Showing 1–50 of 50 results for author: Joosten, J J

Tree Rewriting Calculi for Strictly Positive Logics

Authors: Sofía Santiago-Fernández, David Fernández-Duque, Joost J. Joosten

Abstract: We study strictly positive logics in the language $\mathscr{L}^+$, which constructs formulas from $\top$, propositional variables, conjunction, and diamond modalities. We begin with the base system $\bf K^+$, the strictly positive fragment of polymodal $\bf K$, and examine its extensions obtained by adding axioms such as monotonicity, transitivity, and the hierarchy-sensitive interaction axiom… ▽ More We study strictly positive logics in the language $\mathscr{L}^+$, which constructs formulas from $\top$, propositional variables, conjunction, and diamond modalities. We begin with the base system $\bf K^+$, the strictly positive fragment of polymodal $\bf K$, and examine its extensions obtained by adding axioms such as monotonicity, transitivity, and the hierarchy-sensitive interaction axiom $(\sf J)$, which governs the interplay between modalities of different strengths. The strongest of these systems is the Reflection Calculus ($\bf RC$), which corresponds to the strictly positive fragment of polymodal $\bf GLP$. Our main contribution is a formulation of these logics as tree rewriting systems, establishing both adequacy and completeness through a correspondence between $\mathscr{L}^+$ formulas and inductively defined modal trees. We also provide a normalization of the rewriting process, which has exponential complexity when axiom $(\sf J)$ is absent; otherwise we provide a double-exponential bound. By introducing tree rewriting calculi as practical provability tools for strictly positive logics, we aim to deepen their proof-theoretic analysis and computational applications. △ Less

Submitted 25 April, 2025; originally announced April 2025.

Specification languages for computational laws versus basic legal principles

Authors: Petia Guintchev, Joost J. Joosten, Sofia Santiago Fernández, Eric Sancho Adamson, Aleix Solé Sánchez, Marta Soria Heredia

Abstract: We speak of a \textit{computational law} when that law is intended to be enforced by software through an automated decision-making process. As digital technologies evolve to offer more solutions for public administrations, we see an ever-increasing number of computational laws. Traditionally, law is written in natural language. Computational laws, however, suffer various complications when written… ▽ More We speak of a \textit{computational law} when that law is intended to be enforced by software through an automated decision-making process. As digital technologies evolve to offer more solutions for public administrations, we see an ever-increasing number of computational laws. Traditionally, law is written in natural language. Computational laws, however, suffer various complications when written in natural language, such as underspecification and ambiguity which lead to a diversity of possible interpretations to be made by the coder. These could potentially result into an uneven application of the law. Thus, resorting to formal languages to write computational laws is tempting. However, writing laws in a formal language leads to further complications, for example, incomprehensibility for non-experts, lack of explicit motivation of the decisions made, or difficulties in retrieving the data leading to the outcome. In this paper, we investigate how certain legal principles fare in both scenarios: computational law written in natural language or written in formal language. We use a running example from the European Union's road transport regulation to showcase the tensions arising, and the benefits from each language. △ Less

Submitted 12 March, 2025; originally announced March 2025.

