-
Annealing Approximation in Master-Node Network Model
Authors:
M. O. Hase,
Anderson A. Ferreira,
André C. R. Martins,
Fernando F. Ferreira
Abstract:
This paper investigates absorbing-state phase transitions in opinion dynamics through a master-node network model analyzed using annealing approximation. We develop a theoretical framework examining three fundamental regimes: systems converging to complete disagreement, complete consensus, or both states depending on initial conditions. The phase behavior is governed by two key chiral parameters -…
▽ More
This paper investigates absorbing-state phase transitions in opinion dynamics through a master-node network model analyzed using annealing approximation. We develop a theoretical framework examining three fundamental regimes: systems converging to complete disagreement, complete consensus, or both states depending on initial conditions. The phase behavior is governed by two key chiral parameters - R measuring right-oriented influence and L measuring left-oriented influence in the network interactions. Our analysis reveals a rich phase diagram featuring both continuous and discontinuous transitions between disordered and ordered phases. The discontinuous transition emerges in systems with two absorbing states, where the final configuration depends critically on initial opinion distributions. The annealing approximation provides fundamental insights into how asymmetric social influences (chirality) shape collective opinion formation, acting as a symmetry-breaking element that drives the system toward polarization or consensus.
△ Less
Submitted 5 May, 2025;
originally announced May 2025.
-
An Investigation into the Causal Mechanism of Political Opinion Dynamics: A Model of Hierarchical Coarse-Graining with Community-Bounded Social Influence
Authors:
Valeria Widler,
Barbara Kaminska,
Andre C. R. Martins,
Ivan Puga-Gonzalez
Abstract:
The increasing polarization in democratic societies is an emergent outcome of political opinion dynamics. Yet, the fundamental mechanisms behind the formation of political opinions, from individual beliefs to collective consensus, remain unknown. Understanding that a causal mechanism must account for both bottom-up and top-down influences, we conceptualize political opinion dynamics as hierarchica…
▽ More
The increasing polarization in democratic societies is an emergent outcome of political opinion dynamics. Yet, the fundamental mechanisms behind the formation of political opinions, from individual beliefs to collective consensus, remain unknown. Understanding that a causal mechanism must account for both bottom-up and top-down influences, we conceptualize political opinion dynamics as hierarchical coarse-graining, where microscale opinions integrate into a macro-scale state variable. Using the CODA (Continuous Opinions Discrete Actions) model, we simulate Bayesian opinion updating, social identity-based information integration, and migration between social identity groups to represent higher-level connectivity. This results in coarse-graining across micro, meso, and macro levels. Our findings show that higher-level connectivity shapes information integration, yielding three regimes: independent (disconnected, local convergence), parallel (fast, global convergence), and iterative (slow, stepwise convergence). In the iterative regime, low connectivity fosters transient diversity, indicating an informed consensus. In all regimes, time-scale separation leads to downward causation, where agents converge on the aggregate majority choice, driving consensus. Critically, any degree of coherent higher-level information integration can overcome misalignment via global downward causation. The results highlight how emergent properties of the causal mechanism, such as downward causation, are essential for consensus and may inform more precise investigations into polarized political discourse.
△ Less
Submitted 2 April, 2025; v1 submitted 1 April, 2025;
originally announced April 2025.
-
Memory CODA: introducing memory effects in the Continuous Opinions and Discrete Actions model
Authors:
Andre C. R. Martins
Abstract:
The Continuous Opinions and Discrete Actions (CODA) model has been widely used to study the emergence of extremism in social networks. However, this standard model has been shown to generate unrealistic extreme opinions due to the reinforcement among agents. To address this issue, this paper introduces memory effects into the CODA model to explore how the dynamics of opinion formation change. Spec…
▽ More
The Continuous Opinions and Discrete Actions (CODA) model has been widely used to study the emergence of extremism in social networks. However, this standard model has been shown to generate unrealistic extreme opinions due to the reinforcement among agents. To address this issue, this paper introduces memory effects into the CODA model to explore how the dynamics of opinion formation change. Specifically, each agent is endowed with a memory that stores the previous opinions of its neighbors, which are then utilized to update its own opinion. The paper investigates how incorporating memory affects the strength of choices. We will see that while diminishing the opinion strength, the formation of local domains still causes a significant reinforcement effect. However, unlike the original model, the number of neighbors becomes a relevant variable, suggesting a way to test the results presented in this paper.
Keywords: Opinion dynamics, CODA, Agent-based models, Memory, extremism
△ Less
Submitted 6 May, 2023;
originally announced May 2023.
-
Critical Exponents of Master-Node Network Model
Authors:
Antonio Mihara,
Anderson A. Ferreira,
André C. R. Martins,
Fernando F. Ferreira
Abstract:
The dynamics of competing opinions in social network play an important role in society, with many applications in diverse social contexts as consensus, elections, morality and so on. Here we study a model of interacting agents connected in networks to analyze their decision stochastic process. We consider a first-neighbor interaction between agents in a one-dimensional network with a shape of ring…
▽ More
The dynamics of competing opinions in social network play an important role in society, with many applications in diverse social contexts as consensus, elections, morality and so on. Here we study a model of interacting agents connected in networks to analyze their decision stochastic process. We consider a first-neighbor interaction between agents in a one-dimensional network with a shape of ring topology. Moreover, some agents are also connected to a hub, or master node, that has preferential choice or bias. Such connections are quenched. As the main results, we observed a continuous non-equilibrium phase transition to an absorbing state as a function of control parameters. By using the finite size scaling method, we analyzed the static and dynamic critical exponents to show that this model probably cannot match any universality class already known.
