-
Multidimensional Joint Recurrence Quantification Analysis: detecting coupling between time series of different dimensionalities
Authors:
Sebastian Wallot,
Dan Mønster
Abstract:
One issue with the analysis of complex systems and the interaction between such systems is that they are composed of different number of components, or simply the fact that a different number of observables is available for each system. The challenge is how to analyze the interaction of two systems which are not described by the same number of variables. The approach is to combine different types…
▽ More
One issue with the analysis of complex systems and the interaction between such systems is that they are composed of different number of components, or simply the fact that a different number of observables is available for each system. The challenge is how to analyze the interaction of two systems which are not described by the same number of variables. The approach is to combine different types and number of time series so that they yield a matched set of data points from which coupling or correlation properties can be estimated. Here, we present multidimensional joint recurrence quantification analysis (MdJRQA), a recurrence-based technique that allows to analyze coupling properties between multivariate data sets that differ in dimensionality (i.e., number of observables) and type of data (such as nominal or interval-scaled, for example). First, we introduce the methods, and then test it on simulated data from linear and nonlinear systems. Finally, we discuss practical issue regarding the application of the method.
△ Less
Submitted 28 March, 2023;
originally announced March 2023.
-
Unidimensional and Multidimensional Methods for Recurrence Quantification Analysis with crqa
Authors:
Moreno I. Coco,
Dan Mønster,
Giuseppe Leonardi,
Rick Dale,
Sebastian Wallot
Abstract:
Recurrence quantification analysis is a widely used method for characterizing patterns in time series. This article presents a comprehensive survey for conducting a wide range of recurrence-based analyses to quantify the dynamical structure of single and multivariate time series, and to capture coupling properties underlying leader-follower relationships. The basics of recurrence quantification an…
▽ More
Recurrence quantification analysis is a widely used method for characterizing patterns in time series. This article presents a comprehensive survey for conducting a wide range of recurrence-based analyses to quantify the dynamical structure of single and multivariate time series, and to capture coupling properties underlying leader-follower relationships. The basics of recurrence quantification analysis (RQA) and all its variants are formally introduced step-by-step from the simplest auto-recurrence to the most advanced multivariate case. Importantly, we show how such RQA methods can be deployed under a single computational framework in R using a substantially renewed version our crqa 2.0 package. This package includes implementations of several recent advances in recurrence-based analysis, among them applications to multivariate data, and improved entropy calculations for categorical data. We show concrete applications of our package to example data, together with a detailed description of its functions and some guidelines on their usage.
△ Less
Submitted 28 May, 2020;
originally announced June 2020.
-
Aggression heuristics underlie animal dominance hierarchies and provide evidence of group-level social information
Authors:
Elizabeth A. Hobson,
Dan Mønster,
Simon DeDeo
Abstract:
Members of a social species need to make appropriate decisions about who, how, and when to interact with others in their group. However, it has been difficult for researchers to detect the inputs to these decisions and, in particular, how much information individuals actually have about their social context. We present a new method that can serve as a social assay to quantify how patterns of aggre…
▽ More
Members of a social species need to make appropriate decisions about who, how, and when to interact with others in their group. However, it has been difficult for researchers to detect the inputs to these decisions and, in particular, how much information individuals actually have about their social context. We present a new method that can serve as a social assay to quantify how patterns of aggression depend upon information about the ranks of individuals within social dominance hierarchies. Applied to existing data on aggression in 172 social groups across 85 species in 23 orders, it reveals three main patterns of rank-dependent social dominance: the downward heuristic (aggress uniformly against lower-ranked opponents), close competitors (aggress against opponents ranked slightly below self), and bullying (aggress against opponents ranked much lower than self). The majority of the groups (133 groups, 77%) follow a downward heuristic, but a significant minority (38 groups, 22%) show more complex social dominance patterns (close competitors or bullying) consistent with higher levels of social information use. These patterns are not phylogenetically constrained and different groups within the same species can use different patterns, suggesting that heuristics use may depend on context and the structuring of aggression by social information should not be considered a fixed characteristic of a species. Our approach provides new opportunities to study the use of social information within and across species and the evolution of social complexity and cognition.
△ Less
Submitted 12 November, 2020; v1 submitted 16 October, 2018;
originally announced October 2018.
-
Inferring causality from noisy time series data
Authors:
Dan Mønster,
Riccardo Fusaroli,
Kristian Tylén,
Andreas Roepstorff,
Jacob F. Sherson
Abstract:
Convergent Cross-Mapping (CCM) has shown high potential to perform causal inference in the absence of models. We assess the strengths and weaknesses of the method by varying coupling strength and noise levels in coupled logistic maps. We find that CCM fails to infer accurate coupling strength and even causality direction in synchronized time-series and in the presence of intermediate coupling. We…
▽ More
Convergent Cross-Mapping (CCM) has shown high potential to perform causal inference in the absence of models. We assess the strengths and weaknesses of the method by varying coupling strength and noise levels in coupled logistic maps. We find that CCM fails to infer accurate coupling strength and even causality direction in synchronized time-series and in the presence of intermediate coupling. We find that the presence of noise deterministically reduces the level of cross-mapping fidelity, while the convergence rate exhibits higher levels of robustness. Finally, we propose that controlled noise injections in intermediate-to-strongly coupled systems could enable more accurate causal inferences. Given the inherent noisy nature of real-world systems, our findings enable a more accurate evaluation of CCM applicability and advance suggestions on how to overcome its weaknesses.
△ Less
Submitted 3 March, 2016;
originally announced March 2016.
