D-Band 2D MIMO FMCW Radar System Design for Indoor Wireless Sensing
Authors:
Subbarao Korlapati,
Reza Nikandish
Abstract:
In this article, we present system design of D-band multi-input multi-output (MIMO) frequency-modulated continuous-wave (FMCW) radar for indoor wireless sensing. A uniform rectangular array (URA) of radar elements is used for 2D direction-of-arrival (DOA) estimation. The DOA estimation accuracy of the MIMO radar array in the presence of noise is evaluated using the multiple-signal classification (…
▽ More
In this article, we present system design of D-band multi-input multi-output (MIMO) frequency-modulated continuous-wave (FMCW) radar for indoor wireless sensing. A uniform rectangular array (URA) of radar elements is used for 2D direction-of-arrival (DOA) estimation. The DOA estimation accuracy of the MIMO radar array in the presence of noise is evaluated using the multiple-signal classification (MUSIC) and the minimum variance distortionless response (MVDR) algorithms. We investigate different scaling scenarios for the radar receiver (RX) SNR and the transmitter (TX) output power with the target distance. The DOA estimation algorithm providing the highest accuracy and shortest simulation time is shown to depend on the size of the radar array. Specifically, for a 64-element array, the MUSIC achieves lower root-mean-square error (RMSE) compared to the MVDR across 1--10\,m indoor distances and 0--30\,dB SNR (e.g., $\rm 0.8^{\circ}$/$\rm 0.3^{\circ}$ versus $\rm 1.0^{\circ}$/$\rm 0.5^{\circ}$ at 10/20\,dB SNR and 5\,m distance) and 0.5x simulation time. For a 16-element array, the two algorithms provide comparable performance, while for a 4-element array, the MVDR outperforms the MUSIC by a large margin (e.g., $\rm 8.3^{\circ}$/$\rm 3.8^{\circ}$ versus $\rm 62.2^{\circ}$/$\rm 48.8^{\circ}$ at 10/20\,dB SNR and 5\,m distance) and 0.8x simulation time. Furthermore, the TX output power requirement of the radar array is investigated in free-space and through-wall wireless sensing scenarios, and is benchmarked by the state-of-the-art D-band on-chip radars.
△ Less
Submitted 4 March, 2024; v1 submitted 29 September, 2023;
originally announced September 2023.
CrackSeg9k: A Collection and Benchmark for Crack Segmentation Datasets and Frameworks
Authors:
Shreyas Kulkarni,
Shreyas Singh,
Dhananjay Balakrishnan,
Siddharth Sharma,
Saipraneeth Devunuri,
Sai Chowdeswara Rao Korlapati
Abstract:
The detection of cracks is a crucial task in monitoring structural health and ensuring structural safety. The manual process of crack detection is time-consuming and subjective to the inspectors. Several researchers have tried tackling this problem using traditional Image Processing or learning-based techniques. However, their scope of work is limited to detecting cracks on a single type of surfac…
▽ More
The detection of cracks is a crucial task in monitoring structural health and ensuring structural safety. The manual process of crack detection is time-consuming and subjective to the inspectors. Several researchers have tried tackling this problem using traditional Image Processing or learning-based techniques. However, their scope of work is limited to detecting cracks on a single type of surface (walls, pavements, glass, etc.). The metrics used to evaluate these methods are also varied across the literature, making it challenging to compare techniques. This paper addresses these problems by combining previously available datasets and unifying the annotations by tackling the inherent problems within each dataset, such as noise and distortions. We also present a pipeline that combines Image Processing and Deep Learning models. Finally, we benchmark the results of proposed models on these metrics on our new dataset and compare them with state-of-the-art models in the literature.
△ Less
Submitted 27 August, 2022;
originally announced August 2022.
