individual. In this paper, we provide conditions based on the strength of the dependence of payoffs on neighbors' actions, i.e., competition, under which a rational agent is expected to benefit, i.e., receive higher payoffs, from full information disclosure. We find that all agents benefit from information disclosure for the star network structure when the game is symmetric and submodular or supermodular. We also identify that the central agent benefits more than a peripheral agent from full information disclosure unless the competition is strong and the number of peripheral agents is small enough. Despite the fact that all agents expect to benefit from information disclosure ex-ante, a central agent can be worse-off from information disclosure in many realizations of the payoff state under strong competition, indicating that a risk-averse central agent can prefer uninformative signals ex-ante.
△ Less
Submitted 24 March, 2022;
originally announced March 2022.
-
Maximizing Social Welfare and Agreement via Information Design in Linear-Quadratic-Gaussian Games
Authors:
Furkan Sezer,
Hossein Khazaei,
Ceyhun Eksin
Abstract:
We consider linear-quadratic Gaussian (LQG) games in which players have quadratic payoffs that depend on the players' actions and an unknown payoff-relevant state, and signals on the state that follow a Gaussian distribution conditional on the state realization. An information designer decides the fidelity of information revealed to the players in order to maximize the social welfare of the player…
▽ More
We consider linear-quadratic Gaussian (LQG) games in which players have quadratic payoffs that depend on the players' actions and an unknown payoff-relevant state, and signals on the state that follow a Gaussian distribution conditional on the state realization. An information designer decides the fidelity of information revealed to the players in order to maximize the social welfare of the players or reduce the disagreement among players' actions. Leveraging the semi-definiteness of the information design problem, we derive analytical solutions for these objectives under specific LQG games. We show that full information disclosure maximizes social welfare when there is a common payoff-relevant state, when there is strategic substitutability in the actions of players, or when the signals are public. Numerical results show that as strategic substitution increases, the value of the information disclosure increases. When the objective is to induce conformity among players' actions, hiding information is optimal. Lastly, we consider the information design objective that is a weighted combination of social welfare and cohesiveness of players' actions. We obtain an interval for the weights where full information disclosure is optimal under public signals for games with strategic substitutability. Numerical solutions show that the actual interval where full information disclosure is optimal gets close to the analytical interval obtained as substitution increases.
△ Less
Submitted 26 February, 2023; v1 submitted 25 February, 2021;
originally announced February 2021.
-
An Iterative Mechanism for Coupling Electricity Markets
Authors:
Alfredo Garcia,
Roohallah Khatami,
Ceyhun Eksin,
Furkan Sezer
Abstract:
The coordinated operation of interconnected but locally controlled electricity markets is generally referred to as a "coupling". In this paper we propose a new mechanism design for efficient coupling of independent electricity markets. The mechanism operates after each individual market has settled (e.g. hour-ahead) and based upon the reported supply and demand functions for internal market optimi…
▽ More
The coordinated operation of interconnected but locally controlled electricity markets is generally referred to as a "coupling". In this paper we propose a new mechanism design for efficient coupling of independent electricity markets. The mechanism operates after each individual market has settled (e.g. hour-ahead) and based upon the reported supply and demand functions for internal market optimization (clearing), each market operator is asked to iteratively quote the terms of energy trade (on behalf of the agents participating in its market) across the transmission lines connecting to other markets. The mechanism is scalable as the informational demands placed on each market operator at each iteration are limited. We show that the mechanism's outcome converges to the optimal flows between markets given the reported supply and demand functions from each individual market clearing. We show the proposed market coupling design does not alter the structure of incentives in each internal market, i.e., any internal market equilibrium will remain so (approximately) after coupling is implemented. This is achieved via incentive transfers (updated at each iteration) that remunerate each market with its marginal contribution (i.e. cost savings) to all other participating markets. We identify a sufficient condition on a uniform participation fee for each market operator ensuring the mechanism incurs no deficit. The proposed decentralized mechanism is implemented on the three-area IEEE Reliability Test System where the simulation results showcase the efficiency of proposed model.
△ Less
Submitted 12 January, 2021; v1 submitted 17 November, 2020;
originally announced November 2020.
