A probabilistic model for pedestrian gap acceptance behavior at uncontrolled midblock crosswalks
Authors:
Ali Mansour Khaki,
Amin Mohammadnazar
Abstract:
A significant number of those killed in traffic accidents annually refers to pedestrians. most of these accidents occur when a pedestrian is going to pass the street. One of the most hazardous areas for pedestrians crossing the street is midblock crosswalks. These areas are often uncontrolled and there is no separated phase for pedestrian crossing. As a result, using created gaps among vehicles is…
▽ More
A significant number of those killed in traffic accidents annually refers to pedestrians. most of these accidents occur when a pedestrian is going to pass the street. One of the most hazardous areas for pedestrians crossing the street is midblock crosswalks. These areas are often uncontrolled and there is no separated phase for pedestrian crossing. As a result, using created gaps among vehicles is often the only opportunity for pedestrians to cross the street. This research aims to investigate effective factors on pedestrian gap acceptance at uncontrolled mid-block crosswalks. In this regard, several variables such as individual, environmental, and traffic variables were considered and their related data were extracted by filming the location. from video images, they were analyzed using logit regression model and the behavior After extracting the data of pedestrian while he is crossing the street was modeled as the probabilistic function of pedestrian gap acceptance. The results illustrate that conflict flow rate, the temporal gap among vehicles, and driver yielding in the face of vehicles are the most important effective factors on pedestrian behavior. The other one is that the speed and type of vehicles do not affect the pedestrian's decision about rejecting or accepting the gap. The results also show that individual characteristics such as age and gender of pedestrians do not make a significant relationship with pedestrian gap acceptance.
△ Less
Submitted 24 January, 2021;
originally announced January 2021.
Measuring Personalization of Web Search
Authors:
Anikó Hannák,
Piotr Sapieżyński,
Arash Molavi Khaki,
David Lazer,
Alan Mislove,
Christo Wilson
Abstract:
Web search is an integral part of our daily lives. Recently, there has been a trend of personalization in Web search, where different users receive different results for the same search query. The increasing level of personalization is leading to concerns about Filter Bubble effects, where certain users are simply unable to access information that the search engines' algorithm decides is irrelevan…
▽ More
Web search is an integral part of our daily lives. Recently, there has been a trend of personalization in Web search, where different users receive different results for the same search query. The increasing level of personalization is leading to concerns about Filter Bubble effects, where certain users are simply unable to access information that the search engines' algorithm decides is irrelevant. Despite these concerns, there has been little quantification of the extent of personalization in Web search today, or the user attributes that cause it.
In light of this situation, we make three contributions. First, we develop a methodology for measuring personalization in Web search results. While conceptually simple, there are numerous details that our methodology must handle in order to accurately attribute differences in search results to personalization. Second, we apply our methodology to 200 users on Google Web Search and 100 users on Bing. We find that, on average, 11.7% of results show differences due to personalization on Google, while 15.8% of results are personalized on Bing, but that this varies widely by search query and by result ranking. Third, we investigate the user features used to personalize on Google Web Search and Bing. Surprisingly, we only find measurable personalization as a result of searching with a logged in account and the IP address of the searching user. Our results are a first step towards understanding the extent and effects of personalization on Web search engines today.
△ Less
Submitted 15 June, 2017;
originally announced June 2017.
