-
The Present and Future of QCD
Authors:
P. Achenbach,
D. Adhikari,
A. Afanasev,
F. Afzal,
C. A. Aidala,
A. Al-bataineh,
D. K. Almaalol,
M. Amaryan,
D. Androić,
W. R. Armstrong,
M. Arratia,
J. Arrington,
A. Asaturyan,
E. C. Aschenauer,
H. Atac,
H. Avakian,
T. Averett,
C. Ayerbe Gayoso,
X. Bai,
K. N. Barish,
N. Barnea,
G. Basar,
M. Battaglieri,
A. A. Baty,
I. Bautista
, et al. (378 additional authors not shown)
Abstract:
This White Paper presents the community inputs and scientific conclusions from the Hot and Cold QCD Town Meeting that took place September 23-25, 2022 at MIT, as part of the Nuclear Science Advisory Committee (NSAC) 2023 Long Range Planning process. A total of 424 physicists registered for the meeting. The meeting highlighted progress in Quantum Chromodynamics (QCD) nuclear physics since the 2015…
▽ More
This White Paper presents the community inputs and scientific conclusions from the Hot and Cold QCD Town Meeting that took place September 23-25, 2022 at MIT, as part of the Nuclear Science Advisory Committee (NSAC) 2023 Long Range Planning process. A total of 424 physicists registered for the meeting. The meeting highlighted progress in Quantum Chromodynamics (QCD) nuclear physics since the 2015 LRP (LRP15) and identified key questions and plausible paths to obtaining answers to those questions, defining priorities for our research over the coming decade. In defining the priority of outstanding physics opportunities for the future, both prospects for the short (~ 5 years) and longer term (5-10 years and beyond) are identified together with the facilities, personnel and other resources needed to maximize the discovery potential and maintain United States leadership in QCD physics worldwide. This White Paper is organized as follows: In the Executive Summary, we detail the Recommendations and Initiatives that were presented and discussed at the Town Meeting, and their supporting rationales. Section 2 highlights major progress and accomplishments of the past seven years. It is followed, in Section 3, by an overview of the physics opportunities for the immediate future, and in relation with the next QCD frontier: the EIC. Section 4 provides an overview of the physics motivations and goals associated with the EIC. Section 5 is devoted to the workforce development and support of diversity, equity and inclusion. This is followed by a dedicated section on computing in Section 6. Section 7 describes the national need for nuclear data science and the relevance to QCD research.
△ Less
Submitted 4 March, 2023;
originally announced March 2023.
-
Accelerators for Electroweak Physics and Higgs Boson Studies
Authors:
A. Faus-Golfe,
G. H. Hoffstaetter,
Q. Qin,
F. Zimmermann,
T. Barklow,
E. Barzi,
S. Belomestnykh,
M. Biagini,
M. Chamizo Llatas,
J. Gao,
E. Gianfelice,
B. List,
V. Litvinenko,
E. Nanni,
T. Raubenheimer,
T. Roser,
T. Satogata,
V. Shiltsev,
S. Stapnes,
V. Telnov
Abstract:
We discuss the goals, the designs, the state of technical readiness, and the critical R&D needs of the accelerators that are currently under discussion as Higgs and electroweak factories. We also address the respective staging options enabling future energy-frontier colliders. The accelerators covered are based on many different techniques and approaches. They include several circular colliders, v…
▽ More
We discuss the goals, the designs, the state of technical readiness, and the critical R&D needs of the accelerators that are currently under discussion as Higgs and electroweak factories. We also address the respective staging options enabling future energy-frontier colliders. The accelerators covered are based on many different techniques and approaches. They include several circular colliders, various linear colliders, colliders based on energy recovery linacs (ERLs), ERL-ring combinations, as well as gamma-gamma colliders. The linear colliders proposed consist of options for the International Linear Collider (ILC), for the Compact Linear Collider (CLIC), for the Cold Copper Collider (C^3), and for the more recent Higgs-Energy Lepton Collider (HELEN). ERLs are key components of the Recycling Linear e+e- Collider (ReLiC), of the Energy Recovery Linear Collider (ERLC), and of the Circular Energy Recovery Collider (CERC). Among the more conventional ring colliders, the following proposals are featured: the Future Circular Collider (FCC-ee), the Circular Electron Positron Collider (CEPC), the Electron Positron Circular Collider at Fermilab (EPCCF), and the Large Electron Positron collider $\#$3 (LEP-3). In addition, we consider the X-ray FEL based gamma-gamma Collider Higgs Factory (XCC) and the High-Energy High-Luminosity gamma-gamma collider (HE&HL gamma-gamma). Finally, a Higgs factory based on a circular muon collider is mentioned for completeness.
△ Less
Submitted 20 November, 2022; v1 submitted 13 September, 2022;
originally announced September 2022.
-
Report of the Snowmass 2021 e$^+$e$^-$-Collider Forum
Authors:
Maria Chamizo Llatas,
Sridhara Dasu,
Ulrich Heintz,
Emilio A. Nanni,
John Power,
Stephen Wagner
Abstract:
A summary of the Snowmass 2021 e$^+$e$^-$-Collider Forum discussions, white papers submitted to the Snowmass 2021 community study, submissions of the Energy Frontier (EF) subgroups and the Accelerator Frontier (AF) Integrated Task Force (ITF) are presented.
