-
Digital N-of-1 Trials and their Application in Experimental Physiology
Authors:
Stefan Konigorski,
Mathias Ried-Larsen,
Christopher H Schmid
Abstract:
Traditionally, studies in experimental physiology have been conducted in small groups of human participants, animal models or cell lines. Identifying optimal study designs that achieve sufficient power for drawing proper statistical inferences to detect group level effects with small sample sizes has been challenging. Moreover, average effects derived from traditional group-level inference do not…
▽ More
Traditionally, studies in experimental physiology have been conducted in small groups of human participants, animal models or cell lines. Identifying optimal study designs that achieve sufficient power for drawing proper statistical inferences to detect group level effects with small sample sizes has been challenging. Moreover, average effects derived from traditional group-level inference do not necessarily apply to individual participants. Here, we introduce N-of-1 trials as an innovative study design that can be used to draw valid statistical inference about the effects of interventions on individual participants and can be aggregated across multiple study participants to provide population-level inferences more efficiently than standard group randomized trials. In this manuscript, we introduce the key components and design features of N-of-1 trials, describe statistical analysis and interpretations of the results, and describe some available digital tools to facilitate their use using examples from experimental physiology.
△ Less
Submitted 22 February, 2025; v1 submitted 19 December, 2024;
originally announced December 2024.
-
Meta-analysis models relaxing the random effects normality assumption: methodological systematic review and simulation study
Authors:
Kanella Panagiotopoulou,
Theodoros Evrenoglou,
Christopher H Schmid,
Silvia Metelli,
Anna Chaimani
Abstract:
Random effects meta-analysis is widely used for synthesizing studies under the assumption that underlying effects come from a normal distribution. However, under certain conditions the use of alternative distributions might be more appropriate. We conducted a systematic review to identify articles introducing alternative meta-analysis models assuming non-normal between-study distributions. We iden…
▽ More
Random effects meta-analysis is widely used for synthesizing studies under the assumption that underlying effects come from a normal distribution. However, under certain conditions the use of alternative distributions might be more appropriate. We conducted a systematic review to identify articles introducing alternative meta-analysis models assuming non-normal between-study distributions. We identified 27 eligible articles suggesting 24 alternative meta-analysis models based on long-tail and skewed distributions, on mixtures of distributions, and on Dirichlet process priors. Subsequently, we performed a simulation study to evaluate the performance of these models and to compare them with the standard normal model. We considered 22 scenarios varying the amount of between-study variance, the shape of the true distribution, and the number of included studies. We compared 15 models implemented in the Frequentist or in the Bayesian framework. We found small differences with respect to bias between the different models but larger differences in the level of coverage probability. In scenarios with large between-study variance, all models were substantially biased in the estimation of the mean treatment effect. This implies that focusing only on the mean treatment effect of random effects meta-analysis can be misleading when substantial heterogeneity is suspected or outliers are present.
△ Less
Submitted 17 December, 2024;
originally announced December 2024.
-
OrigamiPlot: An R Package and Shiny Web App Enhanced Visualizations for Multivariate Data
Authors:
Yiwen Lu,
Jiayi Tong,
Yuqing Lei,
Alex J. Sutton,
Haitao Chu,
Lisa D. Levine,
Thomas Lumley,
David A. Asch,
Rui Duan,
Christopher H. Schmid,
Yong Chen
Abstract:
We introduce OrigamiPlot, an open-source R package and Shiny web application designed to enhance the visualization of multivariate data. This package implements the origami plot, a novel visualization technique proposed by Duan et al. in 2023, which improves upon traditional radar charts by ensuring that the area of the connected region is invariant to the ordering of attributes, addressing a key…
▽ More
We introduce OrigamiPlot, an open-source R package and Shiny web application designed to enhance the visualization of multivariate data. This package implements the origami plot, a novel visualization technique proposed by Duan et al. in 2023, which improves upon traditional radar charts by ensuring that the area of the connected region is invariant to the ordering of attributes, addressing a key limitation of radar charts. The software facilitates multivariate decision-making by supporting comparisons across multiple objects and attributes, offering customizable features such as auxiliary axes and weighted attributes for enhanced clarity. Through the R package and user-friendly Shiny interface, researchers can efficiently create and customize plots without requiring extensive programming knowledge. Demonstrated using network meta-analysis as a real-world example, OrigamiPlot proves to be a versatile tool for visualizing multivariate data across various fields. This package opens new opportunities for simplifying decision-making processes with complex data.
△ Less
Submitted 19 November, 2024;
originally announced November 2024.
-
Instrumental Variable Approach to Estimating Individual Causal Effects in N-of-1 Trials: Application to ISTOP Study
Authors:
Kexin Qu,
Christopher H. Schmid,
Tao Liu
Abstract:
An N-of-1 trial is a multiple crossover trial conducted in a single individual to provide evidence to directly inform personalized treatment decisions. Advancements in wearable devices greatly improved the feasibility of adopting these trials to identify optimal individual treatment plans, particularly when treatments differ among individuals and responses are highly heterogeneous. Our work was mo…
▽ More
An N-of-1 trial is a multiple crossover trial conducted in a single individual to provide evidence to directly inform personalized treatment decisions. Advancements in wearable devices greatly improved the feasibility of adopting these trials to identify optimal individual treatment plans, particularly when treatments differ among individuals and responses are highly heterogeneous. Our work was motivated by the I-STOP-AFib Study, which examined the impact of different triggers on atrial fibrillation (AF) occurrence. We described a causal framework for 'N-of-1' trial using potential treatment selection paths and potential outcome paths. Two estimands of individual causal effect were defined:(a) the effect of continuous exposure, and (b) the effect of an individual observed behavior. We addressed three challenges: (a) imperfect compliance to the randomized treatment assignment; (b) binary treatments and binary outcomes which led to the 'non-collapsibility' issue of estimating odds ratios; and (c) serial inference in the longitudinal observations. We adopted the Bayesian IV approach where the study randomization was the IV as it impacted the choice of exposure of a subject but not directly the outcome. Estimations were through a system of two parametric Bayesian models to estimate the individual causal effect. Our model got around the non-collapsibility and non-consistency by modeling the confounding mechanism through latent structural models and by inferring with Bayesian posterior of functionals. Autocorrelation present in the repeated measurements was also accounted for. The simulation study showed our method largely reduced bias and greatly improved the coverage of the estimated causal effect, compared to existing methods (ITT, PP, and AT). We applied the method to I-STOP-AFib Study to estimate the individual effect of alcohol on AF occurrence.