A tree rewriting system for the Reflection Calculus

Authors: Sofía Santiago-Fernández, Joost J. Joosten, David Fernández-Duque

Abstract: The $Reflection$ $Calculus$ ($\mathcal{\mathbf{RC}}$) is the fragment of the polymodal logic $\mathcal{\mathbf{GLP}}$ in the language $L^+$ whose formulas are built up from $\top$ and propositional variables using conjunction and diamond modalities. $\mathcal{\mathbf{RC}}$ is complete with respect to the arithmetical interpretation that associates modalities with reflection principles and has vari… ▽ More The $Reflection$ $Calculus$ ($\mathcal{\mathbf{RC}}$) is the fragment of the polymodal logic $\mathcal{\mathbf{GLP}}$ in the language $L^+$ whose formulas are built up from $\top$ and propositional variables using conjunction and diamond modalities. $\mathcal{\mathbf{RC}}$ is complete with respect to the arithmetical interpretation that associates modalities with reflection principles and has various applications in proof theory, specifically ordinal analysis. We present ${\sf TRC}$, a tree rewriting system that is adequate and complete with respect to $\mathcal{\mathbf{RC}}$, designed to simulate $\mathcal{\mathbf{RC}}$ derivations. ${\sf TRC}$ is based on a given correspondence between formulas of $L^{+}$ and modal trees ${\sf Tree}^{\Diamond}$. Modal trees are presented as an inductive type allowing precise positioning and transformations which give rise to the formal definition of rewriting rules and facilitates formalization in proof assistants. Furthermore, we provide a rewrite normalization theorem for systematic rule application. The normalization of the rewriting process enhances proof search efficiency and facilitates implementation. By providing ${\sf TRC}$ as an efficient provability tool for $\mathcal{\mathbf{RC}}$, we aim to help on the study of various aspects of the logic such as the subformula property and rule admissibility. △ Less

Submitted 18 July, 2024; originally announced July 2024.

Feferman Interpretability

Authors: Joost J. Joosten, Luka Mikec, Albert Visser

Abstract: We introduce a modal logic FIL for Feferman interpretability. In this logic both the provability modality and the interpretability modality can come with a label. This label indicates that in the arithmetical interpretation the axiom set of the underlying base theory is tweaked so as to mimic behaviour of finitely axiomatised theories. The theory with the tweaked axiom set will be extensionally th… ▽ More We introduce a modal logic FIL for Feferman interpretability. In this logic both the provability modality and the interpretability modality can come with a label. This label indicates that in the arithmetical interpretation the axiom set of the underlying base theory is tweaked so as to mimic behaviour of finitely axiomatised theories. The theory with the tweaked axiom set will be extensionally the same as the original theory though this equality will in general not be provable. After providing the logic FIL and proving the arithmetical soundness, we set the logic to work to prove various interpretability principles to be sound in a large variety of (weak) arithmetical theories. In particular, we prove the two series of principles from [GJ20] to be arithmetically sound using FIL. Up to date, the arithmetical soundness of these series had only been proven using the techniques of definable cuts. △ Less

Submitted 26 June, 2024; originally announced June 2024.

Le Nozze di Giustizia. Interactions between Artificial Intelligence, Law, Logic, Language and Computation with some case studies in Traffic Regulations and Health Care

Authors: Joost J. Joosten, Manuela Montoya García

Abstract: An important aim of this paper is to convey some basics of mathematical logic to the legal community working with Artificial Intelligence. After analysing what AI is, we decide to delimit ourselves to rule-based AI leaving Neural Networks and Machine Learning aside. Rule based AI allows for Formal methods which are described in a rudimentary form. We will then see how mathematical logic interacts… ▽ More An important aim of this paper is to convey some basics of mathematical logic to the legal community working with Artificial Intelligence. After analysing what AI is, we decide to delimit ourselves to rule-based AI leaving Neural Networks and Machine Learning aside. Rule based AI allows for Formal methods which are described in a rudimentary form. We will then see how mathematical logic interacts with legal rule-based AI practice. We shall see how mathematical logic imposes limitations and complications to AI applications. We classify the limitations and interactions between mathematical logic and legal AI in three categories: logical, computational and mathematical. The examples to showcase the interactions will largely come from European traffic regulations. The paper closes off with some reflections on how and where AI could be used and on basic mechanisms that shape society. △ Less

Submitted 9 February, 2024; originally announced February 2024.

