-
Hot-Cold Spots in Italian Macroseismic Data
Authors:
G. Molchan,
T. Kronrod,
G. F. Panza
Abstract:
The site effect is usually associated with local geological conditions, which increase or decrease the level of shaking compared with standard attenuation relations. We made an attempt to see in the macroseismic data of Italy some other effects, namely, hot/cold spots in the terminology of Olsen (2000), which are related to local fault geometry rather than to soil conditions. We give a list of tow…
▽ More
The site effect is usually associated with local geological conditions, which increase or decrease the level of shaking compared with standard attenuation relations. We made an attempt to see in the macroseismic data of Italy some other effects, namely, hot/cold spots in the terminology of Olsen (2000), which are related to local fault geometry rather than to soil conditions. We give a list of towns and villages liable to amplify (+) or to reduce (-) the level of shaking in comparison with the nearby settlements. Relief and soil conditions cannot always account for the anomalous sites. Further, there are sites where both (+) and (-) effects are observed depending on the earthquake. The opposite effects can be generated by events from the same seismotectonic zone and along the same direction to the site. Anomalous sites may group themselves into clusters of different scales. All isolated anomalous patterns presented in this paper can be used in hazard analysis, in particular, for the modeling and testing of seismic effects.
△ Less
Submitted 5 July, 2010;
originally announced July 2010.
-
Shape of Empirical and Synthetic Isoseismals: Comparison for Italian M \le 6 Earthquakes
Authors:
G. M. Molchan,
T. L. Kronrod,
G. F. Panza
Abstract:
We present results from a comparative analysis of empirical and synthetic shapes for isoseismals of low intensity (I = IV-VI on the MCS scale) for six Italian earthquakes of ML = 4.5-6. Our modelling of isoseismals is based on a plane stratified earth model and on the dou-ble-couple point source approximation to calculate seismograms in the frequency range f =< 1 Hz. With a minimum of parameter va…
▽ More
We present results from a comparative analysis of empirical and synthetic shapes for isoseismals of low intensity (I = IV-VI on the MCS scale) for six Italian earthquakes of ML = 4.5-6. Our modelling of isoseismals is based on a plane stratified earth model and on the dou-ble-couple point source approximation to calculate seismograms in the frequency range f =< 1 Hz. With a minimum of parameter variation we demonstrate that the low intensity isoseismals provide information on source geometry. We strive to avoid subjectivity in isoseismal construc-tions by using the new Diffuse Boundary method, which visualizes isoseismals with their uncer-tainty. Similar results in this direction are known for large earthquakes (ML ~ 6 or greater) with extended sources and for the higher isoseismals (I >= VI on the MM scale). The latter studies disregard the earth structure, use a greater number of parameters, and therefore have greater possibilities for fitting the data than our approach.
△ Less
Submitted 5 July, 2010;
originally announced July 2010.
-
Seismic Interevent Time: A Spatial Scaling and Multifractality
Authors:
G. Molchan,
T. Kronrod
Abstract:
The optimal scaling problem for the time t(LxL) between two successive events in a seismogenic cell of size L is considered. The quantity t(LxL) is defined for a random cell of a grid covering a seismic region G. We solve that problem in terms of a multifractal characteristic of epicenters in G known as the tau-function or generalized fractal dimensions; the solution depends on the type of cell…
▽ More
The optimal scaling problem for the time t(LxL) between two successive events in a seismogenic cell of size L is considered. The quantity t(LxL) is defined for a random cell of a grid covering a seismic region G. We solve that problem in terms of a multifractal characteristic of epicenters in G known as the tau-function or generalized fractal dimensions; the solution depends on the type of cell randomization. Our theoretical deductions are corroborated by California seismicity with magnitude M>2. In other words, the population of waiting time distributions for L = 10-100 km provides positive information on the multifractal nature of seismicity, which impedes the population to be converted into a unified law by scaling. This study is a follow-up of our analysis of power/unified laws for seismicity (see PAGEOPH 162 (2005), 1135 and GJI 162 (2005), 899).
△ Less
Submitted 11 January, 2006; v1 submitted 29 December, 2005;
originally announced December 2005.
-
On the Spatial Scaling of Seismicity Rate
Authors:
G. Molchan,
T. Kronrod
Abstract:
Scaling analysis of seismicity in the space-time-magnitude domain very often starts from the relation N(m,L)=a(L)*10**(-bm)*L**c for the rate of seismic events of magnitude M>m in an area of size L. There is some evidence in favor of multifractality being present in seismicity. In this case the optimal choice of the scale exponent c is not unique. It is shown how different c's are related to dif…
▽ More
Scaling analysis of seismicity in the space-time-magnitude domain very often starts from the relation N(m,L)=a(L)*10**(-bm)*L**c for the rate of seismic events of magnitude M>m in an area of size L. There is some evidence in favor of multifractality being present in seismicity. In this case the optimal choice of the scale exponent c is not unique. It is shown how different c's are related to different types of spatial averaging applied to N(m,L) and what are the c's for which the distributions of a(L) best agree for small L. Theoretical analysis is tested using California data.
△ Less
Submitted 11 January, 2006; v1 submitted 3 November, 2005;
originally announced November 2005.
-
On the Frequency-magnitude Law for Fractal Seismicity
Authors:
G. Molchan,
T. Kronrod
Abstract:
Scaling analysis of seismicity in the space-time-magnitude domain very often starts from the relation N(m,L)=a(L)*10**(-bm)*L**c for the rate of seismic events of magnitude M>m in an area of size L. There are some evidences in favor of multifractal property of seismic process. In this case the choice of the scale exponent 'c' is not unique. It is shown how different 'c''s are related to differen…
▽ More
Scaling analysis of seismicity in the space-time-magnitude domain very often starts from the relation N(m,L)=a(L)*10**(-bm)*L**c for the rate of seismic events of magnitude M>m in an area of size L. There are some evidences in favor of multifractal property of seismic process. In this case the choice of the scale exponent 'c' is not unique. It is shown how different 'c''s are related to different types of spatial averaging applied to lambda(m, L) and what are the 'c''s for which the distributions of a(L) best agree for small L. Theoretical analysis is supplemented with an analysis of California data for which the above issues were recently discussed on an empirical level.
△ Less
Submitted 27 September, 2004;
originally announced September 2004.