△ Less
Submitted 27 September, 2022;
originally announced September 2022.
-
Opinions and dark energy: A mechanism of long-range repulsion in a toy opinion particle model
Authors:
André C. R. Martins
Abstract:
The concept of opinion particles can be introduced by studying time-continuous versions of Bayesian-inspired opinion dynamics methods. Here, we use opinion particles to further explore how information and Bayesian methods can contribute new ideas to physical problems. Continuous-time limits are shown to correspond to the case with little trust between the original agents, and a synchronous version…
▽ More
The concept of opinion particles can be introduced by studying time-continuous versions of Bayesian-inspired opinion dynamics methods. Here, we use opinion particles to further explore how information and Bayesian methods can contribute new ideas to physical problems. Continuous-time limits are shown to correspond to the case with little trust between the original agents, and a synchronous version of the model is studied. The interaction between two particles is defined as attractive. However, space and distances are not well represented in the model. We define a local measure of distances based on the parameters. That allows distant particles to be repelled in the natural coordinates of any central particle, similar to the observed cosmological effects identified as dark energy.
Keywords: Opinion dynamics, Opinion particles, Dark energy, Bayesian methods, CODA
△ Less
Submitted 8 July, 2021;
originally announced July 2021.
-
Agent mental models and Bayesian rules as a tool to create opinion dynamics models
Authors:
Andre C. R. Martins
Abstract:
Traditional models of opinion dynamics provide a simple approach to understanding human behavior in basic social scenarios. However, when it comes to issues such as polarization and extremism, we require a more nuanced understanding of human biases and cognitive tendencies. In this paper, we propose an approach to modeling opinion dynamics by integrating mental models and assumptions of individual…
▽ More
Traditional models of opinion dynamics provide a simple approach to understanding human behavior in basic social scenarios. However, when it comes to issues such as polarization and extremism, we require a more nuanced understanding of human biases and cognitive tendencies. In this paper, we propose an approach to modeling opinion dynamics by integrating mental models and assumptions of individuals agents using Bayesian-inspired methods. By exploring the relationship between human rationality and Bayesian theory, we demonstrate the efficacy of these methods in describing how opinions evolve. Our analysis leverages the Continuous Opinions and Discrete Actions (CODA) model, applying Bayesian-inspired rules to account for key human behaviors such as confirmation bias, motivated reasoning, and our reluctance to change opinions. Through this, we obtain update rules that offer deeper insights into the dynamics of extreme opinions. Our work sheds light on the role of human biases in shaping opinion dynamics and highlights the potential of Bayesian-inspired modeling to provide more accurate predictions of real-world scenarios.
Keywords: Opinion dynamics, Bayesian methods, Cognition, CODA, Agent-based models
△ Less
Submitted 6 March, 2023; v1 submitted 31 May, 2021;
originally announced June 2021.
-
Senescence, change, and competition: when the desire to pick one model harms our understanding
Authors:
André C. R. Martins
Abstract:
The question of why we age is a fundamental one. It is about who we are, and it also might have critical practical aspects as we try to find ways to age slower. Or to not age at all. Different reasons point at distinct strategies for the research of anti-ageing drugs. While the main reason why biological systems work as they do is evolution, for quite a while, it was believed that aging required a…
▽ More
The question of why we age is a fundamental one. It is about who we are, and it also might have critical practical aspects as we try to find ways to age slower. Or to not age at all. Different reasons point at distinct strategies for the research of anti-ageing drugs. While the main reason why biological systems work as they do is evolution, for quite a while, it was believed that aging required another explanation. Aging seems to harm individuals so much that even if it has group benefits, those benefits were unlikely to be enough. That has led many scientists to propose non-evolutionary explanations as to why we age. But those theories seem to fail at explaining all the data on how species age. Here, I will show that the insistence of finding the one idea that explains it all might be at the root of the difficulty of getting a full picture. By exploring an evolutionary model of aging where locality and temporal changes are fundamental aspects of the problem, I will show that environmental change causes the barrier for group advantages to become much weaker. That weakening might help small group advantages to add up to the point they could make an adaptive difference. To answer why we age, we might have to abandon asking which models are correct. The full answer might come from considering how much each hypothesis behind each existing model, evolutionary and non-evolutionary ones, contributes to the real world's solution.
△ Less
Submitted 8 November, 2020;
originally announced November 2020.
-
Embracing undecidability: Cognitive needs and theory evaluation
Authors:
André C. R. Martins
Abstract:
There are many ways we can not know. Even in systems that we created ourselves, as, for example, systems in mathematical logic, Goëdel and Tarski's theorems impose limits on what we can know. As we try to speak of the real world, things get even harder. We want to compare the results of our mathematical theories to observations, and that means the use of inductive methods. While we can demonstrate…
▽ More
There are many ways we can not know. Even in systems that we created ourselves, as, for example, systems in mathematical logic, Goëdel and Tarski's theorems impose limits on what we can know. As we try to speak of the real world, things get even harder. We want to compare the results of our mathematical theories to observations, and that means the use of inductive methods. While we can demonstrate how an ideal probabilistic induction should work, the requirements of such a method include a few infinities. Furthermore, it would not be even enough to be able to compute those methods and obtain predictions. There are cases where underdeterminacy might be unavoidable, such as the interpretation of quantum mechanics or the current status of string theory. Despite that, scientists still behave as if they were able to know the truth. As it becomes clear that such behavior can cause severe cognitive mistakes, the need to accept our limits, both our natural human limits and the limits of the tools we have created, become apparent. This essay will discuss how we must accept that knowledge is almost only limited to formal systems. Moreover, even in those, there will always be undecidable propositions. We will also see how those questions influence the evaluation of current theories in physics.
