QUAREP-LiMi: A community-driven initiative to establish guidelines for quality assessment and reproducibility for instruments and images in light microscopy
Authors:
Glyn Nelson,
Ulrike Boehm,
Steve Bagley,
Peter Bajcsy,
Johanna Bischof,
Claire M Brown,
Aurelien Dauphin,
Ian M Dobbie,
John E Eriksson,
Orestis Faklaris,
Julia Fernandez-Rodriguez,
Alexia Ferrand,
Laurent Gelman,
Ali Gheisari,
Hella Hartmann,
Christian Kukat,
Alex Laude,
Miso Mitkovski,
Sebastian Munck,
Alison J North,
Tobias M Rasse,
Ute Resch-Genger,
Lucas C Schuetz,
Arne Seitz,
Caterina Strambio-De-Castillia
, et al. (75 additional authors not shown)
Abstract:
In April 2020, the QUality Assessment and REProducibility for Instruments and Images in Light Microscopy (QUAREP-LiMi) initiative was formed. This initiative comprises imaging scientists from academia and industry who share a common interest in achieving a better understanding of the performance and limitations of microscopes and improved quality control (QC) in light microscopy. The ultimate goal…
▽ More
In April 2020, the QUality Assessment and REProducibility for Instruments and Images in Light Microscopy (QUAREP-LiMi) initiative was formed. This initiative comprises imaging scientists from academia and industry who share a common interest in achieving a better understanding of the performance and limitations of microscopes and improved quality control (QC) in light microscopy. The ultimate goal of the QUAREP-LiMi initiative is to establish a set of common QC standards, guidelines, metadata models, and tools, including detailed protocols, with the ultimate aim of improving reproducible advances in scientific research. This White Paper 1) summarizes the major obstacles identified in the field that motivated the launch of the QUAREP-LiMi initiative; 2) identifies the urgent need to address these obstacles in a grassroots manner, through a community of stakeholders including, researchers, imaging scientists, bioimage analysts, bioimage informatics developers, corporate partners, funding agencies, standards organizations, scientific publishers, and observers of such; 3) outlines the current actions of the QUAREP-LiMi initiative, and 4) proposes future steps that can be taken to improve the dissemination and acceptance of the proposed guidelines to manage QC. To summarize, the principal goal of the QUAREP-LiMi initiative is to improve the overall quality and reproducibility of light microscope image data by introducing broadly accepted standard practices and accurately captured image data metrics.
△ Less
Submitted 27 January, 2021; v1 submitted 21 January, 2021;
originally announced January 2021.
A perspective on Microscopy Metadata: data provenance and quality control
Authors:
Maximiliaan Huisman,
Mathias Hammer,
Alex Rigano,
Ulrike Boehm,
James J. Chambers,
Nathalie Gaudreault,
Alison J. North,
Jaime A. Pimentel,
Damir Sudar,
Peter Bajcsy,
Claire M. Brown,
Alexander D. Corbett,
Orestis Faklaris,
Judith Lacoste,
Alex Laude,
Glyn Nelson,
Roland Nitschke,
David Grunwald,
Caterina Strambio-De-Castillia
Abstract:
The application of microscopy in biomedical research has come a long way since Antonie van Leeuwenhoek discovered unicellular organisms. Countless innovations have positioned light microscopy as a cornerstone of modern biology and a method of choice for connecting omics datasets to their biological and clinical correlates. Still, regardless of how convincing published imaging data looks, it does n…
▽ More
The application of microscopy in biomedical research has come a long way since Antonie van Leeuwenhoek discovered unicellular organisms. Countless innovations have positioned light microscopy as a cornerstone of modern biology and a method of choice for connecting omics datasets to their biological and clinical correlates. Still, regardless of how convincing published imaging data looks, it does not always convey meaningful information about the conditions in which it was acquired, processed, and analyzed. Adequate record-keeping, reporting, and quality control are therefore essential to ensure experimental rigor and data fidelity, allow experiments to be reproducibly repeated, and promote the proper evaluation, interpretation, comparison, and re-use. To this end, microscopy images should be accompanied by complete descriptions detailing experimental procedures, biological samples, microscope hardware specifications, image acquisition parameters, and image analysis procedures, as well as metrics accounting for instrument performance and calibration. However, universal, community-accepted Microscopy Metadata standards and reporting specifications that would result in Findable Accessible Interoperable and Reproducible (FAIR) microscopy data have not yet been established. To understand this shortcoming and to propose a way forward, here we provide an overview of the nature of microscopy metadata and its importance for fostering data quality, reproducibility, scientific rigor, and sharing value in light microscopy. The proposal for tiered Microscopy Metadata Specifications that extend the OME Data Model put forth by the 4D Nucleome Initiative and by Bioimaging North America [1-3] as well as a suite of three complementary and interoperable tools are being developed to facilitate the process of image data documentation and are presented in related manuscripts [4-6].
△ Less
Submitted 31 May, 2021; v1 submitted 24 October, 2019;
originally announced October 2019.