A summary of the Snowmass 2021 e$^+$e$^-$-Collider Forum discussions, white papers submitted to the Snowmass 2021 community study, submissions of the Energy Frontier (EF) subgroups and the Accelerator Frontier (AF) Integrated Task Force (ITF) are presented.
△ Less
Submitted 7 September, 2022;
originally announced September 2022.
-
Future Circular Lepton Collider FCC-ee: Overview and Status
Authors:
I. Agapov,
M. Benedikt,
A. Blondel,
M. Boscolo,
O. Brunner,
M. Chamizo Llatas,
T. Charles,
D. Denisov,
W. Fischer,
E. Gianfelice-Wendt,
J. Gutleber,
P. Janot,
M. Koratzinos,
R. Losito,
S. Nagaitsev,
K. Oide,
T. Raubenheimer,
R. Rimmer,
J. Seeman,
D. Shatilov,
V. Shiltsev,
M. Sullivan,
U. Wienands,
F. Zimmermann
Abstract:
The worldwide High Energy Physics community widely agrees that the next collider should be a Higgs factory. Acknowledging this priority, in 2021 CERN has launched the international Future Circular Collider (FCC) Feasibility Study (FS). The FCC Integrated Project foresees, in a first stage, a high-luminosity high-energy electron-positron collider, serving as Higgs, top and electroweak factory, and,…
▽ More
The worldwide High Energy Physics community widely agrees that the next collider should be a Higgs factory. Acknowledging this priority, in 2021 CERN has launched the international Future Circular Collider (FCC) Feasibility Study (FS). The FCC Integrated Project foresees, in a first stage, a high-luminosity high-energy electron-positron collider, serving as Higgs, top and electroweak factory, and, in a second stage, an energy frontier hadron collider, with a centre-of-mass energy of at least 100 TeV. In this paper, we address a few key elements of the FCC-ee accelerator design, its performance reach, and underlying technologies, as requested by the Snowmass process. The Conceptual Design Report for the FCC, published in 2019, serves as our primary reference. We also summarize a few recent changes and improvements.
△ Less
Submitted 15 March, 2022;
originally announced March 2022.
-
Future High Energy Circular e+e- Collider using Energy-Recovery Linacs
Authors:
Vladimir N Litvinenko,
Thomas Roser,
Maria Chamizo Llatas
Abstract:
In this paper we present alternative approach for Future Circular electron-positron Collider. Current 100 km circumference design with the top CM energy of 365 GeV (182.5 GeV beam energy) is based on two storage rings to circulate colliding beams. One of the ring-ring design shortcomings is enormous power consumption needed to compensate for 100 MW of the beam energy losses for synchrotron radiati…
▽ More
In this paper we present alternative approach for Future Circular electron-positron Collider. Current 100 km circumference design with the top CM energy of 365 GeV (182.5 GeV beam energy) is based on two storage rings to circulate colliding beams. One of the ring-ring design shortcomings is enormous power consumption needed to compensate for 100 MW of the beam energy losses for synchrotron radiation. We propose to use energy recovery linac located in the same tunnel to mitigate this drawback. We show in this paper that our approach would allow a significant, up to an order of magnitude, reduction of the beam energy losses while maintaining high luminosity in this collider at high energies. Furthermore, our approach would allow to extend CM energy to 500 GeV (or above), which is sufficient for double Higgs production.
△ Less
Submitted 10 September, 2019;
originally announced September 2019.
-
Observation of the rare $B^0_s\toμ^+μ^-$ decay from the combined analysis of CMS and LHCb data
Authors:
The CMS,
LHCb Collaborations,
:,
V. Khachatryan,
A. M. Sirunyan,
A. Tumasyan,
W. Adam,
T. Bergauer,
M. Dragicevic,
J. Erö,
M. Friedl,
R. Frühwirth,
V. M. Ghete,
C. Hartl,
N. Hörmann,
J. Hrubec,
M. Jeitler,
W. Kiesenhofer,
V. Knünz,
M. Krammer,
I. Krätschmer,
D. Liko,
I. Mikulec,
D. Rabady,
B. Rahbaran
, et al. (2807 additional authors not shown)
Abstract:
A joint measurement is presented of the branching fractions $B^0_s\toμ^+μ^-$ and $B^0\toμ^+μ^-$ in proton-proton collisions at the LHC by the CMS and LHCb experiments. The data samples were collected in 2011 at a centre-of-mass energy of 7 TeV, and in 2012 at 8 TeV. The combined analysis produces the first observation of the $B^0_s\toμ^+μ^-$ decay, with a statistical significance exceeding six sta…
▽ More
A joint measurement is presented of the branching fractions $B^0_s\toμ^+μ^-$ and $B^0\toμ^+μ^-$ in proton-proton collisions at the LHC by the CMS and LHCb experiments. The data samples were collected in 2011 at a centre-of-mass energy of 7 TeV, and in 2012 at 8 TeV. The combined analysis produces the first observation of the $B^0_s\toμ^+μ^-$ decay, with a statistical significance exceeding six standard deviations, and the best measurement of its branching fraction so far. Furthermore, evidence for the $B^0\toμ^+μ^-$ decay is obtained with a statistical significance of three standard deviations. The branching fraction measurements are statistically compatible with SM predictions and impose stringent constraints on several theories beyond the SM.
△ Less
Submitted 17 August, 2015; v1 submitted 17 November, 2014;
originally announced November 2014.