△ Less
Submitted 2 June, 2020;
originally announced June 2020.
-
Extremism definitions in opinion dynamics models
Authors:
André C. R. Martins
Abstract:
There are several opinion dynamics models where extremism is defined as part of their characteristics. However, the way extremism is implemented in each model does not correspond to equivalent definitions. While some models focus on one aspect of the problem, others focus on different characteristics. This paper shows how each model only captures part of the problem and how Bayesian inspired opini…
▽ More
There are several opinion dynamics models where extremism is defined as part of their characteristics. However, the way extremism is implemented in each model does not correspond to equivalent definitions. While some models focus on one aspect of the problem, others focus on different characteristics. This paper shows how each model only captures part of the problem and how Bayesian inspired opinion models can help put those differences in perspective. That discussion suggests new ways to introduce variables that can represent the problem of extremism better than we do today.
Keywords: Extremism, Opinion dynamics, CODA, Sociophysics
△ Less
Submitted 29 April, 2020;
originally announced April 2020.
-
Ideologically Motivated Biases in a Multiple Issues Opinion Model
Authors:
Marcelo V. Maciel,
André C. R. Martins
Abstract:
It has been observed people tend to have opinions that are far more internally consistent than it would be reasonable to expect. Here, we study how that observation might emerge from changing how agents trust the opinions of their peers in a model for opinion dynamics with multiple issues. A previous Bayesian inspired opinion model for continuous opinions is extended to include multiple issues. In…
▽ More
It has been observed people tend to have opinions that are far more internally consistent than it would be reasonable to expect. Here, we study how that observation might emerge from changing how agents trust the opinions of their peers in a model for opinion dynamics with multiple issues. A previous Bayesian inspired opinion model for continuous opinions is extended to include multiple issues. In the original model, agents tended to trust less opinions that were too different from their own. We investigate the properties of the extended model in its natural form. And we also introduce the possibility the trust of the agent might depend not only on the specific issue but on the average opinions over the many issues. By adopting such a ideological point of view, we observe an important decrease in the spread of individual opinions.
△ Less
Submitted 27 August, 2019;
originally announced August 2019.
-
Discrete Opinion Dynamics with M choices
Authors:
Andre C. R. Martins
Abstract:
Here, I study how to obtain an opinion dynamics model for the case where there are $M$ possible discrete choices and there is need to model how strong each agent choice is. The new model is obtained as an extension of the Continuous Opinions and Discrete Actions (CODA) model. Technical difficulties with the choice of proper variables for a simple model are solved. For the symmetrical case, a dimen…
▽ More
Here, I study how to obtain an opinion dynamics model for the case where there are $M$ possible discrete choices and there is need to model how strong each agent choice is. The new model is obtained as an extension of the Continuous Opinions and Discrete Actions (CODA) model. Technical difficulties with the choice of proper variables for a simple model are solved. For the symmetrical case, a dimensionless model is found. However, when analyzing the results, a change of variables seems to be required for ease of interpretation. Extremism is observed here as well, generated by the local reinforcement of opinions inside domains of agents with the same choice.
△ Less
Submitted 26 May, 2019;
originally announced May 2019.
-
Network generation and evolution based on spatial and opinion dynamics components
Authors:
André C. R. Martins
Abstract:
In this paper, a model for a spatial network evolution based on a Metropolis simulation is presented. The model uses an energy function that depends both on the distance between the nodes and the stated preferences. The agents influence their network neighbors opinions using the CODA model. That means each agent has a preference between two options based on its probabilistic assessment of which op…
▽ More
In this paper, a model for a spatial network evolution based on a Metropolis simulation is presented. The model uses an energy function that depends both on the distance between the nodes and the stated preferences. The agents influence their network neighbors opinions using the CODA model. That means each agent has a preference between two options based on its probabilistic assessment of which option is the best one. The algorithm generates realistic networks for opinion problems as well as temporal dynamics for those networks. The transition from a random state to an ordered situation, as temperature decreases, is described. Different types of networks appear based on the relative strength of the spatial and opinion components of the energy.
△ Less
Submitted 10 January, 2019;
originally announced January 2019.
-
Don't choose theories: Normative inductive reasoning and the status of physical theories
Authors:
André C. R. Martins
Abstract:
Evaluating theories in physics used to be easy. Our theories provided very distinct predictions. Experimental accuracy was so small that worrying about epistemological problems was not necessary. That is no longer the case. The underdeterminacy problem between string theory and the standard model for current possible experimental energies is one example. We need modern inductive methods for this p…
▽ More
Evaluating theories in physics used to be easy. Our theories provided very distinct predictions. Experimental accuracy was so small that worrying about epistemological problems was not necessary. That is no longer the case. The underdeterminacy problem between string theory and the standard model for current possible experimental energies is one example. We need modern inductive methods for this problem, Bayesian methods or the equivalent Solomonoff induction. To illustrate the proper way to work with induction problems I will use the concepts of Solomoff induction to study the status of string theory. Previous attempts have focused on the Bayesian solution. And they run into the question of why string theory is widely accepted with no data backing it. Logically unsupported additions to the Bayesian method were proposed. I will show here that, by studying the problem from the point of view of the Solomonoff induction those additions can be understood much better. They are not ways to update probabilities. Instead, they are considerations about the priors as well as heuristics to attempt to deal with our finite resources. For the general problem, Solomonoff induction also makes it clear that there is no demarcation problem. Every possible idea can be part of a proper scientific theory. It is just the case that data makes some ideas extremely improbable. Theories where that does not happen must not be discarded. Rejecting ideas is just wrong.
