-
Mixed Bernstein-Fourier Approximants for Optimal Trajectory Generation with Periodic Behavior
Authors:
Liraz Mudrik,
Sean Kragelund,
Isaac Kaminer
Abstract:
Efficient trajectory generation is critical for autonomous systems, yet current numerical methods often struggle to handle periodic behaviors effectively, especially when equidistant time nodes are required. This paper introduces a novel mixed Bernstein-Fourier approximation framework tailored explicitly for optimal motion planning. Our proposed methodology leverages the uniform convergence proper…
▽ More
Efficient trajectory generation is critical for autonomous systems, yet current numerical methods often struggle to handle periodic behaviors effectively, especially when equidistant time nodes are required. This paper introduces a novel mixed Bernstein-Fourier approximation framework tailored explicitly for optimal motion planning. Our proposed methodology leverages the uniform convergence properties of Bernstein polynomials for nonperiodic behaviors while effectively capturing periodic dynamics through Fourier series. Theoretical results are established, including uniform convergence proofs for approximations of functions, derivatives, and integrals, as well as detailed error bound analyses. We further introduce a regulated least squares approach for determining approximation coefficients, enhancing numerical stability and practical applicability. Within an optimal control context, we establish feasibility and consistency of approximated solutions to their continuous counterparts. We also extend the covector mapping theorem, providing theoretical guarantees for approximating dual variables crucial in verifying the necessary optimality conditions from Pontryagin's Maximum Principle. Comprehensive numerical examples illustrate the method's superior performance, demonstrating substantial improvements in computational efficiency and precision in scenarios with complex periodic constraints and dynamics. Our mixed Bernstein-Fourier methodology thus presents a robust, theoretically grounded, and computationally efficient approach for advanced optimal trajectory planning in autonomous systems.
△ Less
Submitted 24 April, 2025;
originally announced April 2025.
-
Consciousness in Artificial Intelligence: Insights from the Science of Consciousness
Authors:
Patrick Butlin,
Robert Long,
Eric Elmoznino,
Yoshua Bengio,
Jonathan Birch,
Axel Constant,
George Deane,
Stephen M. Fleming,
Chris Frith,
Xu Ji,
Ryota Kanai,
Colin Klein,
Grace Lindsay,
Matthias Michel,
Liad Mudrik,
Megan A. K. Peters,
Eric Schwitzgebel,
Jonathan Simon,
Rufin VanRullen
Abstract:
Whether current or near-term AI systems could be conscious is a topic of scientific interest and increasing public concern. This report argues for, and exemplifies, a rigorous and empirically grounded approach to AI consciousness: assessing existing AI systems in detail, in light of our best-supported neuroscientific theories of consciousness. We survey several prominent scientific theories of con…
▽ More
Whether current or near-term AI systems could be conscious is a topic of scientific interest and increasing public concern. This report argues for, and exemplifies, a rigorous and empirically grounded approach to AI consciousness: assessing existing AI systems in detail, in light of our best-supported neuroscientific theories of consciousness. We survey several prominent scientific theories of consciousness, including recurrent processing theory, global workspace theory, higher-order theories, predictive processing, and attention schema theory. From these theories we derive "indicator properties" of consciousness, elucidated in computational terms that allow us to assess AI systems for these properties. We use these indicator properties to assess several recent AI systems, and we discuss how future systems might implement them. Our analysis suggests that no current AI systems are conscious, but also suggests that there are no obvious technical barriers to building AI systems which satisfy these indicators.
△ Less
Submitted 22 August, 2023; v1 submitted 16 August, 2023;
originally announced August 2023.
-
Time to adjust: Improving replicability in experimental psychology by adjustment for evident selective inference
Authors:
Yoav Zeevi,
Sofi Astashenko,
Liad Mudrik,
Yoav Benjamini
Abstract:
The field of psychological sciences has been grappling with the replicability crisis. Various issues have been identified as potential sources of this problem. We bring to light a potential source that has largely been overlooked and demonstrate its significant contribution to the problem: the practice of multiple comparisons. We analyzed 88 papers from the Reproducibility Project in Psychology an…
▽ More
The field of psychological sciences has been grappling with the replicability crisis. Various issues have been identified as potential sources of this problem. We bring to light a potential source that has largely been overlooked and demonstrate its significant contribution to the problem: the practice of multiple comparisons. We analyzed 88 papers from the Reproducibility Project in Psychology and found that multiple results are commonly reported in a single paper, ranging from 4 to 730 (M=77.7), without multiple comparison adjustments. We retroactively applied such an adjustment using a hierarchical FDR controlling procedure (TreeBH; Bogomolov et al., 2021). 21 of 88 results were deemed insignificant after adjustment. Twenty of these 21 results indeed failed to replicate, constituting over a third of the non-replicable findings, while maintaining 97% power. We propose that this should become a common practice as an essential means to increase replicability in experimental psychology.
△ Less
Submitted 25 April, 2025; v1 submitted 20 June, 2020;
originally announced June 2020.
