-
LLM-Powered AI Tutors with Personas for d/Deaf and Hard-of-Hearing Online Learners
Authors:
Haocong Cheng,
Si Chen,
Christopher Perdriau,
Yun Huang
Abstract:
Intelligent tutoring systems (ITS) using artificial intelligence (AI) technology have shown promise in supporting learners with diverse abilities; however, they often fail to meet the specific communication needs and cultural nuances needed by d/Deaf and Hard-of-Hearing (DHH) learners. As large language models (LLMs) provide new opportunities to incorporate personas to AI-based tutors and support…
▽ More
Intelligent tutoring systems (ITS) using artificial intelligence (AI) technology have shown promise in supporting learners with diverse abilities; however, they often fail to meet the specific communication needs and cultural nuances needed by d/Deaf and Hard-of-Hearing (DHH) learners. As large language models (LLMs) provide new opportunities to incorporate personas to AI-based tutors and support dynamic interactive dialogue, this paper explores how DHH learners perceive LLM-powered ITS with different personas and identified design suggestions for improving the interaction. We developed an interface that allows DHH learners to interact with ChatGPT and three LLM-powered AI tutors with different experiences in DHH education while the learners watch an educational video. A user study with 16 DHH participants showed that they perceived conversations with the AI tutors who had DHH education experiences to be more human-like and trustworthy due to the tutors' cultural knowledge of DHH communities. Participants also suggested providing more transparency regarding the tutors' background information to clarify each AI tutor's position within the DHH community. We discuss design implications for more inclusive LLM-based systems, such as supports for the multimodality of sign language.
△ Less
Submitted 14 November, 2024;
originally announced November 2024.
-
Toward an Actionable Socioeconomic-Aware HCI
Authors:
Margaret Burnett,
Abrar Fallatah,
Catherine Hu,
Christopher Perdriau,
Christopher Mendez,
Caroline Gao,
Anita Sarma
Abstract:
Although inequities for individuals in different socioeconomic situations are starting to capture widespread attention, less attention has been given to the socioeconomic inequities that saturate socioeconomic-diverse individuals' user experiences. To enable HCI practitioners to attend to such inequities and avoid unwittingly introducing them, in this paper we consider a wide body of research rele…
▽ More
Although inequities for individuals in different socioeconomic situations are starting to capture widespread attention, less attention has been given to the socioeconomic inequities that saturate socioeconomic-diverse individuals' user experiences. To enable HCI practitioners to attend to such inequities and avoid unwittingly introducing them, in this paper we consider a wide body of research relevant to how an individual's socioeconomic status (SES) can affect their user experiences with technology. We synthesize this foundational research to produce a core set of 6 evidence-based SES "facets" (attribute types and value ranges) that directly relate to user experiences for individuals in different SES strata. We then harness these SES facets to produce actionable paths forward -- including a new structured method we call SocioeconomicMag -- by which HCI researchers and practitioners can bring new socioeconomic-aware practices into their everyday HCI work.
△ Less
Submitted 11 December, 2024; v1 submitted 30 August, 2021;
originally announced August 2021.
-
Engineering Gender-Inclusivity into Software: Tales from the Trenches
Authors:
Claudia Hilderbrand,
Christopher Perdriau,
Lara Letaw,
Jillian Emard,
Zoe Steine-Hanson,
Margaret Burnett,
Anita Sarma
Abstract:
Although the need for gender-inclusivity in software itself is gaining attention among both SE researchers and SE practitioners, and methods have been published to help, little has been reported on how to make such methods work in real-world settings. For example, how do busy software practitioners use such methods in low-cost ways? How do they endeavor to maximize benefits from using them? How do…
▽ More
Although the need for gender-inclusivity in software itself is gaining attention among both SE researchers and SE practitioners, and methods have been published to help, little has been reported on how to make such methods work in real-world settings. For example, how do busy software practitioners use such methods in low-cost ways? How do they endeavor to maximize benefits from using them? How do they avoid the controversies that can arise in talking about gender? To find out how teams were handling these and similar questions, we turned to 10 real-world software teams. We present these teams experiences "in the trenches," in the form of 12 practices and 3 potential pitfalls, so as to provide their insights to other real-world software teams trying to engineer gender-inclusivity into their software products.
△ Less
Submitted 27 May, 2019;
originally announced May 2019.
-
Fixing Inclusivity Bugs for Information Processing Styles and Learning Styles
Authors:
Zoe Steine-Hanson,
Claudia Hilderbrand,
Lara Letaw,
Jillian Emard,
Christopher Perdriau,
Christopher Mendez,
Margaret Burnett,
Anita Sarma
Abstract:
Most software systems today do not support cognitive diversity. Further, because of differences in problem-solving styles that cluster by gender, software that poorly supports cognitive diversity can also embed gender biases. To help software professionals fix gender bias "bugs" related to people's problem-solving styles for information processing and learning of new software we collected inclusiv…
▽ More
Most software systems today do not support cognitive diversity. Further, because of differences in problem-solving styles that cluster by gender, software that poorly supports cognitive diversity can also embed gender biases. To help software professionals fix gender bias "bugs" related to people's problem-solving styles for information processing and learning of new software we collected inclusivity fixes from three sources. The first two are empirical studies we conducted: a heuristics-driven user study and a field research industry study. The third is data that we obtained about a before/after user study of inclusivity bugs. The resulting seven potential inclusivity fixes show how to debug software to be more inclusive for diverse problem-solving styles.
△ Less
Submitted 7 May, 2019;
originally announced May 2019.