△ Less
Submitted 1 January, 2017;
originally announced January 2017.
-
Stop the tests: Opinion bias and statistical tests
Authors:
André C. R. Martins
Abstract:
When statisticians quarrel about hypothesis testing, the debate usually focus on which method is the correct one. The fundamental question of whether we should test hypothesis at all tends to be forgotten. This lack of debate has its roots on our desire to have ideas we believe and defend. But cognitive experiments have been showing that, when we do choose ideas, we become prey to a large number o…
▽ More
When statisticians quarrel about hypothesis testing, the debate usually focus on which method is the correct one. The fundamental question of whether we should test hypothesis at all tends to be forgotten. This lack of debate has its roots on our desire to have ideas we believe and defend. But cognitive experiments have been showing that, when we do choose ideas, we become prey to a large number of biases. Several of our biases can be grouped together in a single description, an opinion bias. This opinion bias is nothing more than our desire to believe in something and to defend it. Also, despite our feelings, believing has no solid logical or philosophical grounds. In this paper, I will show that if we combine the fact that even logic can never prove an idea right or wrong and the problems our brains cause when we pick ideas, hypothesis testing and its terminology are a recipe for disaster. Testing should have no place when we are thinking about hypothesis.
△ Less
Submitted 20 November, 2016;
originally announced November 2016.
-
Thou shalt not take sides: Cognition, Logic and the need for changing how we believe
Authors:
André C. R. Martins
Abstract:
We believe, in the sense of supporting ideas and considering them correct while dismissing doubts about them. We take sides about ideas and theories as if that was the right thing to do. And yet, from a rational point of view, this type of support and belief is not justifiable at all. The best we can hope when describing the real world, as far as we know, is to have probabilistic knowledge, to hav…
▽ More
We believe, in the sense of supporting ideas and considering them correct while dismissing doubts about them. We take sides about ideas and theories as if that was the right thing to do. And yet, from a rational point of view, this type of support and belief is not justifiable at all. The best we can hope when describing the real world, as far as we know, is to have probabilistic knowledge, to have probabilities associated to each statement. And even that can be very hard to achieve in a reliable way. Far worse, when we defend ideas and believe them as if they were true, Cognitive Psychology experiments show that we stop being able to analyze the question we believe at with competence. In this paper, I gather the evidence we have about taking sides and present the obvious but unseen conclusion that these facts combined mean that we should actually never believe in anything about the real world, except in a probabilistic way. We must actually never take sides because taking sides destroy out abilities to seek for the most correct description of the world. That means we need to start reformulating the way we debate ideas, from our teaching to our political debates, if we actually want to be able to arrive at the best solutions as suggested by whatever evidence we might have. I will show that this has deep consequences on a number of problems, ranging from the emergence of extremism to the reliability of whole scientific fields. Inductive reasoning requires that we allow every idea to make predictions so that we may rank which ideas are better and that has important consequences in scientific practice. The crisis around $p$-values is also discussed and much better understood under the light of this paper results. Finally, I will debate possible ideas to try to minimize the problem.
△ Less
Submitted 20 August, 2015;
originally announced August 2015.
-
Opinion Particles: Classical Physics and Opinion Dynamics
Authors:
André C. R. Martins
Abstract:
A model for Opinion Particles, based on Bayesian-inspired models of Opinion Dynamics such as the CODA model is presented. By extending the discrete time characteristic of those models to continuous time, a theory for the movement of opinion particles is obtained, based only on inference ideas. This will allow inertia to be obtained as a consequence of an extended CODA model. For the general case,…
▽ More
A model for Opinion Particles, based on Bayesian-inspired models of Opinion Dynamics such as the CODA model is presented. By extending the discrete time characteristic of those models to continuous time, a theory for the movement of opinion particles is obtained, based only on inference ideas. This will allow inertia to be obtained as a consequence of an extended CODA model. For the general case, we will see that the likelihoods are associated with variables such as velocity and acceleration of the particles. Newtonian forces are easily defined and the relationship between a force and the equivalent likelihood provided. The case of the harmonic oscillator is solved as an example, to illustrate clearly the relationship between Opinion Particles and Mechanics. Finally, possible paths to apply these results to General Relativity are debated.
△ Less
Submitted 11 July, 2013;
originally announced July 2013.
-
Trust in the CODA model: Opinion Dynamics and the reliability of other agents
Authors:
André C. R. Martins
Abstract:
A model for the joint evolution of opinions and how much the agents trust each other is presented. The model is built using the framework of the Continuous Opinions and Discrete Actions (CODA) model. Instead of a fixed probability that the other agents will decide in the favor of the best choice, each agent considers that other agents might be one one of two types: trustworthy or useless. Trustwor…
▽ More
A model for the joint evolution of opinions and how much the agents trust each other is presented. The model is built using the framework of the Continuous Opinions and Discrete Actions (CODA) model. Instead of a fixed probability that the other agents will decide in the favor of the best choice, each agent considers that other agents might be one one of two types: trustworthy or useless. Trustworthy agents are considered more likely to be right than wrong, while the opposite holds for useless ones. Together with the opinion about the discussed issue, each agent also updates that probability for each one of the other agents it interacts withe probability each one it interacts with is of one type or the other. The dynamics of opinions and the evolution of the trust between the agents are studied. Clear evidences of the existence of two phases, one where strong polarization is observed and the other where a clear division is permanent and reinforced are observed. The transition seems signs of being a first-order transition, with a location dependent on both the parameters of the model and the initial conditions. This happens despite the fact that the trust network evolves much slower than the opinion on the central issue.
△ Less
Submitted 11 April, 2013;
originally announced April 2013.
