-
Restate the reference for EEG microstate analysis
Authors:
Shiang Hu,
Esin Karahan,
Pedro A. Valdes-Sosa
Abstract:
Despite the decades of efforts, the choice of EEG reference is still a debated fundamental issue. Non-neutral reference can inevitably inject the uncontrolled temporal biases into all EEG recordings, which may influence the spatiotemporal analysis of brain activity. A method, termed microstates, identifying spatiotemporal EEG features as the quasi-stable topography states in milliseconds, suggests…
▽ More
Despite the decades of efforts, the choice of EEG reference is still a debated fundamental issue. Non-neutral reference can inevitably inject the uncontrolled temporal biases into all EEG recordings, which may influence the spatiotemporal analysis of brain activity. A method, termed microstates, identifying spatiotemporal EEG features as the quasi-stable topography states in milliseconds, suggests its potential as biomarkers of neurophysiological disease. As reference electrode standardization technique (REST) could reconstruct an infinity reference approximately, it is a question whether REST or the other references will be more reliable than average reference (AR) for the microstates analysis. In this study, we design the microstate-based EEG forward model, and apply different references for microstates analysis. The spatial similarity between the generated and assumed cluster maps is mainly investigated. Furthermore, the real EEG data by the parametric bootstrap method is used to validate the performance of the references. Finally, we find that REST is robust to recover more similar cluster maps to the assumption than AR in the simulation, and the cluster maps between REST and AR on the real EEG data are quite different. This study may indicate that REST contributes to identifying more objective microstates features than AR.
△ Less
Submitted 7 February, 2018;
originally announced February 2018.
-
Critical comments on EEG sensor space dynamical connectivity analysis
Authors:
Frederik van de Steen,
Luca Faes,
Esin Karahan,
Jitkomut Songsiri,
Pedro Antonio Valdes Sosa,
Daniele Marinazzo
Abstract:
Many different analysis techniques have been developed and applied to EEG recordings that allow one to investigate how different brain areas interact. One particular class of methods, based on the linear parametric representation of multiple interacting time series, is widely used to study causal connectivity in the brain. However, the results obtained by these methods should be interpreted with g…
▽ More
Many different analysis techniques have been developed and applied to EEG recordings that allow one to investigate how different brain areas interact. One particular class of methods, based on the linear parametric representation of multiple interacting time series, is widely used to study causal connectivity in the brain. However, the results obtained by these methods should be interpreted with great care. The goal of this paper is to show, both theoretically and using simulations, that results obtained by applying causal connectivity measures on the sensor (scalp) time series do not allow interpretation in terms of interacting brain sources. This is because 1) the channel locations cannot be seen as an approximation of a source's anatomical location and 2) spurious connectivity can occur between sensors. Although many measures of causal connectivity derived from EEG sensor time series are affected by the latter, here we will focus on the well-known time domain index of Granger causality (GC) and on the frequency domain directed transfer function (DTF). Using the state-space framework and designing two simulation studies we show that mixing effects caused by volume conduction can lead to spurious connections, detected either by time domain GC or by DTF. Therefore, GC/DTF causal connectivity measures should be computed at the source level, or derived within analysis frameworks that model the effects of volume conduction. Since mixing effects can also occur in the source space, it is advised to combine source space analysis with connectivity measures that are robust to mixing.
△ Less
Submitted 8 November, 2016; v1 submitted 13 July, 2016;
originally announced July 2016.
-
Tensor Analysis and Fusion of Multimodal Brain Images
Authors:
Esin Karahan,
Pedro A. Rojas-Lopez,
Maria L. Bringas-Vega,
Pedro A. Valdes-Hernandez,
Pedro A. Valdes-Sosa
Abstract:
Current high-throughput data acquisition technologies probe dynamical systems with different imaging modalities, generating massive data sets at different spatial and temporal resolutions posing challenging problems in multimodal data fusion. A case in point is the attempt to parse out the brain structures and networks that underpin human cognitive processes by analysis of different neuroimaging m…
▽ More
Current high-throughput data acquisition technologies probe dynamical systems with different imaging modalities, generating massive data sets at different spatial and temporal resolutions posing challenging problems in multimodal data fusion. A case in point is the attempt to parse out the brain structures and networks that underpin human cognitive processes by analysis of different neuroimaging modalities (functional MRI, EEG, NIRS etc.). We emphasize that the multimodal, multi-scale nature of neuroimaging data is well reflected by a multi-way (tensor) structure where the underlying processes can be summarized by a relatively small number of components or "atoms". We introduce Markov-Penrose diagrams - an integration of Bayesian DAG and tensor network notation in order to analyze these models. These diagrams not only clarify matrix and tensor EEG and fMRI time/frequency analysis and inverse problems, but also help understand multimodal fusion via Multiway Partial Least Squares and Coupled Matrix-Tensor Factorization. We show here, for the first time, that Granger causal analysis of brain networks is a tensor regression problem, thus allowing the atomic decomposition of brain networks. Analysis of EEG and fMRI recordings shows the potential of the methods and suggests their use in other scientific domains.
△ Less
Submitted 19 June, 2015;
originally announced June 2015.
