Beam Divergence Reduction of Vortex Waves with a Tailored Lens and a Tailored Reflector
Authors:
M. Haj Hassan,
B. Sievert,
J. T. Svejda,
A. Mostafa Ahmad,
J. Barowski,
A. Rennings,
I. Rolfes,
A. Sezgin,
D. Erni
Abstract:
In this paper, we present a tailored lens and a tailored reflector in order to reduce the large beam divergence inherent to Orbital Angular Momentum waves (OAM waves-Vortex waves) that are generated by an Uniform Circular Patch Antenna Array (UCA) at 10 GHz. The tailored lens and the tailored reflector are designed by the shape function (5) and (9) around the antenna s center axis, respectively. T…
▽ More
In this paper, we present a tailored lens and a tailored reflector in order to reduce the large beam divergence inherent to Orbital Angular Momentum waves (OAM waves-Vortex waves) that are generated by an Uniform Circular Patch Antenna Array (UCA) at 10 GHz. The tailored lens and the tailored reflector are designed by the shape function (5) and (9) around the antenna s center axis, respectively. The tailored lens is compared to UCA without and with conventional lens. The simulated and measured results show a significant improvement when using the tailored lens. Following, a tailored reflector is implemented and compared to UCA without and with conventional reflector. Firstly, the two reflectors are simulated with an impressed field source to neglect the influence of the UCA. The simulated results of the two reflectors show that the tailored reflector has a better performance than the conventional reflector when the height of the reflector $r_0$ is less than around 1.5 $λ$ and when the opening angle of the reflector theta is less than 38° (for UCA with $d$ of $λ/2$). In addition, the reflectors are simulated with real UCA with different shapes of PCB, which can disturb the reflected waves from the reflector. Two lenses and two reflectors are manufactured and measured in an anechoic chamber and compared to the simulation results. This paper shows that the vortex waves needs a special lens or a special reflector to reduce effictively the beam divergence especially when the radius of the UCA is very large.
△ Less
Submitted 1 July, 2020;
originally announced July 2020.
Characterization of Dielectric Materials by Sparse Signal Processing with Iterative Dictionary Updates
Authors:
Udaya S. K. P. Miriya Thanthrige,
Jan Barowski,
Ilona Rolfes,
Daniel Erni,
Thomas Kaiser,
Aydin Sezgin
Abstract:
Estimating parameters and properties of various materials without causing damage to the material under test (MUT) is important in many applications. Thus, in this letter, we address this by wireless sensing. Here, the accuracy of the estimation depends on the accurate estimation of the properties of the reflected signal from the MUT (e.g., number of reflections, their amplitudes and time delays).…
▽ More
Estimating parameters and properties of various materials without causing damage to the material under test (MUT) is important in many applications. Thus, in this letter, we address this by wireless sensing. Here, the accuracy of the estimation depends on the accurate estimation of the properties of the reflected signal from the MUT (e.g., number of reflections, their amplitudes and time delays). For a layered MUT, there are multiple reflections and, due to the limited bandwidth at the receiver, these reflections superimpose each other. Since the number of reflections coming from the MUT is limited, we propose sparse signal processing (SSP) to decompose the reflected signal. In SSP, a so called dictionary is required to obtain a sparse representation of the signal. Here, instead of a fixed dictionary, a dictionary update technique is proposed to improve the estimation of the reflected signal. To validate the proposed method, a vector network analyzer (VNA) based measurement setup is used. It turns out that the estimated dielectric constants are in close agreement with the dielectric constants of the MUTs reported in literature. Further, the proposed approach outperforms the state-of-the-art model-based curve-fitting approach in thickness estimation.
△ Less
Submitted 28 October, 2020; v1 submitted 16 June, 2020;
originally announced June 2020.