-
Applying a new method to the 2-d Ising transition
Authors:
Serge Galam,
André C. R. Martins
Abstract:
The Ising ferromagnetic model on a square lattice is revisited using the Galam Unifying Frame (GUF), set to investigate the dynamics of two-state variable systems within the frame of opinion dynamics. When combined with Metropolis dynamics, an unexpected intermediate "dis/order" phase is found with the coexistence of two attractors associated respectively to an ordered and a disordered phases. The…
▽ More
The Ising ferromagnetic model on a square lattice is revisited using the Galam Unifying Frame (GUF), set to investigate the dynamics of two-state variable systems within the frame of opinion dynamics. When combined with Metropolis dynamics, an unexpected intermediate "dis/order" phase is found with the coexistence of two attractors associated respectively to an ordered and a disordered phases. The basin of attraction of initial conditions for the disordered phase attractor starts from zero size at a first critical temperature $T_{c1}$ to embody the total landscape of initial conditions at a second critical temperature $T_{c2}$ with $T_{c1}\approx 1.59$ and $T_{c2}\approx 2.11$ in $J/k_B$ units. It appears that $T_{c2}$ is close to the Onsager result $T_{c}\approx 2.27$. The transition, which is first-order like, exhibits a vertical jump to the disorder phase at $T_{c2}$, reminiscent of the rather abrupt vanishing of the corresponding Onsager second order transition. However, using Glauber dynamics combined with GUF does not yield the intermediate phase and instead the expected single transition at $T_{c}\approx 3.09$. Accordingly, although the "dis/order" phase produced by the GUF - Metropolis combination is not physical, it is an intriguing result to be understood. In particular the fact that Glauber and Metropolis dynamics yield so different results using GUF needs an explanation. The possibility of extending GUF to larger clusters is discussed.
△ Less
Submitted 23 April, 2013; v1 submitted 12 March, 2013;
originally announced March 2013.
-
The building up of individual inflexibility in opinion dynamics
Authors:
André C. R. Martins,
Serge Galam
Abstract:
Two models of opinion dynamics are entangled in order to build a more realistic model of inflexibility. The first one is the Galam Unifying Frame (GUF), which incorporates rational and inflexible agents, and the other one considers the combination of Continuous Opinions and Discrete Actions (CODA). While initially in GUF, inflexibility is a fixed given feature of an agent, it is now the result of…
▽ More
Two models of opinion dynamics are entangled in order to build a more realistic model of inflexibility. The first one is the Galam Unifying Frame (GUF), which incorporates rational and inflexible agents, and the other one considers the combination of Continuous Opinions and Discrete Actions (CODA). While initially in GUF, inflexibility is a fixed given feature of an agent, it is now the result of an accumulation for a given agent who makes the same choice through repeated updates. Inflexibility thus emerges as an internal property of agents becoming a continuous function of the strength of its opinion. Therefore an agent can be more or less inflexible and can shift from inflexibility along one choice to inflexibility along the opposite choice. These individual dynamics of the building up and falling off of an agent inflexibility are driven by the successive local updates of the associated individual opinions. New results are obtained and discussed in terms of predicting outcomes of public debates.
△ Less
Submitted 16 August, 2012;
originally announced August 2012.
-
Modelling Epistemic Systems
Authors:
Andre C. R. Martins
Abstract:
In this Chapter, I will explore the use of modeling in order to understand how Science works. I will discuss the modeling of scientific communities, providing a general, non-comprehensive overview of existing models, with a focus on the use of the tools of Agent-Based Modeling and Opinion Dynamics. A special attention will be paid to models inspired by a Bayesian formalism of Opinion Dynamics. The…
▽ More
In this Chapter, I will explore the use of modeling in order to understand how Science works. I will discuss the modeling of scientific communities, providing a general, non-comprehensive overview of existing models, with a focus on the use of the tools of Agent-Based Modeling and Opinion Dynamics. A special attention will be paid to models inspired by a Bayesian formalism of Opinion Dynamics. The objective of this exploration is to better understand the effect that different conditions might have on the reliability of the opinions of a scientific community. We will see that, by using artificial worlds as exploring grounds, we can prevent some epistemological problems with the definition of truth and obtain insights on the conditions that might cause the quest for more reliable knowledge to fail.
△ Less
Submitted 22 July, 2012;
originally announced July 2012.
-
Discrete Opinion models as a limit case of the CODA model
Authors:
André C. R. Martins
Abstract:
Opinion Dynamics models can be, for most of them, divided between discrete and continuous. They are used in different circumstances and the relationship between them is not clear. Here we will explore the relationship between a model where choices are discrete but opinions are a continuous function (the Continuous Opinions and Discrete Actions, CODA, model) and traditional discrete models. I will…
▽ More
Opinion Dynamics models can be, for most of them, divided between discrete and continuous. They are used in different circumstances and the relationship between them is not clear. Here we will explore the relationship between a model where choices are discrete but opinions are a continuous function (the Continuous Opinions and Discrete Actions, CODA, model) and traditional discrete models. I will show that, when CODA is altered to include reasoning about the influence one agent can have on its own neighbors, agreement and disagreement no longer have the same importance. The limit when an agent considers itself to be more and more influential will be studied and we will see that one recovers discrete dynamics, like those of the Voter model in that limit
△ Less
Submitted 22 January, 2012;
originally announced January 2012.
