Benchmarking at the Frontier of Hardware Security: Lessons from Logic Locking
Authors:
Benjamin Tan,
Ramesh Karri,
Nimisha Limaye,
Abhrajit Sengupta,
Ozgur Sinanoglu,
Md Moshiur Rahman,
Swarup Bhunia,
Danielle Duvalsaint,
R. D.,
Blanton,
Amin Rezaei,
Yuanqi Shen,
Hai Zhou,
Leon Li,
Alex Orailoglu,
Zhaokun Han,
Austin Benedetti,
Luciano Brignone,
Muhammad Yasin,
Jeyavijayan Rajendran,
Michael Zuzak,
Ankur Srivastava,
Ujjwal Guin,
Chandan Karfa,
Kanad Basu
, et al. (11 additional authors not shown)
Abstract:
Integrated circuits (ICs) are the foundation of all computing systems. They comprise high-value hardware intellectual property (IP) that are at risk of piracy, reverse-engineering, and modifications while making their way through the geographically-distributed IC supply chain. On the frontier of hardware security are various design-for-trust techniques that claim to protect designs from untrusted…
▽ More
Integrated circuits (ICs) are the foundation of all computing systems. They comprise high-value hardware intellectual property (IP) that are at risk of piracy, reverse-engineering, and modifications while making their way through the geographically-distributed IC supply chain. On the frontier of hardware security are various design-for-trust techniques that claim to protect designs from untrusted entities across the design flow. Logic locking is one technique that promises protection from the gamut of threats in IC manufacturing. In this work, we perform a critical review of logic locking techniques in the literature, and expose several shortcomings. Taking inspiration from other cybersecurity competitions, we devise a community-led benchmarking exercise to address the evaluation deficiencies. In reflecting on this process, we shed new light on deficiencies in evaluation of logic locking and reveal important future directions. The lessons learned can guide future endeavors in other areas of hardware security.
△ Less
Submitted 11 June, 2020;
originally announced June 2020.
Detecting Gas Vapor Leaks Using Uncalibrated Sensors
Authors:
Diaa Badawi,
Tuba Ayhan,
Sule Ozev,
Chengmo Yang,
Alex Orailoglu,
A. Enis Çetin
Abstract:
Chemical and infra-red sensors generate distinct responses under similar conditions because of sensor drift, noise or resolution errors. In this work, we use different time-series data sets obtained by infra-red and E-nose sensors in order to detect Volatile Organic Compounds (VOCs) and Ammonia vapor leaks. We process time-series sensor signals using deep neural networks (DNN). Three neural networ…
▽ More
Chemical and infra-red sensors generate distinct responses under similar conditions because of sensor drift, noise or resolution errors. In this work, we use different time-series data sets obtained by infra-red and E-nose sensors in order to detect Volatile Organic Compounds (VOCs) and Ammonia vapor leaks. We process time-series sensor signals using deep neural networks (DNN). Three neural network algorithms are utilized for this purpose. Additive neural networks (termed AddNet) are based on a multiplication-devoid operator and consequently exhibit energy-efficiency compared to regular neural networks. The second algorithm uses generative adversarial neural networks so as to expose the classifying neural network to more realistic data points in order to help the classifier network to deliver improved generalization. Finally, we use conventional convolutional neural networks as a baseline method and compare their performance with the two aforementioned deep neural network algorithms in order to evaluate their effectiveness empirically.
△ Less
Submitted 20 August, 2019;
originally announced August 2019.
