-
Linear-Time Graph Programs without Preconditions
Authors:
Ziad Ismaili Alaoui,
Detlef Plump
Abstract:
We report on a recent breakthrough in rule-based graph programming, which allows us to reach the time complexity of imperative linear-time algorithms. In general, achieving the complexity of graph algorithms in conventional languages using graph transformation rules is challenging due to the cost of graph matching. Previous work demonstrated that with rooted rules, certain algorithms can be execut…
▽ More
We report on a recent breakthrough in rule-based graph programming, which allows us to reach the time complexity of imperative linear-time algorithms. In general, achieving the complexity of graph algorithms in conventional languages using graph transformation rules is challenging due to the cost of graph matching. Previous work demonstrated that with rooted rules, certain algorithms can be executed in linear time using the graph programming language GP 2. However, for non-destructive algorithms that retain the structure of input graphs, achieving linear runtime required input graphs to be connected and of bounded node degree. In this paper, we overcome these preconditions by enhancing the graph data structure generated by the GP 2 compiler and exploiting the new structure in programs. We present three case studies, a cycle detection program, a program for numbering the connected components of a graph, and a breadth-first search program. Each of these programs runs in linear time on both connected and disconnected input graphs with arbitrary node degrees. We give empirical evidence for the linear time complexity by using timings for various classes of input graphs.
△ Less
Submitted 26 March, 2025;
originally announced March 2025.
-
Rule-Based Graph Programs Matching the Time Complexity of Imperative Algorithms
Authors:
Ziad Ismaili Alaoui,
Detlef Plump
Abstract:
We report on a recent breakthrough in rule-based graph programming, which allows us to match the time complexity of some fundamental imperative graph algorithms. In general, achieving the complexity of graph algorithms in conventional languages using graph transformation rules is challenging due to the cost of graph matching. Previous work demonstrated that with rooted rules, certain algorithms ca…
▽ More
We report on a recent breakthrough in rule-based graph programming, which allows us to match the time complexity of some fundamental imperative graph algorithms. In general, achieving the complexity of graph algorithms in conventional languages using graph transformation rules is challenging due to the cost of graph matching. Previous work demonstrated that with rooted rules, certain algorithms can be implemented in the graph programming language GP 2 such that their runtime matches the time complexity of imperative implementations. However, this required input graphs to have a bounded node degree and (for some algorithms) to be connected. In this paper, we overcome these limitations by enhancing the graph data structure generated by the GP 2 compiler and exploiting the new structure in programs. We present three case studies: the first program checks whether input graphs are connected, the second program checks whether input graphs are acyclic, and the third program solves the single-source shortest-paths problem for graphs with integer edge-weights. The first two programs run in linear time on (possibly disconnected) input graphs with arbitrary node degrees. The third program runs in time O(nm) on arbitrary input graphs, matching the time complexity of imperative implementations of the Bellman-Ford algorithm. For each program, we formally prove its correctness and time complexity, and provide runtime experiments on various graph classes.
△ Less
Submitted 15 January, 2025;
originally announced January 2025.
-
Random Graph Generation in Context-Free Graph Languages
Authors:
Federico Vastarini,
Detlef Plump
Abstract:
We present a method for generating random hypergraphs in context-free hypergraph languages. It is obtained by adapting Mairson's generation algorithm for context-free string grammars to the setting of hyperedge replacement grammars. Our main results are that for non-ambiguous hyperedge replacement grammars, the method generates hypergraphs uniformly at random and in quadratic time. We illustrate o…
▽ More
We present a method for generating random hypergraphs in context-free hypergraph languages. It is obtained by adapting Mairson's generation algorithm for context-free string grammars to the setting of hyperedge replacement grammars. Our main results are that for non-ambiguous hyperedge replacement grammars, the method generates hypergraphs uniformly at random and in quadratic time. We illustrate our approach by a running example of a hyperedge replacement grammar generating term graphs.
△ Less
Submitted 1 October, 2024;
originally announced October 2024.
