-
An evaluation of the BALROG and RoboBA algorithms for determining the position of Fermi/GBM GRBs
Authors:
K. Océlotl. C. López,
Alan M. Watson,
William H. Lee,
Rosa L. Becerra,
Margarita Pereyra
Abstract:
The Fermi/GBM instrument is a vital source of detections of gamma-ray bursts and has an increasingly important role to play in understanding gravitational-wave transients. In both cases, its impact is increased by accurate positions with reliable uncertainties. We evaluate the RoboBA and BALROG algorithms for determining the position of gamma-ray bursts detected by the Fermi/GBM instrument. We con…
▽ More
The Fermi/GBM instrument is a vital source of detections of gamma-ray bursts and has an increasingly important role to play in understanding gravitational-wave transients. In both cases, its impact is increased by accurate positions with reliable uncertainties. We evaluate the RoboBA and BALROG algorithms for determining the position of gamma-ray bursts detected by the Fermi/GBM instrument. We construct a sample of 54 bursts with detections both by Swift/BAT and by Fermi/GBM. We then compare the positions predicted by RoboBA and BALROG with the positions measured by BAT, which we can assume to be the true position. We find that RoboBA and BALROG are similarly precise for bright bursts whose uncertainties are dominated by systematic errors, but RoboBA performs better for faint bursts whose uncertainties are dominated by statistical noise. We further find that the uncertainties in the positions predicted by RoboBA are consistent with the distribution of position errors, whereas BALROG seems to be underestimating the uncertainties by a factor of about two. Additionally, we consider the implications of these results for the follow-up of the optical afterglows of Fermi/GBM bursts. In particular, for the DDOTI wide-field imager we conclude that a single pointing is best. Our sample would allow a similar study to be carried out for other telescopes.
△ Less
Submitted 30 April, 2024;
originally announced April 2024.
-
Deciphering the unusual stellar progenitor of GRB 210704A
Authors:
R. L. Becerra,
E. Troja,
A. M. Watson,
B. O'Connor,
P. Veres,
S. Dichiara,
N. R. Butler,
T. Sakamoto,
K. O. C. Lopez,
F. De Colle,
K. Aoki,
N. Fraija,
M. Im,
A. S. Kutyrev,
W. H. Lee,
G. S. H. Paek,
M. Pereyra,
S. Ravi,
Y. Urata
Abstract:
GRB~210704A is a burst of intermediate duration ($T_{90} \sim 1-4$~s) followed by a fading afterglow and an optical excess that peaked about 7 days after the explosion. Its properties, and in particular those of the excess, do not easily fit into the well established classification scheme of GRBs as being long or short, leaving the nature of its progenitor uncertain. We present multi-wavelength ob…
▽ More
GRB~210704A is a burst of intermediate duration ($T_{90} \sim 1-4$~s) followed by a fading afterglow and an optical excess that peaked about 7 days after the explosion. Its properties, and in particular those of the excess, do not easily fit into the well established classification scheme of GRBs as being long or short, leaving the nature of its progenitor uncertain. We present multi-wavelength observations of the GRB and its counterpart, observed up to 160 days after the burst. In order to decipher the nature of the progenitor system, we present a detailed analysis of the GRB high-energy properties (duration, spectral lag, and Amati correlation), its environment, and late-time optical excess. We discuss three possible scenarios: a neutron star merger, a collapsing massive star, and an atypical explosion possibly hosted in a cluster of galaxies. We find that traditional kilonova and supernova models do not match well the properties of the optical excess, leaving us with the intriguing suggestion that this event was an exotic high-energy merger.
△ Less
Submitted 2 May, 2023; v1 submitted 13 March, 2023;
originally announced March 2023.