Strictly Positive Fragments of the Provability Logic of Heyting Arithmetic

Authors: Ana de Almeida Borges, Joost J. Joosten

Abstract: We determine the strictly positive fragment $\mathsf{QPL}^+(\mathsf{HA})$ of the quantified provability logic $\mathsf{QPL}(\mathsf{HA})$ of Heyting Arithmetic. We show that $\mathsf{QPL}^+(\mathsf{HA})$ is decidable and that it coincides with $\mathsf{QPL}^+(\mathsf{PA})$, which is the strictly positive fragment of the quantified provability logic of of Peano Arithmetic. This positively resolves… ▽ More We determine the strictly positive fragment $\mathsf{QPL}^+(\mathsf{HA})$ of the quantified provability logic $\mathsf{QPL}(\mathsf{HA})$ of Heyting Arithmetic. We show that $\mathsf{QPL}^+(\mathsf{HA})$ is decidable and that it coincides with $\mathsf{QPL}^+(\mathsf{PA})$, which is the strictly positive fragment of the quantified provability logic of of Peano Arithmetic. This positively resolves a previous conjecture of the authors. On our way to proving these results, we carve out the strictly positive fragment $\mathsf{PL}^+(\mathsf{HA})$ of the provability logic $\mathsf{PL}(\mathsf{HA})$ of Heyting Arithmetic, provide a simple axiomatization, and prove it to be sound and complete for two types of arithmetical interpretations. The simple fragments presented in this paper should be contrasted with a 2022 result by Mojtahedi, where an axiomatization for $\mathsf{PL}(\mathsf{HA})$ is provided. This axiomatization, although decidable, is of considerable complexity. △ Less

Submitted 22 December, 2023; originally announced December 2023.

Dialogues with algorithms

Authors: Joost J. Joosten

Abstract: In this short paper we focus on human in the loop for rule-based software used for law enforcement. For example, one can think of software that computes fines like tachograph software, software that prepares evidence like DNA sequencing software or social profiling software to patrol in high-risk zones, among others. An important difference between a legal human agent and a software application li… ▽ More In this short paper we focus on human in the loop for rule-based software used for law enforcement. For example, one can think of software that computes fines like tachograph software, software that prepares evidence like DNA sequencing software or social profiling software to patrol in high-risk zones, among others. An important difference between a legal human agent and a software application lies in possible dialogues. A human agent can be interrogated to motivate her decisions. Often such dialogues with software are at the best extremely hard but mostly impossible. We observe that the absence of a dialogue can sincerely violate civil rights and legal principles like, for example, Transparency or Contestability. Thus, possible dialogues with legal algorithms are at the least highly desirable. Futuristic as this may sound, we observe that in various realms of formal methods, such dialogues are easily obtainable. However, this triggers the usual tension between the expressibility of the dialogue language and the feasibility of the corresponding computations. △ Less

Submitted 19 September, 2023; originally announced September 2023.

Model-checking in the Foundations of Algorithmic Law and the Case of Regulation 561

Authors: Moritz Müller, Joost J. Joosten

Abstract: We discuss model-checking problems as formal models of algorithmic law. Specifically, we ask for an algorithmically tractable general purpose model-checking problem that naturally models the European transport Regulation 561, and discuss the reaches and limits of a version of discrete time stopwatch automata. We discuss model-checking problems as formal models of algorithmic law. Specifically, we ask for an algorithmically tractable general purpose model-checking problem that naturally models the European transport Regulation 561, and discuss the reaches and limits of a version of discrete time stopwatch automata. △ Less

Submitted 11 July, 2023; originally announced July 2023.

UTC Time, Formally Verified

Authors: Ana de Almeida Borges, Mireia González Bedmar, Juan Conejero Rodríguez, Eduardo Hermo Reyes, Joaquim Casals Buñuel, Joost J. Joosten

Abstract: FV Time is a small-scale verification project developed in the Coq proof assistant using the Mathematical Components libraries. It is a library for managing conversions between time formats (UTC and timestamps), as well as commonly used functions for time arithmetic. As a library for time conversions, its novelty is the implementation of leap seconds, which are part of the UTC standard but usually… ▽ More FV Time is a small-scale verification project developed in the Coq proof assistant using the Mathematical Components libraries. It is a library for managing conversions between time formats (UTC and timestamps), as well as commonly used functions for time arithmetic. As a library for time conversions, its novelty is the implementation of leap seconds, which are part of the UTC standard but usually not implemented in existing libraries. Since the verified functions of FV Time are reasonably simple yet non-trivial, it nicely illustrates our methodology for verifying software with Coq. In this paper we present a description of the project, emphasizing the main problems faced while developing the library, as well as some general-purpose solutions that were produced as by-products and may be used in other verification projects. These include a refinement package between proof-oriented MathComp numbers and computation-oriented primitive numbers from the Coq standard library, as well as a set of tactics to automatically prove certain decidable statements over finite ranges through brute-force computation. △ Less

Submitted 13 December, 2023; v1 submitted 28 September, 2022; originally announced September 2022.