-
Formalising the Double-Pushout Approach to Graph Transformation
Authors:
Robert Söldner,
Detlef Plump
Abstract:
In this paper, we utilize Isabelle/HOL to develop a formal framework for the basic theory of double-pushout graph transformation. Our work includes defining essential concepts like graphs, morphisms, pushouts, and pullbacks, and demonstrating their properties. We establish the uniqueness of derivations, drawing upon Rosens 1975 research, and verify the Church-Rosser theorem using Ehrigs and Kreows…
▽ More
In this paper, we utilize Isabelle/HOL to develop a formal framework for the basic theory of double-pushout graph transformation. Our work includes defining essential concepts like graphs, morphisms, pushouts, and pullbacks, and demonstrating their properties. We establish the uniqueness of derivations, drawing upon Rosens 1975 research, and verify the Church-Rosser theorem using Ehrigs and Kreowskis 1976 proof, thereby demonstrating the effectiveness of our formalisation approach. The paper details our methodology in employing Isabelle/HOL, including key design decisions that shaped the current iteration. We explore the technical complexities involved in applying higher-order logic, aiming to give readers an insightful perspective into the engaging aspects of working with an Interactive Theorem Prover. This work emphasizes the increasing importance of formal verification tools in clarifying complex mathematical concepts.
△ Less
Submitted 5 October, 2024; v1 submitted 25 December, 2023;
originally announced December 2023.
-
Time and Space Measures for a Complete Graph Computation Model
Authors:
Brian Courtehoute,
Detlef Plump
Abstract:
We present a computation model based on a subclass of GP 2 graph programs which can simulate any off-line Turing machine of space complexity O(s(n) log s(n)) in space O(s(n)). The simulation only requires a quadratic time overhead. Our model shares this property with Schönhage's storage modification machines and Kolmogorov-Uspenskii machines. These machines use low-level pointer instructions where…
▽ More
We present a computation model based on a subclass of GP 2 graph programs which can simulate any off-line Turing machine of space complexity O(s(n) log s(n)) in space O(s(n)). The simulation only requires a quadratic time overhead. Our model shares this property with Schönhage's storage modification machines and Kolmogorov-Uspenskii machines. These machines use low-level pointer instructions whereas our GP 2-based model uses pattern-based transformation rules and high-level control constructs.
△ Less
Submitted 22 December, 2022;
originally announced December 2022.
-
Towards Mechanised Proofs in Double-Pushout Graph Transformation
Authors:
Robert Söldner,
Detlef Plump
Abstract:
We formalise the basics of the double-pushout approach to graph transformation in the proof assistant Isabelle/HOL and provide associated machine-checked proofs. Specifically, we formalise graphs, graph morphisms and rules, and a definition of direct derivations based on deletion and gluing. We then formalise graph pushouts and prove with Isabelle's help that both deletions and gluings are pushout…
▽ More
We formalise the basics of the double-pushout approach to graph transformation in the proof assistant Isabelle/HOL and provide associated machine-checked proofs. Specifically, we formalise graphs, graph morphisms and rules, and a definition of direct derivations based on deletion and gluing. We then formalise graph pushouts and prove with Isabelle's help that both deletions and gluings are pushouts. We also prove that pushouts are unique up to isomorphism. The formalisation comprises around 2000 lines of source text. Our motivation is to pave the way for rigorous, machine-checked proofs in the theory of the double-pushout approach, and to lay the foundations for verifying graph transformation systems and rule-based graph programs by interactive theorem proving.
△ Less
Submitted 22 December, 2022;
originally announced December 2022.
-
A Small-Step Operational Semantics for GP 2
Authors:
Brian Courtehoute,
Detlef Plump
Abstract:
The operational semantics of a programming language is said to be small-step if each transition step is an atomic computation step in the language. A semantics with this property faithfully corresponds to the implementation of the language. The previous semantics of the graph programming language GP 2 is not fully small-step because the loop and branching commands are defined in big-step style. In…
▽ More
The operational semantics of a programming language is said to be small-step if each transition step is an atomic computation step in the language. A semantics with this property faithfully corresponds to the implementation of the language. The previous semantics of the graph programming language GP 2 is not fully small-step because the loop and branching commands are defined in big-step style. In this paper, we present a truly small-step operational semantics for GP 2 which, in particular, accurately models diverging computations. To obtain small-step definitions of all commands, we equip the transition relation with a stack of host graphs and associated operations. We prove that the new semantics is non-blocking in that every computation either diverges or eventually produces a result graph or the failure state. We also show the finite nondeterminism property, viz. that each configuration has only a finite number of direct successors. The previous semantics of GP 2 is neither non-blocking nor does it have the finite nondeterminism property. We also show that, for a program and a graph that terminate, both semantics are equivalent, and that the old semantics can be simulated with the new one.