-
Constraints on the electromagnetic counterpart of the Neutron Star Black Hole merger GW200115
Authors:
S. Dichiara,
R. L. Becerra,
E. A. Chase,
E. Troja,
W. H. Lee,
A. M. Watson,
N. R. Butler,
B. O'Connor,
M. Pereyra,
K. O. C. López,
A. Y. Lien,
A. Gottlieb,
A. S. Kutyrev
Abstract:
We report the results of our follow-up campaign for the neutron star - black hole (NSBH) merger GW200115 detected during the O3 run of the Advanced LIGO and Advanced Virgo detectors. We obtained wide-field observations with the Deca-Degree Optical Transient Imager (DDOTI) covering ~20% of the total probability area down to a limiting magnitude of $w$=20.5 AB at ~23 h after the merger. Our search f…
▽ More
We report the results of our follow-up campaign for the neutron star - black hole (NSBH) merger GW200115 detected during the O3 run of the Advanced LIGO and Advanced Virgo detectors. We obtained wide-field observations with the Deca-Degree Optical Transient Imager (DDOTI) covering ~20% of the total probability area down to a limiting magnitude of $w$=20.5 AB at ~23 h after the merger. Our search for counterparts returns a single candidate (AT2020aeo), likely not associate to the merger. In total, only 25 sources of interest were identified by the community and later discarded as unrelated to the GW event. We compare our upper limits with the emission predicted by state-of-the-art kilonova simulations and disfavor high mass ejecta (>0.1$M_{\odot}$), indicating that the spin of the system is not particularly high. By combining our optical limits with gamma-ray constraints from $Swift$ and $Fermi$, we disfavor the presence of a standard short duration burst for viewing angles $\lesssim$15 deg from the jet axis. Our conclusions are however limited by the large localization region of this GW event, and accurate prompt positions remain crucial to improving the efficiency of follow-up efforts.
△ Less
Submitted 16 February, 2022; v1 submitted 22 October, 2021;
originally announced October 2021.
-
DDOTI Observations of Gravitational-Wave Sources Discovered in O3
Authors:
R. L. Becerra,
S. Dichiara,
A. M. Watson,
E. Troja,
N. R. Butler,
M. Pereyra,
E. Moreno Méndez,
F. De Colle,
W. H. Lee,
A. S. Kutyrev,
K. O. C. López
Abstract:
We present optical follow-up observations with the DDOTI telescope of gravitational-wave events detected during the Advanced LIGO and Advanced Virgo O3 observing run. DDOTI is capable of responding to an alert in a few minutes, has an instantaneous field of about 69 deg$^{2}$, and obtains $10σ$ upper limits of $w_{\rm lim}=18.5$ to 20.5 AB mag in 1000~s of exposure, depending on the conditions. We…
▽ More
We present optical follow-up observations with the DDOTI telescope of gravitational-wave events detected during the Advanced LIGO and Advanced Virgo O3 observing run. DDOTI is capable of responding to an alert in a few minutes, has an instantaneous field of about 69 deg$^{2}$, and obtains $10σ$ upper limits of $w_{\rm lim}=18.5$ to 20.5 AB mag in 1000~s of exposure, depending on the conditions. We observed 54\% (26 out of 48) of the unretracted gravitational-wave alerts and did not find any electromagnetic counterparts. We compare our upper limits to various possible counterparts: the kilonova AT~2017gfo, models of radioactive- and magnetar-powered kilonovae, short gamma-ray burst afterglows, and AGN flares. Although the large positional uncertainties of GW sources do not allow us to place strong constraints during O3, DDOTI observations of well-localized GW events in O4 and beyond could meaningfully constrain models of compact binary mergers. We show that DDOTI is able to detect kilonovae similar to AT~2017gfo up to about 200~Mpc and magnetar-powered kilonovae up to 1~Gpc. We calculate that nearby ($\lesssim$200 Mpc) afterglows have a high chance ($\approx$70\%) to be detected by rapid ($\lesssim$3 hours) DDOTI observations if observed on-axis, whereas off-axis afterglows are unlikely to be seen. Finally, we suggest that long-term monitoring of massive BBH events with DDOTI could confirm or rule out late AGN flares associated with these events.
△ Less
Submitted 19 July, 2021; v1 submitted 28 June, 2021;
originally announced June 2021.
