-
How do supernova remnants cool? II. Machine learning analysis of supernova remnant simulations
Authors:
P. Smirnova,
E. I. Makarenko,
S. D. Clarke,
E. Glukhov,
S. Walch,
I. Vaezzadeh,
D. Seifried
Abstract:
About 15%-60% of all supernova remnants are estimated to interact with dense molecular clouds. In these high density environments, radiative losses are significant. The cooling radiation can be observed in forbidden lines at optical wavelengths. We aim to determine whether supernovae at different positions within a molecular cloud can be distinguished based on their optical emission, using machine…
▽ More
About 15%-60% of all supernova remnants are estimated to interact with dense molecular clouds. In these high density environments, radiative losses are significant. The cooling radiation can be observed in forbidden lines at optical wavelengths. We aim to determine whether supernovae at different positions within a molecular cloud can be distinguished based on their optical emission, using machine learning. We have conducted a statistical analysis of the optical line emission of simulated supernovae interacting with molecular clouds that formed from the multi-phase interstellar medium modelled in the SILCC-Zoom simulations with and without magnetic fields. This work is based on the post-processing of 3-D (magneto)hydrodynamical simulations. Our data set consists of 22 simulations. The supernovae are placed at a distance of either 25 pc or 50 pc from the molecular cloud centre of mass. First, we calculate optical synthetic emission maps (taking into account dust attenuation within the simulation sub-cube). Second, we analyse the data set of synthetic observations using principle component analysis to identify clusters with the k-means algorithm. We find that the presence or absence of magnetic fields has no statistically significant effect on the optical line emission. However, the ambient density distribution at the site of the supernova changes the entire evolution and morphology of the supernova remnant. Due to the different ambient densities in the 25 pc and 50 pc simulations, we are able to distinguish them in a statistically significant manner. Although, optical line attenuation within the supernova remnant can mimic this result depending on the attenuation model that is used. That is why, multi-dimensional analysis of optical emission line ratios in this work does not give extra information about the environmental conditions (ambient density and ambient magnetic field) of the SNR.
△ Less
Submitted 19 November, 2024;
originally announced November 2024.
-
How do supernova remnants cool? -- I. Morphology, optical emission lines, and shocks
Authors:
Ekaterina I. Makarenko,
Stefanie Walch,
Seamus D. Clarke,
Daniel Seifried,
Thorsten Naab,
Pierre C. Nürnberger,
Tim-Eric Rathjen
Abstract:
Supernovae (SNe) inject $\sim 10^{51}$ erg in the interstellar medium, thereby shocking and heating the gas. A substantial fraction of this energy is later lost via radiative cooling. We present a post-processing module for the FLASH code to calculate the cooling radiation from shock-heated gas using collisional excitation data from MAPPINGS V. When applying this tool to a simulated SN remnant (SN…
▽ More
Supernovae (SNe) inject $\sim 10^{51}$ erg in the interstellar medium, thereby shocking and heating the gas. A substantial fraction of this energy is later lost via radiative cooling. We present a post-processing module for the FLASH code to calculate the cooling radiation from shock-heated gas using collisional excitation data from MAPPINGS V. When applying this tool to a simulated SN remnant (SNR), we find that most energy is emitted in the EUV. However, optical emission lines ($[$O III$]$, $[$N II$]$, $[$S II$]$, H$α$, H$β$) are usually best observable. Our shock detection scheme shows that [S II] and [N II] emissions arise from the thin shell surrounding the SNR, while [O III], H$\rm α$, and H$\rm β$ originate from the volume-filling hot gas inside the SNR bubble. We find that the optical emission lines are affected by the SNR's complex structure and its projection onto the plane of the sky because the escaping line luminosity can be reduced by 10 -- 80\% due to absorption along the line-of-sight. Additionally, the subtraction of contaminating background radiation is required for the correct classification of an SNR on the oxygen or sulphur BPT diagrams. The electron temperature and density obtained from our synthetic observations match well with the simulation but are very sensitive to the assumed metallicity.
△ Less
Submitted 12 May, 2023;
originally announced May 2023.
-
Testing the fossil field hypothesis: could strongly magnetised OB stars produce all known magnetars?
Authors:
Ekaterina I. Makarenko,
Andrei P. Igoshev,
A. F. Kholtygin
Abstract:
Stars of spectral types O and B produce neutron stars (NSs) after supernova explosions. Most of NSs are strongly magnetised including normal radio pulsars with $B \propto 10^{12}$ G and magnetars with $B\propto 10^{14}$ G. A fraction of 7-12 per cent of massive stars are also magnetised with $B\propto 10^3$ G and some are weakly magnetised with $B\propto 1$ G. It was suggested that magnetic fields…
▽ More
Stars of spectral types O and B produce neutron stars (NSs) after supernova explosions. Most of NSs are strongly magnetised including normal radio pulsars with $B \propto 10^{12}$ G and magnetars with $B\propto 10^{14}$ G. A fraction of 7-12 per cent of massive stars are also magnetised with $B\propto 10^3$ G and some are weakly magnetised with $B\propto 1$ G. It was suggested that magnetic fields of NSs could be the fossil remnants of magnetic fields of their progenitors. This work is dedicated to study this hypothesis. First, we gather all modern precise measurements of surface magnetic fields in O, B and A stars. Second, we estimate parameters for log-normal distribution of magnetic fields in B stars and found $μ_B = 2.83\pm 0.1$ $\log_{10}$ (G), $σ_B=0.65\pm 0.09$ for strongly magnetised and $μ_B = 0.14\pm 0.5$ $\log_{10}$ (G), $σ=0.7_{-0.27}^{+0.57}$ for weakly magnetised. Third, we assume that the magnetic field of pulsars and magnetars have $2.7$ DEX difference in magnetic fields and magnetars represent 10 per cent of all young NSs and run population synthesis. We found that it is impossible to simultaneously reproduce pulsars and magnetars populations if the difference in their magnetic fields is 2.7 DEX. Therefore, we conclude that the simple fossil origin of the magnetic field is not viable for NSs.
△ Less
Submitted 21 April, 2021;
originally announced April 2021.