△ Less
Submitted 21 December, 2021;
originally announced December 2021.
-
Confluence up to Garbage in Graph Transformation
Authors:
Graham Campbell,
Detlef Plump
Abstract:
The transformation of graphs and graph-like structures is ubiquitous in computer science. When a system is described by graph-transformation rules, it is often desirable that the rules are both terminating and confluent so that rule applications in an arbitrary order produce unique resulting graphs. However, there are application scenarios where the rules are not globally confluent but confluent o…
▽ More
The transformation of graphs and graph-like structures is ubiquitous in computer science. When a system is described by graph-transformation rules, it is often desirable that the rules are both terminating and confluent so that rule applications in an arbitrary order produce unique resulting graphs. However, there are application scenarios where the rules are not globally confluent but confluent on a subclass of graphs that are of interest. In other words, non-resolvable conflicts can only occur on graphs that are considered as "garbage". In this paper, we introduce the notion of confluence up to garbage and generalise Plump's critical pair lemma for double-pushout graph transformation, providing a sufficient condition for confluence up to garbage by non-garbage critical pair analysis. We apply our results in two case studies about efficient language recognition: we present backtracking-free graph reduction systems which recognise a class of flow diagrams and a class of labelled series-parallel graphs, respectively. Both systems are non-confluent but confluent up to garbage. We also give a critical pair condition for subcommutativity up to garbage which, together with closedness, implies confluence up to garbage even in non-terminating systems.
△ Less
Submitted 5 January, 2021;
originally announced January 2021.
-
Fast Rule-Based Graph Programs
Authors:
Graham Campbell,
Brian Courtehoute,
Detlef Plump
Abstract:
Implementing graph algorithms efficiently in a rule-based language is challenging because graph pattern matching is expensive. In this paper, we present a number of linear-time implementations of graph algorithms in GP 2, an experimental programming language based on graph transformation rules which aims to facilitate program analysis and verification. We focus on two classes of rule-based graph p…
▽ More
Implementing graph algorithms efficiently in a rule-based language is challenging because graph pattern matching is expensive. In this paper, we present a number of linear-time implementations of graph algorithms in GP 2, an experimental programming language based on graph transformation rules which aims to facilitate program analysis and verification. We focus on two classes of rule-based graph programs: graph reduction programs which check some graph property, and programs using a depth-first search to test some property or perform an operation such as producing a 2-colouring or a topological sorting. Programs of the first type run in linear time without any constraints on input graphs while programs of the second type require input graphs of bounded degree to run in linear time. Essential for achieving the linear time complexity are so-called rooted rules in GP 2, which, in many situations, can be matched in constant time. For each of our programs, we prove both correctness and complexity, and also give empirical evidence for their run time.
△ Less
Submitted 4 January, 2021; v1 submitted 21 December, 2020;
originally announced December 2020.
-
A Fast Graph Program for Computing Minimum Spanning Trees
Authors:
Brian Courtehoute,
Detlef Plump
Abstract:
When using graph transformation rules to implement graph algorithms, a challenge is to match the efficiency of programs in conventional languages. To help overcome that challenge, the graph programming language GP 2 features rooted rules which, under mild conditions, can match in constant time on bounded degree graphs. In this paper, we present an efficient GP 2 program for computing minimum spann…
▽ More
When using graph transformation rules to implement graph algorithms, a challenge is to match the efficiency of programs in conventional languages. To help overcome that challenge, the graph programming language GP 2 features rooted rules which, under mild conditions, can match in constant time on bounded degree graphs. In this paper, we present an efficient GP 2 program for computing minimum spanning trees. We provide empirical performance results as evidence for the program's subquadratic complexity on bounded degree graphs. This is achieved using depth-first search as well as rooted graph transformation. The program is based on Boruvka's algorithm for minimum spanning trees. Our performance results show that the program's time complexity is consistent with that of classical implementations of Boruvka's algorithm, namely O(m log n), where m is the number of edges and n the number of nodes.
