The Past, Present, and Future of the Brain Imaging Data Structure (BIDS)
Authors:
Russell A. Poldrack,
Christopher J. Markiewicz,
Stefan Appelhoff,
Yoni K. Ashar,
Tibor Auer,
Sylvain Baillet,
Shashank Bansal,
Leandro Beltrachini,
Christian G. Benar,
Giacomo Bertazzoli,
Suyash Bhogawar,
Ross W. Blair,
Marta Bortoletto,
Mathieu Boudreau,
Teon L. Brooks,
Vince D. Calhoun,
Filippo Maria Castelli,
Patricia Clement,
Alexander L Cohen,
Julien Cohen-Adad,
Sasha D'Ambrosio,
Gilles de Hollander,
María de la iglesia-Vayá,
Alejandro de la Vega,
Arnaud Delorme
, et al. (89 additional authors not shown)
Abstract:
The Brain Imaging Data Structure (BIDS) is a community-driven standard for the organization of data and metadata from a growing range of neuroscience modalities. This paper is meant as a history of how the standard has developed and grown over time. We outline the principles behind the project, the mechanisms by which it has been extended, and some of the challenges being addressed as it evolves.…
▽ More
The Brain Imaging Data Structure (BIDS) is a community-driven standard for the organization of data and metadata from a growing range of neuroscience modalities. This paper is meant as a history of how the standard has developed and grown over time. We outline the principles behind the project, the mechanisms by which it has been extended, and some of the challenges being addressed as it evolves. We also discuss the lessons learned through the project, with the aim of enabling researchers in other domains to learn from the success of BIDS.
△ Less
Submitted 8 January, 2024; v1 submitted 11 September, 2023;
originally announced September 2023.
CG-SENSE revisited: Results from the first ISMRM reproducibility challenge
Authors:
Oliver Maier,
Steven H. Baete,
Alexander Fyrdahl,
Kerstin Hammernik,
Seb Harrevelt,
Lars Kasper,
Agah Karakuzu,
Michael Loecher,
Franz Patzig,
Ye Tian,
Ke Wang,
Daniel Gallichan,
Martin Uecker,
Florian Knoll
Abstract:
Purpose: The aim of this work is to shed light on the issue of reproducibility in MR image reconstruction in the context of a challenge. Participants had to recreate the results of "Advances in sensitivity encoding with arbitrary k-space trajectories" by Pruessmann et al.
Methods: The task of the challenge was to reconstruct radially acquired multi-coil k-space data (brain/heart) following the m…
▽ More
Purpose: The aim of this work is to shed light on the issue of reproducibility in MR image reconstruction in the context of a challenge. Participants had to recreate the results of "Advances in sensitivity encoding with arbitrary k-space trajectories" by Pruessmann et al.
Methods: The task of the challenge was to reconstruct radially acquired multi-coil k-space data (brain/heart) following the method in the original paper, reproducing its key figures. Results were compared to consolidated reference implementations created after the challenge, accounting for the two most common programming languages used in the submissions (Matlab/Python).
Results: Visually, differences between submissions were small. Pixel-wise differences originated from image orientation, assumed field-of-view or resolution. The reference implementations were in good agreement, both visually and in terms of image similarity metrics.
Discussion and Conclusion: While the description level of the published algorithm enabled participants to reproduce CG-SENSE in general, details of the implementation varied, e.g., density compensation or Tikhonov regularization. Implicit assumptions about the data lead to further differences, emphasizing the importance of sufficient meta-data accompanying open data sets. Defining reproducibility quantitatively turned out to be non-trivial for this image reconstruction challenge, in the absence of ground-truth results. Typical similarity measures like NMSE of SSIM were misled by image intensity scaling and outlier pixels. Thus, to facilitate reproducibility, researchers are encouraged to publish code and data alongside the original paper. Future methodological papers on MR image reconstruction might benefit from the consolidated reference implementations of CG-SENSE presented here, as a benchmark for methods comparison.
△ Less
Submitted 10 August, 2020;
originally announced August 2020.
