Code Improvement Practices at Meta
Authors:
Audris Mockus,
Peter C Rigby,
Rui Abreu,
Anatoly Akkerman,
Yogesh Bhootada,
Payal Bhuptani,
Gurnit Ghardhora,
Lan Hoang Dao,
Chris Hawley,
Renzhi He,
Sagar Krishnamoorthy,
Sergei Krauze,
Jianmin Li,
Anton Lunov,
Dragos Martac,
Francois Morin,
Neil Mitchell,
Venus Montes,
Maher Saba,
Matt Steiner,
Andrea Valori,
Shanchao Wang,
Nachiappan Nagappan
Abstract:
The focus on rapid software delivery inevitably results in the accumulation of technical debt, which, in turn, affects quality and slows future development. Yet, companies with a long history of rapid delivery exist. Our primary aim is to discover how such companies manage to keep their codebases maintainable. Method: we investigate Meta's practices by collaborating with engineers on code quality…
▽ More
The focus on rapid software delivery inevitably results in the accumulation of technical debt, which, in turn, affects quality and slows future development. Yet, companies with a long history of rapid delivery exist. Our primary aim is to discover how such companies manage to keep their codebases maintainable. Method: we investigate Meta's practices by collaborating with engineers on code quality and by analyzing rich source code change history
to reveal a range of practices used for continual improvement of the codebase. In addition, we replicate several aspects of previous industry cases studies investigating the impact of code reengineering. Results: Code improvements at Meta range from completely organic grass-roots done at the initiative of individual engineers, to regularly blocked time and engagement via gamification of Better Engineering (BE) work, to major explicit initiatives aimed at reengineering the complex parts of the codebase or deleting accumulations of dead code. Over 14% of changes are explicitly devoted to code improvement and the developers are given ``badges'' to acknowledge the type of work and the amount of effort. Our investigation to prioritize which parts of the codebase to improve lead to the development of metrics to guide this decision making. Our analysis of the impact of reengineering activities revealed substantial improvements in quality and speed as well as a reduction in code complexity. Overall, such continual improvement is an effective way to develop software with rapid releases, while maintaining high quality.
△ Less
Submitted 23 April, 2025; v1 submitted 16 April, 2025;
originally announced April 2025.
Enhancing Testing at Meta with Rich-State Simulated Populations
Authors:
Nadia Alshahwan,
Arianna Blasi,
Kinga Bojarczuk,
Andrea Ciancone,
Natalija Gucevska,
Mark Harman,
Simon Schellaert,
Inna Harper,
Yue Jia,
Michał Królikowski,
Will Lewis,
Dragos Martac,
Rubmary Rojas,
Kate Ustiuzhanina
Abstract:
This paper reports the results of the deployment of Rich-State Simulated Populations at Meta for both automated and manual testing. We use simulated users (aka test users) to mimic user interactions and acquire state in much the same way that real user accounts acquire state. For automated testing, we present empirical results from deployment on the Facebook, Messenger, and Instagram apps for iOS…
▽ More
This paper reports the results of the deployment of Rich-State Simulated Populations at Meta for both automated and manual testing. We use simulated users (aka test users) to mimic user interactions and acquire state in much the same way that real user accounts acquire state. For automated testing, we present empirical results from deployment on the Facebook, Messenger, and Instagram apps for iOS and Android Platforms. These apps consist of tens of millions of lines of code, communicating with hundreds of millions of lines of backend code, and are used by over 2 billion people every day. Our results reveal that rich state increases average code coverage by 38\%, and endpoint coverage by 61\%. More importantly, it also yields an average increase of 115\% in the faults found by automated testing. The rich-state test user populations are also deployed in a (continually evolving) Test Universe; a web-enabled simulation platform for privacy-safe manual testing, which has been used by over 21,000 Meta engineers since its deployment in November 2022.
△ Less
Submitted 22 March, 2024;
originally announced March 2024.