△ Less
Submitted 2 December, 2020;
originally announced December 2020.
-
Verifying Graph Programs with First-Order Logic
Authors:
Gia S. Wulandari,
Detlef Plump
Abstract:
We consider Hoare-style verification for the graph programming language GP 2. In previous work, graph properties were specified by so-called E-conditions which extend nested graph conditions. However, this type of assertions is not easy to comprehend by programmers that are used to formal specifications in standard first-order logic. In this paper, we present an approach to verify GP 2 programs wi…
▽ More
We consider Hoare-style verification for the graph programming language GP 2. In previous work, graph properties were specified by so-called E-conditions which extend nested graph conditions. However, this type of assertions is not easy to comprehend by programmers that are used to formal specifications in standard first-order logic. In this paper, we present an approach to verify GP 2 programs with a standard first-order logic. We show how to construct a strongest liberal postcondition with respect to a rule schema and a precondition. We then extend this construction to obtain strongest liberal postconditions for arbitrary loop-free programs. Compared with previous work, this allows to reason about a vastly generalised class of graph programs. In particular, many programs with nested loops can be verified with the new calculus.
△ Less
Submitted 2 December, 2020;
originally announced December 2020.
-
Verifying Graph Programs with First-Order Logic (Extended Version)
Authors:
Gia Wulandari,
Detlef Plump
Abstract:
We consider Hoare-style verification for the graph programming language GP 2. In previous work, graph properties were specified by so-called E-conditions which extend nested graph conditions. However, this type of assertions is not easy to comprehend by programmers that are used to formal specifications in standard first-order logic. In this paper, we present an approach to verify GP 2 programs wi…
▽ More
We consider Hoare-style verification for the graph programming language GP 2. In previous work, graph properties were specified by so-called E-conditions which extend nested graph conditions. However, this type of assertions is not easy to comprehend by programmers that are used to formal specifications in standard first-order logic. In this paper, we present an approach to verify GP 2 programs with a standard first-order logic. We show how to construct a strongest liberal postcondition with respect to a rule schema and a precondition. We then extend this construction to obtain strongest liberal postconditions for arbitrary loop-free programs. Compared with previous work, this allows to reason about a vastly generalised class of graph programs. In particular, many programs with nested loops can be verified with the new calculus.
△ Less
Submitted 2 November, 2020; v1 submitted 27 October, 2020;
originally announced October 2020.
-
The Improved GP 2 Compiler
Authors:
Graham Campbell,
Jack Romo,
Detlef Plump
Abstract:
GP 2 is a rule-based programming language based on graph transformation rules which aims to facilitate program analysis and verification. Writing efficient programs in such a language is challenging because graph matching is expensive. GP 2 addresses this problem by providing rooted rules which, under mild conditions, can be matched in constant time. Recently, we implemented a number of changes to…
▽ More
GP 2 is a rule-based programming language based on graph transformation rules which aims to facilitate program analysis and verification. Writing efficient programs in such a language is challenging because graph matching is expensive. GP 2 addresses this problem by providing rooted rules which, under mild conditions, can be matched in constant time. Recently, we implemented a number of changes to Bak's GP 2-to-C compiler in order to speed up graph programs. One key improvement is a new data structure for dynamic arrays called BigArray. This is an array of pointers to arrays of entries, successively doubling in size. To demonstrate the speed-up achievable with the new implementation, we present a reduction program for recognising binary DAGs which previously ran in quadratic time but now runs in linear time when compiled with the new compiler.
△ Less
Submitted 4 January, 2021; v1 submitted 6 October, 2020;
originally announced October 2020.
-
Improving the GP 2 Compiler
Authors:
Graham Campbell,
Jack Romo,
Detlef Plump
Abstract:
GP 2 is an experimental programming language based on graph transformation rules which aims to facilitate program analysis and verification. Writing efficient programs in such a language is hard because graph matching is expensive, however GP 2 addresses this problem by providing rooted rules which, under mild conditions, can be matched in constant time using the GP 2 to C compiler. In this report…
▽ More
GP 2 is an experimental programming language based on graph transformation rules which aims to facilitate program analysis and verification. Writing efficient programs in such a language is hard because graph matching is expensive, however GP 2 addresses this problem by providing rooted rules which, under mild conditions, can be matched in constant time using the GP 2 to C compiler. In this report, we document various improvements made to the compiler; most notably the introduction of node lists to improve iteration performance for destructive programs, meaning that binary DAG recognition by reduction need only take linear time where the previous implementation required quadratic time.
