Skip to main content

Showing 1–5 of 5 results for author: Rye, J

.
  1. arXiv:2411.05040  [pdf, other

    cs.CL cs.AI

    Bottom-Up and Top-Down Analysis of Values, Agendas, and Observations in Corpora and LLMs

    Authors: Scott E. Friedman, Noam Benkler, Drisana Mosaphir, Jeffrey Rye, Sonja M. Schmer-Galunder, Micah Goldwater, Matthew McLure, Ruta Wheelock, Jeremy Gottlieb, Robert P. Goldman, Christopher Miller

    Abstract: Large language models (LLMs) generate diverse, situated, persuasive texts from a plurality of potential perspectives, influenced heavily by their prompts and training data. As part of LLM adoption, we seek to characterize - and ideally, manage - the socio-cultural values that they express, for reasons of safety, accuracy, inclusion, and cultural fidelity. We present a validated approach to automat… ▽ More

    Submitted 6 November, 2024; originally announced November 2024.

  2. arXiv:2407.12382  [pdf, other

    q-bio.QM physics.bio-ph

    Enhancing Fluorescence Correlation Spectroscopy with Machine Learning for Advanced Analysis of Anomalous Diffusion

    Authors: Nathan Quiblier, Jan-Michael Rye, Pierre Leclerc, Henri Truong, Abdelkrim Hannou, Laurent Héliot, Hugues Berry

    Abstract: The random motion of molecules in living cells has consistently been reported to deviate from standard Brownian motion, a behavior coined as ``anomalous diffusion''. Fluorescence Correlation Spectroscopy (FCS) is a powerful method to quantify molecular motions in living cells but its application is limited to a subset of random motions and to long acquisition times. Here, we propose a new analysis… ▽ More

    Submitted 17 July, 2024; originally announced July 2024.

  3. arXiv:2011.04016  [pdf, other

    cs.AI cs.HC

    Provenance-Based Interpretation of Multi-Agent Information Analysis

    Authors: Scott Friedman, Jeff Rye, David LaVergne, Dan Thomsen, Matthew Allen, Kyle Tunis

    Abstract: Analytic software tools and workflows are increasing in capability, complexity, number, and scale, and the integrity of our workflows is as important as ever. Specifically, we must be able to inspect the process of analytic workflows to assess (1) confidence of the conclusions, (2) risks and biases of the operations involved, (3) sensitivity of the conclusions to sources and agents, (4) impact and… ▽ More

    Submitted 8 November, 2020; originally announced November 2020.

    Comments: 6 pages, 5 figures, appears in Proceedings of TaPP 2020

    Journal ref: Proceedings of TaPP 2020

  4. arXiv:2011.01774  [pdf, other

    cs.AI cs.HC

    Provenance-Based Assessment of Plans in Context

    Authors: Scott E. Friedman, Robert P. Goldman, Richard G. Freedman, Ugur Kuter, Christopher Geib, Jeffrey Rye

    Abstract: Many real-world planning domains involve diverse information sources, external entities, and variable-reliability agents, all of which may impact the confidence, risk, and sensitivity of plans. Humans reviewing a plan may lack context about these factors; however, this information is available during the domain generation, which means it can also be interwoven into the planner and its resulting pl… ▽ More

    Submitted 3 November, 2020; originally announced November 2020.

    Comments: 9 pages, 7 figures, including in Proceedings of the 2020 ICAPS Workshop on Explainable AI Planning (XAIP)

    Journal ref: Proceedings of the 2020 ICAPS Workshop on Explainable AI Planning

  5. Personal Food Computer: A new device for controlled-environment agriculture

    Authors: Eduardo Castelló Ferrer, Jake Rye, Gordon Brander, Tim Savas, Douglas Chambers, Hildreth England, Caleb Harper

    Abstract: Due to their interdisciplinary nature, devices for controlled-environment agriculture have the possibility to turn into ideal tools not only to conduct research on plant phenology but also to create curricula in a wide range of disciplines. Controlled-environment devices are increasing their functionalities as well as improving their accessibility. Traditionally, building one of these devices from… ▽ More

    Submitted 24 June, 2017; v1 submitted 15 June, 2017; originally announced June 2017.

    Comments: 9 pages, 11 figures, Accepted at the 2017 Future Technologies Conference (FTC)