-
Change and Aging Senescence as an adaptation
Authors:
André C. R. Martins
Abstract:
Understanding why we age is a long-lived open problem in evolutionary biology. Aging is prejudicial to the individual and evolutionary forces should prevent it, but many species show signs of senescence as individuals age. Here, I will propose a model for aging based on assumptions that are compatible with evolutionary theory: i) competition is between individuals; ii) there is some degree of loca…
▽ More
Understanding why we age is a long-lived open problem in evolutionary biology. Aging is prejudicial to the individual and evolutionary forces should prevent it, but many species show signs of senescence as individuals age. Here, I will propose a model for aging based on assumptions that are compatible with evolutionary theory: i) competition is between individuals; ii) there is some degree of locality, so quite often competition will between parents and their progeny; iii) optimal conditions are not stationary, mutation helps each species to keep competitive. When conditions change, a senescent species can drive immortal competitors to extinction. This counter-intuitive result arises from the pruning caused by the death of elder individuals. When there is change and mutation, each generation is slightly better adapted to the new conditions, but some older individuals survive by random chance. Senescence can eliminate those from the genetic pool. Even though individual selection forces always win over group selection ones, it is not exactly the individual that is selected, but its lineage. While senescence damages the individuals and has an evolutionary cost, it has a benefit of its own. It allows each lineage to adapt faster to changing conditions. We age because the world changes.
△ Less
Submitted 23 March, 2011;
originally announced March 2011.
-
Artifacts of opinion dynamics at one dimension
Authors:
Serge Galam,
Andre C. R. Martins
Abstract:
The dynamics of a one dimensional Ising spin system is investigated using three families of local update rules, the Galam majority rules, Glauber inflow influences and Sznadj outflow drives. Given an initial density p of up spins the probability to reach a final state with all spins up is calculated exactly for each choice. The various formulas are compared to a series of previous calculations obt…
▽ More
The dynamics of a one dimensional Ising spin system is investigated using three families of local update rules, the Galam majority rules, Glauber inflow influences and Sznadj outflow drives. Given an initial density p of up spins the probability to reach a final state with all spins up is calculated exactly for each choice. The various formulas are compared to a series of previous calculations obtained analytically using the Kirkwood approximation. They turn out to be identical. The apparent discrepancy with the Galam unifying frame is addressed. The difference in the results seems to stem directly from the implementation of the local update rule used to perform the associated numerical simulations. The findings lead to view the non stepwise exit probability as an artifact of the one dimensional finite size system with fixed spins. The suitability and the significance to perform numerical simulations to model social behavior without solid constraints is discussed and the question of what it means to have a mean field result in this context is addressed.
△ Less
Submitted 10 December, 2010;
originally announced December 2010.
-
A middle option for choices in the Continuous Opinions and Discrete Actions model
Authors:
Andre C. R. Martins
Abstract:
Modeling the conditions for the emergence of extremism is a very important problem, with clear applications for describing the interaction among individuals. Traditional models either are not suited for the task, as in the case of discrete models, or, like Bounded Confidence models, are built with rules that make opinions tend to a common ground between agents or not change at all. Continuous Op…
▽ More
Modeling the conditions for the emergence of extremism is a very important problem, with clear applications for describing the interaction among individuals. Traditional models either are not suited for the task, as in the case of discrete models, or, like Bounded Confidence models, are built with rules that make opinions tend to a common ground between agents or not change at all. Continuous Opinions and Discrete Actions (CODA) model allowed us to observe the emergence of extremist agents, even when every agent was initially a moderate, due to local influence effects. In this paper, the problem of emergence of extremism will be addressed by introducing a middle discrete option in the CODA model, making it similar to a Potts model. Different scenarios for the third option will be discussed: when it is equivalent to withholding judgment, when it is a real third option and when it is a real, middle option. The effects on the opinions will be studied and its effects on extremism discussed. Withholding judgment seems to have an unexpected effect, causing the diminishing of moderate opinions in the long run. For a central third opinion, we find that, under specific conditions, this new choice can act as a buffer between the extreme choices.
△ Less
Submitted 12 April, 2009;
originally announced April 2009.
-
Social Effects in Science: Modelling Agents for a Better Scientific Practice
Authors:
Andre C. R. Martins
Abstract:
Science is a fundamental human activity and we trust its results because it has several error-correcting mechanisms. Its is subject to experimental tests that are replicated by independent parts. Given the huge amount of information available, scientists have to rely on the reports of others. This makes it possible for social effects to influence the scientific community. Here, an Opinion Dynami…
▽ More
Science is a fundamental human activity and we trust its results because it has several error-correcting mechanisms. Its is subject to experimental tests that are replicated by independent parts. Given the huge amount of information available, scientists have to rely on the reports of others. This makes it possible for social effects to influence the scientific community. Here, an Opinion Dynamics agent model is proposed to describe this situation. The influence of Nature through experiments is described as an external field that acts on the experimental agents. We will see that the retirement of old scientists can be fundamental in the acceptance of a new theory. We will also investigate the interplay between social influence and observations. This will allow us to gain insight in the problem of when social effects can have negligible effects in the conclusions of a scientific community and when we should worry about them.
△ Less
Submitted 30 March, 2009;
originally announced March 2009.
-
The Importance of Disagreeing: Contrarians and Extremism in the CODA model
Authors:
André C. R. Martins,
Cleber D. Kuba
Abstract:
In this paper, we study the effects of introducing contrarians in a model of Opinion Dynamics where the agents have internal continuous opinions, but exchange information only about a binary choice that is a function of their continuous opinion, the CODA model. We observe that the hung election scenario still exists here, but it is weaker and it shouldn't be expected in every election. Finally,…
▽ More
In this paper, we study the effects of introducing contrarians in a model of Opinion Dynamics where the agents have internal continuous opinions, but exchange information only about a binary choice that is a function of their continuous opinion, the CODA model. We observe that the hung election scenario still exists here, but it is weaker and it shouldn't be expected in every election. Finally, we also show that the introduction of contrarians make the tendency towards extremism of the original model weaker, indicating that the existence of agents that prefer to disagree might be an important aspect and help society to diminish extremist opinions.