△ Less
Submitted 1 January, 2021; v1 submitted 7 February, 2020;
originally announced February 2020.
-
Proceedings Tenth International Workshop on Graph Computation Models
Authors:
Rachid Echahed,
Detlef Plump
Abstract:
This volume contains the post-proceedings of the Tenth International Workshop on Graph Computation Models (GCM 2019: http://gcm2019.imag.fr). The workshop was held in Eindhoven, The Netherlands, on July 17th, 2019, as part of STAF 2019 (Software Technologies: Applications and Foundations).
Graphs are common mathematical structures that are visual and intuitive. They constitute a natural and s…
▽ More
This volume contains the post-proceedings of the Tenth International Workshop on Graph Computation Models (GCM 2019: http://gcm2019.imag.fr). The workshop was held in Eindhoven, The Netherlands, on July 17th, 2019, as part of STAF 2019 (Software Technologies: Applications and Foundations).
Graphs are common mathematical structures that are visual and intuitive. They constitute a natural and seamless way for system modelling in science, engineering and beyond, including computer science, biology, business process modelling, etc. Graph computation models constitute a class of very high-level models where graphs are first-class citizens. The aim of the International GCM Workshop series is to bring together researchers interested in all aspects of computation models based on graphs and graph transformation. It promotes the cross-fertilizing exchange of ideas and experiences among senior and young researchers from the different communities interested in the foundations, applications, and implementations of graph computation models and related areas.
These post-proceedings contain four selected papers from GCM2019 proceedings and an invited presentation that gives an account of the very successful panel discussion dedicated to the Analysis of Graph Transformation Systems, which took place during the workshop and was animated by Reiko Heckel, Leen Lambers and Maryam Ghaffari Saadat.
All submissions were subject to careful refereeing. The topics of accepted papers include theoretical aspects of graph transformation and parsing techniques as well as an application to model-driven engineering.
△ Less
Submitted 18 December, 2019;
originally announced December 2019.
-
Efficient Recognition of Graph Languages
Authors:
Graham Campbell,
Detlef Plump
Abstract:
Graph transformation is the rule-based modification of graphs, and is a discipline dating back to the 1970s. In general, to match the left-hand graph of a fixed rule within a host graph requires polynomial time, but to improve matching performance, Dörr proposed to equip rules and host graphs with distinguished root nodes. This model was implemented by Plump and Bak, but unfortunately, such rules…
▽ More
Graph transformation is the rule-based modification of graphs, and is a discipline dating back to the 1970s. In general, to match the left-hand graph of a fixed rule within a host graph requires polynomial time, but to improve matching performance, Dörr proposed to equip rules and host graphs with distinguished root nodes. This model was implemented by Plump and Bak, but unfortunately, such rules are not invertible. We address this problem by defining rootedness using a partial function into a two-point set rather than pointing graphs with root nodes, meaning derivations are natural double pushouts. Moreover, we give a sufficient condition on rules to give constant time rule application on graphs of bounded degree, and that, the graph class of trees can be recognised in linear time, given an input graph of bounded degree. Finally, we define a new notion of confluence up to garbage and non-garbage critical pairs, showing it is sufficient to require strong joinability of only the non-garbage critical pairs to establish confluence up to garbage. Finally, this new result, presented for conventional graph transformation systems, can be lifted to our rooted setting by encoding node labels and rootedness as looped edges.
△ Less
Submitted 1 January, 2021; v1 submitted 28 November, 2019;
originally announced November 2019.
-
Evolving Graphs with Semantic Neutral Drift
Authors:
Timothy Atkinson,
Detlef Plump,
Susan Stepney
Abstract:
We introduce the concept of Semantic Neutral Drift (SND) for genetic programming (GP), where we exploit equivalence laws to design semantics preserving mutations guaranteed to preserve individuals' fitness scores. A number of digital circuit benchmark problems have been implemented with rule-based graph programs and empirically evaluated, demonstrating quantitative improvements in evolutionary per…
▽ More
We introduce the concept of Semantic Neutral Drift (SND) for genetic programming (GP), where we exploit equivalence laws to design semantics preserving mutations guaranteed to preserve individuals' fitness scores. A number of digital circuit benchmark problems have been implemented with rule-based graph programs and empirically evaluated, demonstrating quantitative improvements in evolutionary performance. Analysis reveals that the benefits of the designed SND reside in more complex processes than simple growth of individuals, and that there are circumstances where it is beneficial to choose otherwise detrimental parameters for a GP system if that facilitates the inclusion of SND.