Journal ref: In Proceedings of the 13th ACM SIGPLAN International Conference on Certified Programs and Proofs (CPP 24), January 15--16, 2024, London, UK. ACM, New York, NY, USA, 12 pages

Arithmetical and Hyperarithmetical Worm Battles

Authors: David Fernández-Duque, Joost J. Joosten, Fedor Pakhomov, Konstnatinos Papafilippou, Andreas Weiermann

Abstract: Japaridze's provability logic $GLP$ has one modality $[n]$ for each natural number and has been used by Beklemishev for a proof theoretic analysis of Peano aritmetic $(PA)$ and related theories. Among other benefits, this analysis yields the so-called Every Worm Dies $(EWD)$ principle, a natural combinatorial statement independent of $PA$. Recently, Beklemishev and Pakhomov have studied notions of… ▽ More Japaridze's provability logic $GLP$ has one modality $[n]$ for each natural number and has been used by Beklemishev for a proof theoretic analysis of Peano aritmetic $(PA)$ and related theories. Among other benefits, this analysis yields the so-called Every Worm Dies $(EWD)$ principle, a natural combinatorial statement independent of $PA$. Recently, Beklemishev and Pakhomov have studied notions of provability corresponding to transfinite modalities in $GLP$. We show that indeed the natural transfinite extension of $GLP$ is sound for this interpretation, and yields independent combinatorial principles for the second order theory $ACA$ of arithmetical comprehension with full induction. We also provide restricted versions of $EWD$ related to the fragments $IΣ_n$ of Peano arithmetic. In order to prove the latter, we show that standard Hardy functions majorize their variants based on tree ordinals. △ Less

Submitted 29 June, 2022; v1 submitted 14 December, 2021; originally announced December 2021.

Comments: 24 pages. Additions have been made for a proof of the equivalence on the variants corresponding to the fragments of $PA$

An Escape from Vardanyan's Theorem

Authors: Ana de Almeida Borges, Joost J. Joosten

Abstract: Vardanyan's Theorems state that $\mathsf{QPL}(\mathsf{PA})$ - the quantified provability logic of Peano Arithmetic - is $Π^0_2$ complete, and in particular that this already holds when the language is restricted to a single unary predicate. Moreover, Visser and de Jonge generalized this result to conclude that it is impossible to computably axiomatize the quantified provability logic of a wide cla… ▽ More Vardanyan's Theorems state that $\mathsf{QPL}(\mathsf{PA})$ - the quantified provability logic of Peano Arithmetic - is $Π^0_2$ complete, and in particular that this already holds when the language is restricted to a single unary predicate. Moreover, Visser and de Jonge generalized this result to conclude that it is impossible to computably axiomatize the quantified provability logic of a wide class of theories. However, the proof of this fact cannot be performed in a strictly positive signature. The system $\mathsf{QRC}_1$ was previously introduced by the authors as a candidate first-order provability logic. Here we generalize the previously available Kripke soundness and completeness proofs, obtaining constant domain completeness. Then we show that $\mathsf{QRC}_1$ is indeed complete with respect to arithmetical semantics. This is achieved via a Solovay-type construction applied to constant domain Kripke models. As corollaries, we see that $\mathsf{QRC}_1$ is the strictly positive fragment of $\mathsf{QGL}$ and a fragment of $\mathsf{QPL}(\mathsf{PA})$. △ Less

Submitted 31 August, 2021; v1 submitted 25 February, 2021; originally announced February 2021.

