Showing 1–2 of 2 results for author: Kochalski, K D
-
Critical fluid limit of a gated processor sharing queue
Authors:
H. Christian Gromoll,
Katelynn D. Kochalski
Abstract:
We consider a sequence of single-server queueing models operating under a service policy that incorporates batches into processor sharing: arriving jobs build up behind a gate while waiting to begin service, while jobs in front of the gate are served according to processor sharing. When they have been completed, the waiting jobs move in front of the gate and the cycle repeats. We model this system…
▽ More
We consider a sequence of single-server queueing models operating under a service policy that incorporates batches into processor sharing: arriving jobs build up behind a gate while waiting to begin service, while jobs in front of the gate are served according to processor sharing. When they have been completed, the waiting jobs move in front of the gate and the cycle repeats. We model this system with a pair of measure valued processes describing the jobs in front of and behind the gate. Under mild asymptotically critical conditions and a law-of-large-numbers scaling, we prove that the pair of measure-valued processes converges in distribution to an easily described limit, which has an interesting periodic dynamics.
△ Less
Submitted 13 February, 2023;
originally announced February 2023.
-
Strategy-indifferent games of best choice
Authors:
Brant Jones,
Katelynn D. Kochalski,
Sarah Loeb,
Julia C. Walk
Abstract:
The game of best choice (or "secretary problem") is a model for making an irrevocable decision among a fixed number of candidate choices that are presented sequentially in random order, one at a time. Because the classically optimal solution is known to reject an initial sequence of candidates, a paradox emerges from the fact that candidates have an incentive to position themselves immediately aft…
▽ More
The game of best choice (or "secretary problem") is a model for making an irrevocable decision among a fixed number of candidate choices that are presented sequentially in random order, one at a time. Because the classically optimal solution is known to reject an initial sequence of candidates, a paradox emerges from the fact that candidates have an incentive to position themselves immediately after this cutoff which challenges the assumption that candidates arrive in uniformly random order.
One way to resolve this is to consider games for which every (reasonable) strategy results in the same probability of success. In this work, we classify these "strategy-indifferent" games of best choice. It turns out that the probability of winning such a game is essentially the reciprocal of the expected number of left-to-right maxima in the full collection of candidate rank orderings. We present some examples of these games based on avoiding permutation patterns of size 3, which involves computing the distribution of left-to-right maxima in each of these pattern classes.
△ Less
Submitted 13 July, 2021; v1 submitted 10 July, 2021;
originally announced July 2021.
