Showing 1–2 of 2 results for author: Papadopoulou, V

Solving Inverse Problems for Spectral Energy Distributions with Deep Generative Networks

Authors: Agapi Rissaki, Orestis Pavlou, Dimitris Fotakis, Vicky Papadopoulou, Andreas Efstathiou

Abstract: We propose an end-to-end approach for solving inverse problems for a class of complex astronomical signals, namely Spectral Energy Distributions (SEDs). Our goal is to reconstruct such signals from scarce and/or unreliable measurements. We achieve that by leveraging a learned structural prior in the form of a Deep Generative Network. Similar methods have been tested almost exclusively for images w… ▽ More We propose an end-to-end approach for solving inverse problems for a class of complex astronomical signals, namely Spectral Energy Distributions (SEDs). Our goal is to reconstruct such signals from scarce and/or unreliable measurements. We achieve that by leveraging a learned structural prior in the form of a Deep Generative Network. Similar methods have been tested almost exclusively for images which display useful properties (e.g., locality, periodicity) that are implicitly exploited. However, SEDs lack such properties which make the problem more challenging. We manage to successfully extend the methods to SEDs using a Generative Latent Optimization model trained with significantly fewer and corrupted data. △ Less

Submitted 9 December, 2020; originally announced December 2020.

Comments: Accepted to NeurIPS 2020 Workshop on Machine Learning and the Physical Sciences

ACM Class: J.2; I.5.4; I.2.6

How Many Attackers Can Selfish Defenders Catch?

Authors: Marios Mavronicolas, Burkhard Monien, Vicky Papadopoulou

Abstract: In a distributed system with {\it attacks} and {\it defenses,} both {\it attackers} and {\it defenders} are self-interested entities. We assume a {\it reward-sharing} scheme among {\it interdependent} defenders; each defender wishes to (locally) maximize her own total {\it fair share} to the attackers extinguished due to her involvement (and possibly due to those of others). What is the {\em max… ▽ More In a distributed system with {\it attacks} and {\it defenses,} both {\it attackers} and {\it defenders} are self-interested entities. We assume a {\it reward-sharing} scheme among {\it interdependent} defenders; each defender wishes to (locally) maximize her own total {\it fair share} to the attackers extinguished due to her involvement (and possibly due to those of others). What is the {\em maximum} amount of protection achievable by a number of such defenders against a number of attackers while the system is in a {\it Nash equilibrium}? As a measure of system protection, we adopt the {\it Defense-Ratio} \cite{MPPS05a}, which provides the expected (inverse) proportion of attackers caught by the defenders. In a {\it Defense-Optimal} Nash equilibrium, the Defense-Ratio is optimized. We discover that the possibility of optimizing the Defense-Ratio (in a Nash equilibrium) depends in a subtle way on how the number of defenders compares to two natural graph-theoretic thresholds we identify. In this vein, we obtain, through a combinatorial analysis of Nash equilibria, a collection of trade-off results: - When the number of defenders is either sufficiently small or sufficiently large, there are cases where the Defense-Ratio can be optimized. The optimization problem is computationally tractable for a large number of defenders; the problem becomes ${\cal NP}$-complete for a small number of defenders and the intractability is inherited from a previously unconsidered combinatorial problem in {\em Fractional Graph Theory}. - Perhaps paradoxically, there is a middle range of values for the number of defenders where optimizing the Defense-Ratio is never possible. △ Less

Submitted 22 December, 2008; originally announced December 2008.