Semi-Siamese Network for Robust Change Detection Across Different Domains with Applications to 3D Printing
Authors:
Yushuo Niu,
Ethan Chadwick,
Anson W. K. Ma,
Qian Yang
Abstract:
Automatic defect detection for 3D printing processes, which shares many characteristics with change detection problems, is a vital step for quality control of 3D printed products. However, there are some critical challenges in the current state of practice. First, existing methods for computer vision-based process monitoring typically work well only under specific camera viewpoints and lighting si…
▽ More
Automatic defect detection for 3D printing processes, which shares many characteristics with change detection problems, is a vital step for quality control of 3D printed products. However, there are some critical challenges in the current state of practice. First, existing methods for computer vision-based process monitoring typically work well only under specific camera viewpoints and lighting situations, requiring expensive pre-processing, alignment, and camera setups. Second, many defect detection techniques are specific to pre-defined defect patterns and/or print schematics. In this work, we approach the defect detection problem using a novel Semi-Siamese deep learning model that directly compares a reference schematic of the desired print and a camera image of the achieved print. The model then solves an image segmentation problem, precisely identifying the locations of defects of different types with respect to the reference schematic. Our model is designed to enable comparison of heterogeneous images from different domains while being robust against perturbations in the imaging setup such as different camera angles and illumination. Crucially, we show that our simple architecture, which is easy to pre-train for enhanced performance on new datasets, outperforms more complex state-of-the-art approaches based on generative adversarial networks and transformers. Using our model, defect localization predictions can be made in less than half a second per layer using a standard MacBook Pro while achieving an F1-score of more than 0.9, demonstrating the efficacy of using our method for in-situ defect detection in 3D printing.
△ Less
Submitted 2 August, 2023; v1 submitted 16 December, 2022;
originally announced December 2022.
Practical Active Learning with Model Selection for Small Data
Authors:
Maryam Pardakhti,
Nila Mandal,
Anson W. K. Ma,
Qian Yang
Abstract:
Active learning is of great interest for many practical applications, especially in industry and the physical sciences, where there is a strong need to minimize the number of costly experiments necessary to train predictive models. However, there remain significant challenges for the adoption of active learning methods in many practical applications. One important challenge is that many methods as…
▽ More
Active learning is of great interest for many practical applications, especially in industry and the physical sciences, where there is a strong need to minimize the number of costly experiments necessary to train predictive models. However, there remain significant challenges for the adoption of active learning methods in many practical applications. One important challenge is that many methods assume a fixed model, where model hyperparameters are chosen a priori. In practice, it is rarely true that a good model will be known in advance. Existing methods for active learning with model selection typically depend on a medium-sized labeling budget. In this work, we focus on the case of having a very small labeling budget, on the order of a few dozen data points, and develop a simple and fast method for practical active learning with model selection. Our method is based on an underlying pool-based active learner for binary classification using support vector classification with a radial basis function kernel. First we show empirically that our method is able to find hyperparameters that lead to the best performance compared to an oracle model on less separable, difficult to classify datasets, and reasonable performance on datasets that are more separable and easier to classify. Then, we demonstrate that it is possible to refine our model selection method using a weighted approach to trade-off between achieving optimal performance on datasets that are easy to classify, versus datasets that are difficult to classify, which can be tuned based on prior domain knowledge about the dataset.
△ Less
Submitted 21 December, 2021;
originally announced December 2021.