△ Less
Submitted 18 January, 2009;
originally announced January 2009.
-
Opinion Dynamics of Learning Agents: Does Seeking Consensus Lead to Disagreement?
Authors:
Renato Vicente,
Andre C. R. Martins,
Nestor Caticha
Abstract:
We study opinion dynamics in a population of interacting adaptive agents voting on a set of complex multidimensional issues. We consider agents which can classify issues into for or against. The agents arrive at the opinions about each issue in question using an adaptive algorithm. Adaptation comes from learning and the information for the learning process comes from interacting with other neigh…
▽ More
We study opinion dynamics in a population of interacting adaptive agents voting on a set of complex multidimensional issues. We consider agents which can classify issues into for or against. The agents arrive at the opinions about each issue in question using an adaptive algorithm. Adaptation comes from learning and the information for the learning process comes from interacting with other neighboring agents and trying to change the internal state in order to concur with their opinions. The change in the internal state is driven by the information contained in the issue and in the opinion of the other agent. We present results in a simple yet rich context where each agent uses a Boolean Perceptron to state its opinion. If there is no internal clock, so the update occurs with asynchronously exchanged information among pairs of agents, then the typical case, if the number of issues is kept small, is the evolution into a society thorn by the emergence of factions with extreme opposite beliefs. This occurs even when seeking consensus with agents with opposite opinions. The curious result is that it is learning from those that hold the same opinions that drives the emergence of factions. This results follows from the fact that factions are prevented by not learning at all from those agents that hold the same opinion. If the number of issues is large, the dynamics becomes trapped and the society does not evolve into factions and a distribution of moderate opinions is observed. We also study the less realistic, but technically simpler synchronous case showing that global consensus is a fixed point. However, the approach to this consensus is glassy in the limit of large societies if agents adapt even in the case of agreement.
△ Less
Submitted 28 January, 2009; v1 submitted 13 November, 2008;
originally announced November 2008.
-
A Bayesian Framework for Opinion Updates
Authors:
Andre C. R. Martins
Abstract:
Opinion Dynamics lacks a theoretical basis. In this article, I propose to use a decision-theoretic framework, based on the updating of subjective probabilities, as that basis. We will see we get a basic tool for a better understanding of the interaction between the agents in Opinion Dynamics problems and for creating new models. I will review the few existing applications of Bayesian update rules…
▽ More
Opinion Dynamics lacks a theoretical basis. In this article, I propose to use a decision-theoretic framework, based on the updating of subjective probabilities, as that basis. We will see we get a basic tool for a better understanding of the interaction between the agents in Opinion Dynamics problems and for creating new models. I will review the few existing applications of Bayesian update rules to both discrete and continuous opinion problems and show that several traditional models can be obtained as special cases or approximations from these Bayesian models. The empirical basis and useful properties of the framework will be discussed and examples of how the framework can be used to describe different problems given.
△ Less
Submitted 11 July, 2010; v1 submitted 1 November, 2008;
originally announced November 2008.
-
An Opinion Dynamics Model for the Diffusion of Innovations
Authors:
Andre C. R. Martins,
Carlos de B. Pereira,
Renato Vicente
Abstract:
We study the dynamics of the adoption of new products by agents with continuous opinions and discrete actions (CODA). The model is such that the refusal in adopting a new idea or product is increasingly weighted by neighbor agents as evidence against the product. Under these rules, we study the distribution of adoption times and the final proportion of adopters in the population. We compare the…
▽ More
We study the dynamics of the adoption of new products by agents with continuous opinions and discrete actions (CODA). The model is such that the refusal in adopting a new idea or product is increasingly weighted by neighbor agents as evidence against the product. Under these rules, we study the distribution of adoption times and the final proportion of adopters in the population. We compare the cases where initial adopters are clustered to the case where they are randomly scattered around the social network and investigate small world effects on the final proportion of adopters. The model predicts a fat tailed distribution for late adopters which is verified by empirical data.
△ Less
Submitted 12 February, 2009; v1 submitted 30 September, 2008;
originally announced September 2008.
-
Bayesian Updating Rules in Continuous Opinion Dynamics Models
Authors:
Andre C. R. Martins
Abstract:
In this article, I investigate the use of Bayesian updating rules applied to modeling social agents in the case of continuos opinions models. Given another agent statement about the continuous value of a variable $x$, we will see that interesting dynamics emerge when an agent assigns a likelihood to that value that is a mixture of a Gaussian and a Uniform distribution. This represents the idea t…
▽ More
In this article, I investigate the use of Bayesian updating rules applied to modeling social agents in the case of continuos opinions models. Given another agent statement about the continuous value of a variable $x$, we will see that interesting dynamics emerge when an agent assigns a likelihood to that value that is a mixture of a Gaussian and a Uniform distribution. This represents the idea the other agent might have no idea about what he is talking about. The effect of updating only the first moments of the distribution will be studied. and we will see that this generates results similar to those of the Bounded Confidence models. By also updating the second moment, several different opinions always survive in the long run. However, depending on the probability of error and initial uncertainty, those opinions might be clustered around a central value.
△ Less
Submitted 30 July, 2008;
originally announced July 2008.
