Skip to main content

Showing 1–4 of 4 results for author: Lopatina, N

.
  1. arXiv:2010.04480  [pdf, other

    cs.CL

    MLQE-PE: A Multilingual Quality Estimation and Post-Editing Dataset

    Authors: Marina Fomicheva, Shuo Sun, Erick Fonseca, Chrysoula Zerva, Frédéric Blain, Vishrav Chaudhary, Francisco Guzmán, Nina Lopatina, Lucia Specia, André F. T. Martins

    Abstract: We present MLQE-PE, a new dataset for Machine Translation (MT) Quality Estimation (QE) and Automatic Post-Editing (APE). The dataset contains eleven language pairs, with human labels for up to 10,000 translations per language pair in the following formats: sentence-level direct assessments and post-editing effort, and word-level good/bad labels. It also contains the post-edited sentences, as well… ▽ More

    Submitted 11 October, 2021; v1 submitted 9 October, 2020; originally announced October 2020.

  2. arXiv:2009.01865  [pdf, other

    cs.CV cs.LG

    A general approach to bridge the reality-gap

    Authors: Michael Lomnitz, Zigfried Hampel-Arias, Nina Lopatina, Felipe A. Mejia

    Abstract: Employing machine learning models in the real world requires collecting large amounts of data, which is both time consuming and costly to collect. A common approach to circumvent this is to leverage existing, similar data-sets with large amounts of labelled data. However, models trained on these canonical distributions do not readily transfer to real-world ones. Domain adaptation and transfer lear… ▽ More

    Submitted 3 September, 2020; originally announced September 2020.

    Comments: 8 pages, 4 figures, 2 tables

  3. arXiv:1911.01888  [pdf, ps, other

    cs.CR cs.LG eess.AS

    Reducing audio membership inference attack accuracy to chance: 4 defenses

    Authors: Michael Lomnitz, Nina Lopatina, Paul Gamble, Zigfried Hampel-Arias, Lucas Tindall, Felipe A. Mejia, Maria Alejandra Barrios

    Abstract: It is critical to understand the privacy and robustness vulnerabilities of machine learning models, as their implementation expands in scope. In membership inference attacks, adversaries can determine whether a particular set of data was used in training, putting the privacy of the data at risk. Existing work has mostly focused on image related tasks; we generalize this type of attack to speaker i… ▽ More

    Submitted 31 October, 2019; originally announced November 2019.

    Comments: 7 pages, 2 figures, 7 tables

  4. arXiv:1906.06449  [pdf, other

    cs.LG stat.ML

    Robust or Private? Adversarial Training Makes Models More Vulnerable to Privacy Attacks

    Authors: Felipe A. Mejia, Paul Gamble, Zigfried Hampel-Arias, Michael Lomnitz, Nina Lopatina, Lucas Tindall, Maria Alejandra Barrios

    Abstract: Adversarial training was introduced as a way to improve the robustness of deep learning models to adversarial attacks. This training method improves robustness against adversarial attacks, but increases the models vulnerability to privacy attacks. In this work we demonstrate how model inversion attacks, extracting training data directly from the model, previously thought to be intractable become f… ▽ More

    Submitted 14 June, 2019; originally announced June 2019.

    Comments: 11 pages, 11 figures