Comments: Second installment of work presented in arXiv:2003.13651

MSC Class: 03B45; 03B60; 03F03; 03F30; 03F45 (Primary) 03F55 (Secondary)

Journal ref: The Journal of Symbolic Logic 88(4): 1613-1638 (2023)

An overview of Generalised Veltman Semantics

Authors: Joost J. Joosten, Jan Mas Rovira, Luka Mikec, Mladen Vuković

Abstract: Interpretability logics are endowed with relational semantics à la Kripke: Veltman semantics. For certain applications though, this semantics is not fine-grained enough. Back in 1992, in the research group of de Jongh, the notion of generalised Veltman semantics emerged to obtain certain non-derivability results as was first presented by Verbrugge ([76]). It has turned out that this semantics has… ▽ More Interpretability logics are endowed with relational semantics à la Kripke: Veltman semantics. For certain applications though, this semantics is not fine-grained enough. Back in 1992, in the research group of de Jongh, the notion of generalised Veltman semantics emerged to obtain certain non-derivability results as was first presented by Verbrugge ([76]). It has turned out that this semantics has various good properties. In particular, in many cases completeness proofs become simpler and the richer semantics will allow for filtration arguments as opposed to regular Veltman semantics. This paper aims to give an overview of results and applications of Generalised Veltman semantics up to the current date. △ Less

Submitted 9 July, 2020; originally announced July 2020.

MSC Class: 03F45; 03B45

Provability and interpretability logics with restricted realizations

Authors: Thomas F. Icard, Joost J. Joosten

Abstract: The provability logic of a theory T is the set of modal formulas, which under any arithmetical realization are provable in T . We slightly modify this notion by requiring the arithmetical realizations to come from a specified set $Γ$. We make an analogous modification for interpretability logics. This is a paper from 2012. We first studied provability logics with restricted realizations, and show… ▽ More The provability logic of a theory T is the set of modal formulas, which under any arithmetical realization are provable in T . We slightly modify this notion by requiring the arithmetical realizations to come from a specified set $Γ$. We make an analogous modification for interpretability logics. This is a paper from 2012. We first studied provability logics with restricted realizations, and show that for various natural candidates of theory T and restriction set $Γ$, where each sentence in $Γ$ has a well understood (meta)-mathematical content in T, the result is the logic of linear frames. However, for the theory Primitive Recursive Arithmetic (PRA), we define a fragment that gives rise to a more interesting provability logic, by capitalizing on the well-studied relationship between PRA and I$Σ_1$. We then study interpretability logics, obtaining some upper bounds for IL(PRA), whose characterization remains a major open question in interpretability logic. Again this upper bound is closely relatively to linear frames. The technique is also applied to yield the non-trivial result that IL(PRA) $\subset$ ILM. △ Less

Submitted 18 June, 2020; originally announced June 2020.

Journal ref: Notre Dame Journal of Formal Logic, 53 (2), 133-154, 2012

Interpretability in PRA

Authors: Marta Bílková, Dick de Jongh, Joost J. Joosten

Abstract: In this paper from 2009 we study IL(PRA), the interpretability logic of PRA. As PRA is neither an essentially reflexive theory nor finitely axiomatizable, the two known arithmetical completeness results do not apply to PRA: IL(PRA) is not ILM or ILP. IL(PRA) does of course contain all the principles known to be part of IL(All), the interpretability logic of the principles common to all reasonable… ▽ More In this paper from 2009 we study IL(PRA), the interpretability logic of PRA. As PRA is neither an essentially reflexive theory nor finitely axiomatizable, the two known arithmetical completeness results do not apply to PRA: IL(PRA) is not ILM or ILP. IL(PRA) does of course contain all the principles known to be part of IL(All), the interpretability logic of the principles common to all reasonable arithmetical theories. In this paper, we take two arithmetical properties of PRA and see what their consequences in the modal logic IL(PRA) are. These properties are reflected in the so-called Beklemishev Principle B, and Zambella's Principle Z, neither of which is a part of IL(All). Both principles and their interrelation are submitted to a modal study. In particular, we prove a frame condition for B. Moreover, we prove that Z follows from a restricted form of B. Finally, we give an overview of the known relationships of IL(PRA) to important other interpetability principles. △ Less

Submitted 18 June, 2020; originally announced June 2020.