△ Less
Submitted 12 October, 2024; v1 submitted 24 June, 2023;
originally announced June 2023.
-
Sample size calculations for n-of-1 trials
Authors:
Jiabei Yang,
Jon A. Steingrimsson,
Christopher H. Schmid
Abstract:
N-of-1 trials, single participant trials in which multiple treatments are sequentially randomized over the study period, can give direct estimates of individual-specific treatment effects. Combining n-of-1 trials gives extra information for estimating the population average treatment effect compared with randomized controlled trials and increases precision for individual-specific treatment effect…
▽ More
N-of-1 trials, single participant trials in which multiple treatments are sequentially randomized over the study period, can give direct estimates of individual-specific treatment effects. Combining n-of-1 trials gives extra information for estimating the population average treatment effect compared with randomized controlled trials and increases precision for individual-specific treatment effect estimates. In this paper, we present a procedure for designing n-of-1 trials. We formally define the design components for determining the sample size of a series of n-of-1 trials, present models for analyzing these trials and use them to derive the sample size formula for estimating the population average treatment effect and the standard error of the individual-specific treatment effect estimates. We recommend first finding the possible designs that will satisfy the power requirement for estimating the population average treatment effect and then, if of interest, finalizing the design to also satisfy the standard error requirements for the individual-specific treatment effect estimates. The procedure is implemented and illustrated in the paper and through a Shiny app.
△ Less
Submitted 17 October, 2021;
originally announced October 2021.
-
On weakly informative prior distributions for the heterogeneity parameter in Bayesian random-effects meta-analysis
Authors:
Christian Röver,
Ralf Bender,
Sofia Dias,
Christopher H. Schmid,
Heinz Schmidli,
Sibylle Sturtz,
Sebastian Weber,
Tim Friede
Abstract:
The normal-normal hierarchical model (NNHM) constitutes a simple and widely used framework for meta-analysis. In the common case of only few studies contributing to the meta-analysis, standard approaches to inference tend to perform poorly, and Bayesian meta-analysis has been suggested as a potential solution. The Bayesian approach, however, requires the sensible specification of prior distributio…
▽ More
The normal-normal hierarchical model (NNHM) constitutes a simple and widely used framework for meta-analysis. In the common case of only few studies contributing to the meta-analysis, standard approaches to inference tend to perform poorly, and Bayesian meta-analysis has been suggested as a potential solution. The Bayesian approach, however, requires the sensible specification of prior distributions. While non-informative priors are commonly used for the overall mean effect, the use of weakly informative priors has been suggested for the heterogeneity parameter, in particular in the setting of (very) few studies. To date, however, a consensus on how to generally specify a weakly informative heterogeneity prior is lacking. Here we investigate the problem more closely and provide some guidance on prior specification.
△ Less
Submitted 13 January, 2021; v1 submitted 16 July, 2020;
originally announced July 2020.
-
Active learning for efficiently training emulators of computationally expensive mathematical models
Authors:
Alexandra G. Ellis,
Rowan Iskandar,
Christopher H. Schmid,
John B. Wong,
Thomas A. Trikalinos
Abstract:
An emulator is a fast-to-evaluate statistical approximation of a detailed mathematical model (simulator). When used in lieu of simulators, emulators can expedite tasks that require many repeated evaluations, such as sensitivity analyses, policy optimization, model calibration, and value-of-information analyses. Emulators are developed using the output of simulators at specific input values (design…
▽ More
An emulator is a fast-to-evaluate statistical approximation of a detailed mathematical model (simulator). When used in lieu of simulators, emulators can expedite tasks that require many repeated evaluations, such as sensitivity analyses, policy optimization, model calibration, and value-of-information analyses. Emulators are developed using the output of simulators at specific input values (design points). Developing an emulator that closely approximates the simulator can require many design points, which becomes computationally expensive. We describe a self-terminating active learning algorithm to efficiently develop emulators tailored to a specific emulation task, and compare it with algorithms that optimize geometric criteria (random latin hypercube sampling and maximum projection designs) and other active learning algorithms (treed Gaussian Processes that optimize typical active learning criteria). We compared the algorithms' root mean square error (RMSE) and maximum absolute deviation from the simulator (MAX) for seven benchmark functions and in a prostate cancer screening model. In the empirical analyses, in simulators with greatly-varying smoothness over the input domain, active learning algorithms resulted in emulators with smaller RMSE and MAX for the same number of design points. In all other cases, all algorithms performed comparably. The proposed algorithm attained satisfactory performance in all analyses, had smaller variability than the treed Gaussian Processes (it is deterministic), and, on average, had similar or better performance as the treed Gaussian Processes in 6 out of 7 benchmark functions and in the prostate cancer model.
△ Less
Submitted 3 January, 2020; v1 submitted 18 December, 2018;
originally announced December 2018.
