The role of deformability in determining the structural and mechanical properties of bubbles and emulsions
Authors:
Arman Boromand,
Alexandra Signoriello,
Janna Lowensohn,
Carlos S. Orellana,
Eric R. Weeks,
Fangfu Ye,
Mark D. Shattuck,
Corey S. O'Hern
Abstract:
We perform computational studies of jammed particle packings in two dimensions undergoing isotropic compression using the well-characterized soft particle (SP) model and the deformable particle (DP) model that we developed for compressed bubbles and emulsions. In the SP model, circular particles are allowed to overlap, generating purely repulsive forces. In the DP model, particles minimize their p…
▽ More
We perform computational studies of jammed particle packings in two dimensions undergoing isotropic compression using the well-characterized soft particle (SP) model and the deformable particle (DP) model that we developed for compressed bubbles and emulsions. In the SP model, circular particles are allowed to overlap, generating purely repulsive forces. In the DP model, particles minimize their perimeter, while deforming at fixed area to avoid overlap during compression. We directly compare the structural and mechanical properties of jammed particle packings generated using the SP and DP models as a function of the true packing fraction $ρ$, instead of the reduced number density $φ$. We show that near jamming onset the excess contact number $Δz=z-z_J$ and shear modulus ${\cal G}$ scale as $Δρ^{0.5}$ in the large system limit for both the SP and DP models, where $Δρ= ρ-ρ_J$ and $z_J \approx 4$ and $ρ_J \approx 0.842$ are the values at jamming onset. $Δz$ and ${\cal G}$ for the SP and DP models begin to differ for $ρ\gtrsim 0.88$. In this regime, $Δz \sim {\cal G}$ can be described by a sum of two power-laws in $Δρ$, i.e. $Δz \sim {\cal G} \sim C_0Δρ^{0.5} +C_1Δρ^{1.0}$ to lowest order. We show that the ratio $C_1/C_0$ is much larger for the DP model compared to to that for the SP model. We also characterize the void space in jammed packings as a function of $ρ$. We find that, unlike the SP model, the DP model is able to describe the formation of Plateau borders as the system approaches $ρ= 1$. We further show that the results for $z$ and the shape factor ${\cal A}$ versus $ρ$ for the DP model agree with recent experimental studies of compressed foams and emulsions.
△ Less
Submitted 16 August, 2019; v1 submitted 15 April, 2019;
originally announced April 2019.
Generality of shear thickening in suspensions
Authors:
Eric Brown,
Nicole A. Forman,
Carlos S. Orellana,
Hanjun Zhang,
Benjamin W. Maynor,
Douglas E. Betts,
Joseph M. DeSimone,
Heinrich M. Jaeger
Abstract:
Suspensions are of wide interest and form the basis for many smart fluids. For most suspensions, the viscosity decreases with increasing shear rate, i.e. they shear thin. Few are reported to do the opposite, i.e. shear thicken, despite the longstanding expectation that shear thickening is a generic type of suspension behavior. Here we resolve this apparent contradiction. We demonstrate that shea…
▽ More
Suspensions are of wide interest and form the basis for many smart fluids. For most suspensions, the viscosity decreases with increasing shear rate, i.e. they shear thin. Few are reported to do the opposite, i.e. shear thicken, despite the longstanding expectation that shear thickening is a generic type of suspension behavior. Here we resolve this apparent contradiction. We demonstrate that shear thickening can be masked by a yield stress and can be recovered when the yield stress is decreased below a threshold. We show the generality of this argument and quantify the threshold in rheology experiments where we control yield stresses arising from a variety of sources, such as attractions from particle surface interactions, induced dipoles from applied electric and magnetic fields, as well as confinement of hard particles at high packing fractions. These findings open up possibilities for the design of smart suspensions that combine shear thickening with electro- or magnetorheological response.
△ Less
Submitted 4 February, 2010; v1 submitted 28 July, 2009;
originally announced July 2009.