△ Less
Submitted 3 February, 2020; v1 submitted 24 October, 2018;
originally announced October 2018.
-
A Unification Algorithm for GP 2 (Long Version)
Authors:
Ivaylo Hristakiev,
Detlef Plump
Abstract:
The graph programming language GP 2 allows to apply sets of rule schemata (or "attributed" rules) non-deterministically. To analyse conflicts of programs statically, graphs labelled with expressions are overlayed to construct critical pairs of rule applications. Each overlay induces a system of equations whose solutions represent different conflicts. We present a rule-based unification algorithm f…
▽ More
The graph programming language GP 2 allows to apply sets of rule schemata (or "attributed" rules) non-deterministically. To analyse conflicts of programs statically, graphs labelled with expressions are overlayed to construct critical pairs of rule applications. Each overlay induces a system of equations whose solutions represent different conflicts. We present a rule-based unification algorithm for GP expressions that is terminating, sound and complete. For every input equation, the algorithm generates a finite set of substitutions. Soundness means that each of these substitutions solves the input equation. Since GP labels are lists constructed by concatenation, unification modulo associativity and unit law is required. This problem, which is also known as word unification, is infinitary in general but becomes finitary due to GP's rule schema syntax and the assumption that rule schemata are left-linear. Our unification algorithm is complete in that every solution of an input equation is an instance of some substitution in the generated set.
△ Less
Submitted 5 May, 2017;
originally announced May 2017.
-
Reasoning about Graph Programs
Authors:
Detlef Plump
Abstract:
GP 2 is a non-deterministic programming language for computing by graph transformation. One of the design goals for GP 2 is syntactic and semantic simplicity, to facilitate formal reasoning about programs. In this paper, we demonstrate with four case studies how programmers can prove termination and partial correctness of their solutions. We argue that GP 2's graph transformation rules, together w…
▽ More
GP 2 is a non-deterministic programming language for computing by graph transformation. One of the design goals for GP 2 is syntactic and semantic simplicity, to facilitate formal reasoning about programs. In this paper, we demonstrate with four case studies how programmers can prove termination and partial correctness of their solutions. We argue that GP 2's graph transformation rules, together with induction on the length of program executions, provide a convenient framework for program verification.
△ Less
Submitted 12 September, 2016;
originally announced September 2016.
-
A Reference Interpreter for the Graph Programming Language GP 2
Authors:
Christopher Bak,
Glyn Faulkner,
Detlef Plump,
Colin Runciman
Abstract:
GP 2 is an experimental programming language for computing by graph transformation. An initial interpreter for GP 2, written in the functional language Haskell, provides a concise and simply structured reference implementation. Despite its simplicity, the performance of the interpreter is sufficient for the comparative investigation of a range of test programs. It also provides a platform for the…
▽ More
GP 2 is an experimental programming language for computing by graph transformation. An initial interpreter for GP 2, written in the functional language Haskell, provides a concise and simply structured reference implementation. Despite its simplicity, the performance of the interpreter is sufficient for the comparative investigation of a range of test programs. It also provides a platform for the development of more sophisticated implementations.
△ Less
Submitted 10 April, 2015;
originally announced April 2015.
-
Verifying Monadic Second-Order Properties of Graph Programs
Authors:
Christopher M. Poskitt,
Detlef Plump
Abstract:
The core challenge in a Hoare- or Dijkstra-style proof system for graph programs is in defining a weakest liberal precondition construction with respect to a rule and a postcondition. Previous work addressing this has focused on assertion languages for first-order properties, which are unable to express important global properties of graphs such as acyclicity, connectedness, or existence of paths.…
▽ More
The core challenge in a Hoare- or Dijkstra-style proof system for graph programs is in defining a weakest liberal precondition construction with respect to a rule and a postcondition. Previous work addressing this has focused on assertion languages for first-order properties, which are unable to express important global properties of graphs such as acyclicity, connectedness, or existence of paths. In this paper, we extend the nested graph conditions of Habel, Pennemann, and Rensink to make them equivalently expressive to monadic second-order logic on graphs. We present a weakest liberal precondition construction for these assertions, and demonstrate its use in verifying non-local correctness specifications of graph programs in the sense of Habel et al.
