First-Order Logic in Finite Domains: Where Semantic Evaluation Competes with SMT Solving
Authors:
Wolfgang Schreiner,
Franz-Xaver Reichl
Abstract:
In this paper, we compare two alternative mechanisms for deciding the validity of first-order formulas over finite domains supported by the mathematical model checker RISCAL: first, the original approach of semantic evaluation (based on an implementation of the denotational semantics of the RISCAL language) and, second, the later approach of SMT solving (based on satisfiability preserving translat…
▽ More
In this paper, we compare two alternative mechanisms for deciding the validity of first-order formulas over finite domains supported by the mathematical model checker RISCAL: first, the original approach of semantic evaluation (based on an implementation of the denotational semantics of the RISCAL language) and, second, the later approach of SMT solving (based on satisfiability preserving translations of RISCAL formulas to SMT-LIB formulas as inputs for SMT solvers). After a short presentation of the two approaches and a discussion of their fundamental pros and cons, we quantitatively evaluate them, both by a set of artificial benchmarks and by a set of benchmarks taken from real-life applications of RISCAL; for this, we apply the state-of-the-art SMT solvers Boolector, CVC4, Yices, and Z3. Our benchmarks demonstrate that (while SMT solving generally vastly outperforms semantic evaluation), the various SMT solvers exhibit great performance differences. More important, we identify classes of formulas where semantic evaluation is able to compete with (or even outperform) satisfiability solving, outlining some room for improvements in the translation of RISCAL formulas to SMT-LIB formulas as well as in the current SMT technology.
△ Less
Submitted 6 September, 2021;
originally announced September 2021.
Certified DQBF Solving by Definition Extraction
Authors:
Franz-Xaver Reichl,
Friedrich Slivovsky,
Stefan Szeider
Abstract:
We propose a new decision procedure for dependency quantified Boolean formulas (DQBF) that uses interpolation-based definition extraction to compute Skolem functions in a counter-example guided inductive synthesis (CEGIS) loop. In each iteration, a family of candidate Skolem functions is tested for correctness using a SAT solver, which either determines that a model has been found, or returns an a…
▽ More
We propose a new decision procedure for dependency quantified Boolean formulas (DQBF) that uses interpolation-based definition extraction to compute Skolem functions in a counter-example guided inductive synthesis (CEGIS) loop. In each iteration, a family of candidate Skolem functions is tested for correctness using a SAT solver, which either determines that a model has been found, or returns an assignment of the universal variables as a counterexample. Fixing a counterexample generally involves changing candidates of multiple existential variables with incomparable dependency sets. Our procedure introduces auxiliary variables -- which we call arbiter variables -- that each represent the value of an existential variable for a particular assignment of its dependency set. Possible repairs are expressed as clauses on these variables, and a SAT solver is invoked to find an assignment that deals with all previously seen counterexamples. Adding arbiter variables defines the values of Skolem functions for assignments where they were previously undefined, and may lead to the detection of Skolem functions by definition extraction in subsequent iterations. A key feature of the proposed procedure is that it is certifying by design: for true DQBF, models can be returned at minimal overhead. Towards certification of false formulas, we prove that clauses can be derived in an expansion-based proof system for DQBF. In an experimental evaluation on standard benchmark sets, an implementation was able to match (and in some cases, surpass) the performance of state-of-the-art DQBF solvers. Moreover, models could be generated and validated for all true instances that were solved.
△ Less
Submitted 4 June, 2021;
originally announced June 2021.