-
Mobility and Social Network Effects on Extremist Opinions
Authors:
André C. R. Martins
Abstract:
Understanding the emergence of extreme opinions and in what kind of environment they might become less extreme is a central theme in our modern globalized society. A model combining continuous opinions and observed discrete actions (CODA) capable of addressing the important issue of measuring how extreme opinions might be has been recently proposed. In this paper I show extreme opinions to arise…
▽ More
Understanding the emergence of extreme opinions and in what kind of environment they might become less extreme is a central theme in our modern globalized society. A model combining continuous opinions and observed discrete actions (CODA) capable of addressing the important issue of measuring how extreme opinions might be has been recently proposed. In this paper I show extreme opinions to arise in a ubiquitous manner in the CODA model for a multitude of social network structures. Depending on network details reducing extremism seems to be possible. However, a large number agents with extreme opinions is always observed. A significant decrease in the number of extremists can be observed by allowing agents to change their positions in the network.
△ Less
Submitted 11 August, 2008; v1 submitted 15 January, 2008;
originally announced January 2008.
-
The Effect of a Random Drift on Mixed and Pure Strategies in the Snowdrift Game
Authors:
Andre C. R. Martins,
Renato Vicente
Abstract:
The replicator dynamics of players choosing either mixed or pure strategies are usually regarded as equivalent, as long as strategies are played with identical frequencies. In this paper we show that a population of pure strategists can be invaded by mixed strategists in any two-player game with equilibrium coexistence upon the addition of an arbitrarily small amount of noise in the replication…
▽ More
The replicator dynamics of players choosing either mixed or pure strategies are usually regarded as equivalent, as long as strategies are played with identical frequencies. In this paper we show that a population of pure strategists can be invaded by mixed strategists in any two-player game with equilibrium coexistence upon the addition of an arbitrarily small amount of noise in the replication process.
△ Less
Submitted 17 December, 2007; v1 submitted 20 November, 2007;
originally announced November 2007.
-
Continuous Opinions and Discrete Actions in Opinion Dynamics Problems
Authors:
Andre C. R. Martins
Abstract:
A model where agents show discrete behavior regarding their actions, but have continuous opinions that are updated by interacting with other agents is presented. This new updating rule is applied to both the voter and Sznajd models for interaction between neighbors and its consequences are discussed. The appearance of extremists is naturally observed and it seems to be a characteristic of this m…
▽ More
A model where agents show discrete behavior regarding their actions, but have continuous opinions that are updated by interacting with other agents is presented. This new updating rule is applied to both the voter and Sznajd models for interaction between neighbors and its consequences are discussed. The appearance of extremists is naturally observed and it seems to be a characteristic of this model.
△ Less
Submitted 11 August, 2008; v1 submitted 7 November, 2007;
originally announced November 2007.
-
Random, but not so much: A parameterization for the returns and correlation matrix of financial time series
Authors:
Andre C. R. Martins
Abstract:
A parameterization that is a modified version of a previous work is proposed for the returns and correlation matrix of financial time series and its properties are studied. This parameterization allows easy introduction of non-stationarity and it shows several of the characteristics of the true, observed realizations, such as fat tails, volatility clustering, and a spectrum of eigenvalues of the…
▽ More
A parameterization that is a modified version of a previous work is proposed for the returns and correlation matrix of financial time series and its properties are studied. This parameterization allows easy introduction of non-stationarity and it shows several of the characteristics of the true, observed realizations, such as fat tails, volatility clustering, and a spectrum of eigenvalues of the correlation matrix that can be understood as an extension of Random Matrix Theory results. The predicted behavior of this parameterization for the eigenvalues is compared with the eigenvalues of Brazilian assets and it is shown that those predictions fit the data better than Random Matrix Theory.
△ Less
Submitted 2 January, 2007;
originally announced January 2007.
-
Non-Stationary Covariance Matrices And Noise
Authors:
André C. R. Martins
Abstract:
The exact meaning of the noise spectrum of eigenvalues of the covariance matrix is discussed. In order to better understand the possible phenomena behind the observed noise, the spectrum of eigenvalues of the covariance matrix is studied under a model where most of the true eigenvalues are zero and the parameters are non-stationary. The results are compared with real observation of Brazilian ass…
▽ More
The exact meaning of the noise spectrum of eigenvalues of the covariance matrix is discussed. In order to better understand the possible phenomena behind the observed noise, the spectrum of eigenvalues of the covariance matrix is studied under a model where most of the true eigenvalues are zero and the parameters are non-stationary. The results are compared with real observation of Brazilian assets, suggesting that, although the non-stationarity seems to be an important aspect of the problem, partially explaining some of the eigenvalues as well as part of the kurtosis of the assets, it can not, by itself, provide all the corrections needed to make the proposed model fit the data perfectly.
△ Less
Submitted 8 December, 2006; v1 submitted 21 October, 2006;
originally announced October 2006.
-
Phenotypical Behavior and Evolutionary Slavery
Authors:
Andre C. R. Martins
Abstract:
A new evolutionary solution to Prisoner Dilemma situations is proposed in this paper. A specific genetic code may have different phenotypes, meaning different strategies for different individuals carrying that gene. This means that, under the right parameters, it is a good evolutionary solution to create two types of phenotypes with different strategies, here called as leaders and servants. In t…
▽ More
A new evolutionary solution to Prisoner Dilemma situations is proposed in this paper. A specific genetic code may have different phenotypes, meaning different strategies for different individuals carrying that gene. This means that, under the right parameters, it is a good evolutionary solution to create two types of phenotypes with different strategies, here called as leaders and servants. In this solution, servants always cooperate with the leaders and leaders never do with the servants. Inside the same class, the usual strategies apply. Possible applications of this solution are discussed.
△ Less
Submitted 9 February, 2000;
originally announced February 2000.