MSC Class: 03F30 03B45 03F30 03B45; 03F30; 03F45

Journal ref: Annals of Pure and Applied Logic 161 (2), 128-138; 2009

The interpretability logic of all reasonable arithmetical theories

Authors: Joost J. Joosten, Albert Visser

Abstract: This paper from 2000 is a presentation of a status quæstionis at that tiime, to wit of the problem of the interpretability logic of {\em all}\/ reasonable arithmetical theories. We present both the arithmetical side and the modal side of the question. This paper from 2000 is a presentation of a status quæstionis at that tiime, to wit of the problem of the interpretability logic of {\em all}\/ reasonable arithmetical theories. We present both the arithmetical side and the modal side of the question. △ Less

Submitted 27 April, 2020; originally announced April 2020.

Journal ref: The Interpretability logic of all reasonable arithmetical theories. Erkenntnis, 53(1-2):3-26; 2000

Hidden variables simulating quantum contextuality increasingly violate the Holevo bound

Authors: Adán Cabello, Joost J. Joosten

Abstract: In this paper from 2011 we approach some questions about quantum contextuality with tools from formal logic. In particular, we consider an experiment associated with the Peres-Mermin square. The language of all possible sequences of outcomes of the experiment is classified in the Chomsky hierarchy and seen to be a regular language. Next, we make the rather evident observation that a finite set of… ▽ More In this paper from 2011 we approach some questions about quantum contextuality with tools from formal logic. In particular, we consider an experiment associated with the Peres-Mermin square. The language of all possible sequences of outcomes of the experiment is classified in the Chomsky hierarchy and seen to be a regular language. Next, we make the rather evident observation that a finite set of hidden finite valued variables can never account for indeterminism in an ideally isolated repeatable experiment. We see that, when the language of possible outcomes of the experiment is regular, as is the case with the Peres-Mermin square, the amount of binary-valued hidden variables needed to de-randomize the model for all sequences of experiments up to length n grows as bad as it could be: linearly in n. We introduce a very abstract model of machine that simulates nature in a particular sense. A lower-bound on the number of memory states of such machines is proved if they were to simulate the experiment that corresponds to the Peres-Mermin square. Moreover, the proof of this lower bound is seen to scale to a certain generalization of the Peres- Mermin square. For this scaled experiment it is seen that the Holevo bound is violated and that the degree of violation increases uniformly. △ Less

Submitted 10 April, 2020; originally announced April 2020.

Journal ref: In Unconventional Computing, Springer LNCS 6714 (64-76), ISSN 0302-9743. Proceedings of the 10th International Conference UC 2011, Turku, Finland 2011

Modal Matters in Interpretability Logics

Authors: Evan Goris, Joost J. Joosten

Abstract: This paper from 2008 is the first in a series of three related papers on modal methods in interpretability logics and applications. In this first paper the foundations are laid for later results. These foundations consist of a thorough treatment of a construction method to obtain modal models. This construction method is used to reprove some known results in the area of interpretability like the m… ▽ More This paper from 2008 is the first in a series of three related papers on modal methods in interpretability logics and applications. In this first paper the foundations are laid for later results. These foundations consist of a thorough treatment of a construction method to obtain modal models. This construction method is used to reprove some known results in the area of interpretability like the modal completeness of the logic ${\textbf{IL}}$. Next, the method is applied to obtain new results: the modal completeness of the logic ${\textbf{IL}}{\sf M_0}$, and modal completeness of ${\textbf{IL}}({\sf W^*})$. △ Less

Submitted 15 April, 2020; originally announced April 2020.

