Cancer incidence estimation from mortality data: a validation study within a population-based cancer registry
Authors:
Daniel Redondo-Sánchez,
Miguel Rodríguez-Barranco,
Alberto Ameijide,
Francisco J. Alonso,
Pablo Fernández-Navarro,
Jose Juan Jiménez-Moleón,
María-José Sánchez
Abstract:
We assessed the validity of one of the most frequently used methods to estimate cancer incidence, on the basis of cancer mortality data and the incidence-to-mortality ratio IMR, the IMR method. Using the previous 15 year cancer mortality time series, we derived the expected yearly number of cancer cases in the period 2004 to 2013 for six cancer sites for each sex. Generalized linear mixed models,…
▽ More
We assessed the validity of one of the most frequently used methods to estimate cancer incidence, on the basis of cancer mortality data and the incidence-to-mortality ratio IMR, the IMR method. Using the previous 15 year cancer mortality time series, we derived the expected yearly number of cancer cases in the period 2004 to 2013 for six cancer sites for each sex. Generalized linear mixed models, including a polynomial function for the year of death and smoothing splines for age, were adjusted. Models were fitted under a Bayesian framework based on Markov chain Monte Carlo methods. The IMR method was applied to five scenarios reflecting different assumptions regarding the behavior of the IMR. We compared incident cases estimated with the IMR method to observed cases diagnosed in 2004 to 2013 in Granada. A goodness-of-fit GOF indicator was formulated to determine the best estimation scenario. The relative differences between the observed and predicted numbers of cancer cases were less than 10 percent for most cancer sites. The constant assumption for the IMR trend provided the best GOF for colon, rectal, lung, bladder, and stomach cancers in men and colon, rectum, breast, and corpus uteri in women.
△ Less
Submitted 19 November, 2024;
originally announced November 2024.
Educational Note: Paradoxical Collider Effect in the Analysis of Non-Communicable Disease Epidemiological Data: a reproducible illustration and web application
Authors:
Miguel Angel Luque-Fernandez,
Michael Schomaker,
Daniel Redondo-Sanchez,
Maria Jose Sanchez Perez,
Anand Vaidya,
Mireille E. Schnitzer
Abstract:
Classical epidemiology has focused on the control of confounding but it is only recently that epidemiologists have started to focus on the bias produced by colliders. A collider for a certain pair of variables (e.g., an outcome Y and an exposure A) is a third variable (C) that is caused by both. In a directed acyclic graph (DAG), a collider is the variable in the middle of an inverted fork (i.e.,…
▽ More
Classical epidemiology has focused on the control of confounding but it is only recently that epidemiologists have started to focus on the bias produced by colliders. A collider for a certain pair of variables (e.g., an outcome Y and an exposure A) is a third variable (C) that is caused by both. In a directed acyclic graph (DAG), a collider is the variable in the middle of an inverted fork (i.e., the variable C in A -> C <- Y). Controlling for, or conditioning an analysis on a collider (i.e., through stratification or regression) can introduce a spurious association between its causes. This potentially explains many paradoxical findings in the medical literature, where established risk factors for a particular outcome appear protective. We use an example from non-communicable disease epidemiology to contextualize and explain the effect of conditioning on a collider. We generate a dataset with 1,000 observations and run Monte-Carlo simulations to estimate the effect of 24-hour dietary sodium intake on systolic blood pressure, controlling for age, which acts as a confounder, and 24-hour urinary protein excretion, which acts as a collider. We illustrate how adding a collider to a regression model introduces bias. Thus, to prevent paradoxical associations, epidemiologists estimating causal effects should be wary of conditioning on colliders. We provide R-code in easy-to-read boxes throughout the manuscript and a GitHub repository (https://github.com/migariane/ColliderApp) for the reader to reproduce our example. We also provide an educational web application allowing real-time interaction to visualize the paradoxical effect of conditioning on a collider http://watzilei.com/shiny/collider/.
△ Less
Submitted 10 November, 2019; v1 submitted 19 September, 2018;
originally announced September 2018.
