-
A Longitudinal Analysis of Experiences with Semaglutide Across Twitter User Subpopulations
Authors:
Parisa Momeni,
Gabriel Laverghetta,
Jay Ligatti,
Lingyao Li
Abstract:
User experience significantly impacts pharmaceutical drug effectiveness. Social media platforms, particularly Twitter (now X), have become prominent venues for individuals to share medication-related experiences. This is especially true for semaglutide, a widely marketed drug that has sparked substantial public discourse. Despite the volume of conversation, a comprehensive understanding of how dif…
▽ More
User experience significantly impacts pharmaceutical drug effectiveness. Social media platforms, particularly Twitter (now X), have become prominent venues for individuals to share medication-related experiences. This is especially true for semaglutide, a widely marketed drug that has sparked substantial public discourse. Despite the volume of conversation, a comprehensive understanding of how different user subpopulations engage with these discussions remains limited. Understanding such nuanced reactions is crucial for identifying public concerns, addressing misconceptions, and improving health communication. We analyzed 859,751 semaglutide-related tweets collected from July 2021 to April 2024, using sentiment and topic modeling to explore how the drug is perceived across user groups. We applied advanced analytical tools, including RoBERTa and BERTopic, to uncover trends and insights. To our knowledge, this is the most comprehensive sentiment and topic modeling analysis of semaglutide discourse on Twitter. Findings reveal significant sentiment differences across subpopulations: organizational accounts expressed less negative sentiment (mean -0.014) than individuals (-0.24), especially regarding efficacy and regulatory issues. Sentiment declined notably from Nov 2022 to Jan 2023, coinciding with regulatory alerts. Negativity clustered around access and side effects; positivity stemmed from success stories and endorsements. Female users engaged more with celebrity/political discussions (19.24% vs. 14.6% for males), while males showed slightly higher positivity overall. These insights inform healthcare communication and pharmacovigilance. All data were public and anonymized to ensure privacy and ethical compliance.
△ Less
Submitted 23 May, 2025;
originally announced May 2025.
-
Toward satisfactory public accessibility: A crowdsourcing approach through online reviews to inclusive urban design
Authors:
Lingyao Li,
Songhua Hu,
Yinpei Dai,
Min Deng,
Parisa Momeni,
Gabriel Laverghetta,
Lizhou Fan,
Zihui Ma,
Xi Wang,
Siyuan Ma,
Jay Ligatti,
Libby Hemphill
Abstract:
As urban populations grow, the need for accessible urban design has become urgent. Traditional survey methods for assessing public perceptions of accessibility are often limited in scope. Crowdsourcing via online reviews offers a valuable alternative to understanding public perceptions, and advancements in large language models can facilitate their use. This study uses Google Maps reviews across t…
▽ More
As urban populations grow, the need for accessible urban design has become urgent. Traditional survey methods for assessing public perceptions of accessibility are often limited in scope. Crowdsourcing via online reviews offers a valuable alternative to understanding public perceptions, and advancements in large language models can facilitate their use. This study uses Google Maps reviews across the United States and fine-tunes Llama 3 model with the Low-Rank Adaptation technique to analyze public sentiment on accessibility. At the POI level, most categories -- restaurants, retail, hotels, and healthcare -- show negative sentiments. Socio-spatial analysis reveals that areas with higher proportions of white residents and greater socioeconomic status report more positive sentiment, while areas with more elderly, highly-educated residents exhibit more negative sentiment. Interestingly, no clear link is found between the presence of disabilities and public sentiments. Overall, this study highlights the potential of crowdsourcing for identifying accessibility challenges and providing insights for urban planners.
△ Less
Submitted 12 September, 2024;
originally announced September 2024.
-
A Preliminary Study on Using Large Language Models in Software Pentesting
Authors:
Kumar Shashwat,
Francis Hahn,
Xinming Ou,
Dmitry Goldgof,
Lawrence Hall,
Jay Ligatti,
S. Raj Rajgopalan,
Armin Ziaie Tabari
Abstract:
Large language models (LLM) are perceived to offer promising potentials for automating security tasks, such as those found in security operation centers (SOCs). As a first step towards evaluating this perceived potential, we investigate the use of LLMs in software pentesting, where the main task is to automatically identify software security vulnerabilities in source code. We hypothesize that an L…
▽ More
Large language models (LLM) are perceived to offer promising potentials for automating security tasks, such as those found in security operation centers (SOCs). As a first step towards evaluating this perceived potential, we investigate the use of LLMs in software pentesting, where the main task is to automatically identify software security vulnerabilities in source code. We hypothesize that an LLM-based AI agent can be improved over time for a specific security task as human operators interact with it. Such improvement can be made, as a first step, by engineering prompts fed to the LLM based on the responses produced, to include relevant contexts and structures so that the model provides more accurate results. Such engineering efforts become sustainable if the prompts that are engineered to produce better results on current tasks, also produce better results on future unknown tasks. To examine this hypothesis, we utilize the OWASP Benchmark Project 1.2 which contains 2,740 hand-crafted source code test cases containing various types of vulnerabilities. We divide the test cases into training and testing data, where we engineer the prompts based on the training data (only), and evaluate the final system on the testing data. We compare the AI agent's performance on the testing data against the performance of the agent without the prompt engineering. We also compare the AI agent's results against those from SonarQube, a widely used static code analyzer for security testing. We built and tested multiple versions of the AI agent using different off-the-shelf LLMs -- Google's Gemini-pro, as well as OpenAI's GPT-3.5-Turbo and GPT-4-Turbo (with both chat completion and assistant APIs). The results show that using LLMs is a viable approach to build an AI agent for software pentesting that can improve through repeated use and prompt engineering.
△ Less
Submitted 30 January, 2024;
originally announced January 2024.