△ Less
Submitted 16 June, 2014; v1 submitted 22 May, 2014;
originally announced May 2014.
-
Proceedings 7th International Workshop on Computing with Terms and Graphs
Authors:
Rachid Echahed,
Detlef Plump
Abstract:
This volume contains the proceedings of the Seventh International Workshop on Computing with Terms and Graphs (TERMGRAPH 2013). The workshop took place in Rome, Italy, on March 23rd, 2013, as part of the sixteenth edition of the European Joint Conferences on Theory and Practice of Software (ETAPS 2013).
Research in term and graph rewriting ranges from theoretical questions to pr…
▽ More
This volume contains the proceedings of the Seventh International Workshop on Computing with Terms and Graphs (TERMGRAPH 2013). The workshop took place in Rome, Italy, on March 23rd, 2013, as part of the sixteenth edition of the European Joint Conferences on Theory and Practice of Software (ETAPS 2013).
Research in term and graph rewriting ranges from theoretical questions to practical issues. Computing with graphs handles the sharing of common subexpressions in a natural and seamless way, and improves the efficiency of computations in space and time. Sharing is ubiquitous in several research areas, as witnessed by the modelling of first- and higher-order term rewriting by (acyclic or cyclic) graph rewriting, the modelling of biological or chemical abstract machines, and the implementation techniques of programming languages: many implementations of functional, logic, object-oriented, concurrent and mobile calculi are based on term graphs. Term graphs are also used in automated theorem proving and symbolic computation systems working on shared structures. The aim of this workshop is to bring together researchers working in different domains on term and graph transformation and to foster their interaction, to provide a forum for presenting new ideas and work in progress, and to enable newcomers to learn about current activities in term graph rewriting.
These proceedings contain six accepted papers and the abstracts of two invited talks. All submissions were subject to careful refereeing. The topics of accepted papers range over a wide spectrum, including theoretical aspects of term graph rewriting, concurrency, semantics as well as application issues of term graph transformation.
△ Less
Submitted 25 February, 2013;
originally announced February 2013.
-
The Design of GP 2
Authors:
Detlef Plump
Abstract:
This papers defines the syntax and semantics of GP 2, a revised version of the graph programming language GP. New concepts are illustrated and explained with example programs. Changes to the first version of GP include an improved type system for labels, a built-in marking mechanism for nodes and edges, a more powerful edge predicate for conditional rule schemata, and functions returning the indeg…
▽ More
This papers defines the syntax and semantics of GP 2, a revised version of the graph programming language GP. New concepts are illustrated and explained with example programs. Changes to the first version of GP include an improved type system for labels, a built-in marking mechanism for nodes and edges, a more powerful edge predicate for conditional rule schemata, and functions returning the indegree and outdegree of matched nodes. Moreover, the semantics of the branching and loop statement have been simplified to allow their efficient implementation.
△ Less
Submitted 24 April, 2012;
originally announced April 2012.
-
The Semantics of Graph Programs
Authors:
Detlef Plump,
Sandra Steinert
Abstract:
GP (for Graph Programs) is a rule-based, nondeterministic programming language for solving graph problems at a high level of abstraction, freeing programmers from handling low-level data structures. The core of GP consists of four constructs: single-step application of a set of conditional graph-transformation rules, sequential composition, branching and iteration. We present a formal semantics fo…
▽ More
GP (for Graph Programs) is a rule-based, nondeterministic programming language for solving graph problems at a high level of abstraction, freeing programmers from handling low-level data structures. The core of GP consists of four constructs: single-step application of a set of conditional graph-transformation rules, sequential composition, branching and iteration. We present a formal semantics for GP in the style of structural operational semantics. A special feature of our semantics is the use of finitely failing programs to define GP's powerful branching and iteration commands.
△ Less
Submitted 23 March, 2010;
originally announced March 2010.
