Showing 1–2 of 2 results for author: Niswonger, B

What You See is What You Get: Local Labor Markets and Skill Acquisition

Authors: Benjamin Niswonger

Abstract: This paper highlights the potential for negative dynamic consequences of recent trends towards the formation of "skill-hubs". I first show evidence that skill acquisition is biased towards skills which are in demand in local labor markets. This fact along with large heterogeneity in outcomes by major and recent reductions in migration rates implies a significant potential for inefficient skill upg… ▽ More This paper highlights the potential for negative dynamic consequences of recent trends towards the formation of "skill-hubs". I first show evidence that skill acquisition is biased towards skills which are in demand in local labor markets. This fact along with large heterogeneity in outcomes by major and recent reductions in migration rates implies a significant potential for inefficient skill upgrading over time. To evaluate the impact of local bias in education in the context of standard models which focus on agglomeration effects, I develop a structural spatial model which includes educational investment. The model focuses on two sources of externalities: productivity through agglomeration and signaling. Both of these affect educational decisions tilting the balance of aggregate skill composition. Signaling externalities can provide a substantial wedge in the response to changes in skill demand and skill concentration with the potential for substantial welfare gains from a more equal distribution of skills. △ Less

Submitted 8 September, 2022; originally announced September 2022.

Optimal Defaults, Limited Enforcement and the Regulation of Contracts

Authors: Zoë Hitzig, Benjamin Niswonger

Abstract: We study how governments promote social welfare through the design of contracting environments. We model the regulation of contracting as default delegation: the government chooses a delegation set of contract terms it is willing to enforce, and influences the default terms that serve as outside options in parties' negotiations. Our analysis shows that limiting the delegation set principally mitig… ▽ More We study how governments promote social welfare through the design of contracting environments. We model the regulation of contracting as default delegation: the government chooses a delegation set of contract terms it is willing to enforce, and influences the default terms that serve as outside options in parties' negotiations. Our analysis shows that limiting the delegation set principally mitigates externalities, while default terms primarily achieve distributional objectives. Applying our model to the regulation of labor contracts, we derive comparative statics on the optimal default delegation policy. As equity concerns or externalities increase, in-kind support for workers increases (e.g. through benefits requirements and public health insurance). Meanwhile, when worker bargaining power decreases away from parity, support for workers increases in cash (e.g. through cash transfers and minimum wage laws). △ Less

Submitted 14 May, 2022; v1 submitted 2 March, 2022; originally announced March 2022.