Journal ref: Logic Journal of the Interest Group in Pure and Applied Logic 16: 371-412; 2008

Self Provers and $Σ_1$ Sentences

Authors: Evan Goris, Joost J. Joosten

Abstract: This paper from 2012 is the second in a series of three papers. All three papers deal with interpretability logics and related matters. In the first paper a construction method was exposed to obtain models of these logics. Using this method, we obtained some completeness results, some already known, and some new. In this paper, we will set the construction method to work to obtain more results.… ▽ More This paper from 2012 is the second in a series of three papers. All three papers deal with interpretability logics and related matters. In the first paper a construction method was exposed to obtain models of these logics. Using this method, we obtained some completeness results, some already known, and some new. In this paper, we will set the construction method to work to obtain more results. First, the modal completeness of the logic ${\textbf{IL}}({\sf M})$ is proved using the construction method. This is not a new result, but by using our new proof we can obtain new results. Among these new results are some admissible rules for ${\textbf{IL}}({\sf M})$ and ${\textbf{GL}}$. Moreover, the new proof will be used to classify all the essentially $Δ_1$ and also all the essentially $Σ_1$ formulas of ${\textbf{IL}}({\sf M})$. Closely related to essentially $Σ_1$ sentences are the so-called \emph{self provers}. A self-prover is a formula $\varphi$ which implies its own provability, that is $\varphi \to \Box \varphi$. Each formula $\varphi$ will generate a self prover $\varphi \wedge \Box \varphi$. We will use the construction method to characterize those sentences of ${\textbf{GL}}$ that generate a self prover that is trivial in the sense that it is $Σ_1$. △ Less

Submitted 15 April, 2020; originally announced April 2020.

Journal ref: Logic Journal of the Interest Group in Pure and Applied Logic. 20 (1), 1-21, 2012

A new principle in the interpretability logic of all reasonable arithmetical theories

Authors: Evan Goris, Joost J. Joosten

Abstract: The interpretability logic of a mathematical theory describes the structural behavior of interpretations over that theory. Different theories have different logics. This paper from 2011 revolves around the question what logic describes the behavior that is present in all theories with a minimum amount of arithmetic; the intersection over all such theories so to say. We denote this target logic by… ▽ More The interpretability logic of a mathematical theory describes the structural behavior of interpretations over that theory. Different theories have different logics. This paper from 2011 revolves around the question what logic describes the behavior that is present in all theories with a minimum amount of arithmetic; the intersection over all such theories so to say. We denote this target logic by ${\textbf{IL}}({\rm All})$. In this paper we present a new principle $\sf R$ in ${\textbf{IL}}({\rm All})$. We show that $\sf R$ does not follow from the logic ${\textbf{IL}}{\sf P_0W^*}$ that contains all previously known principles. This is done by providing a modal incompleteness proof of ${\textbf{IL}}{\sf P_0W^*}$: showing that $\sf R$ follows semantically but not syntactically from ${\textbf{IL}}{\sf P_0W^*}$. Apart from giving the incompleteness proof by elementary methods, we also sketch how to work with so-called Generalized Veltman Semantics as to establish incompleteness. To this extent, a new version of this Generalized Veltman Semantics is defined and studied. Moreover, for the important principles the frame correspondences are calculated. After the modal results it is shown that the new principle $\sf R$ is indeed valid in any arithmetically theory. The proof employs some elementary results on definable cuts in arithmetical theories. △ Less

Submitted 15 April, 2020; originally announced April 2020.

Journal ref: Logic Journal of the Interest Group in Pure and Applied Logic 19 (1), 1-19, 2011

The closed fragment of IL is PSPACE hard

Authors: Félix Bou, Joost J. Joosten

Abstract: In this paper from 2011 we consider $\textbf{IL}_0$, the closed fragment of the basic interpretability logic $\textbf{IL}$. We show that we can translate $\textbf{GL}_1$, the one variable fragment of Gödel-Löb's provabilty logic $\textbf{GL}$, into $\textbf{IL}_0$. Invoking a result on the PSPACE completeness of $\textbf{GL}_1$ we obtain the PSPACE hardness of $\textbf{IL}_0$. In this paper from 2011 we consider $\textbf{IL}_0$, the closed fragment of the basic interpretability logic $\textbf{IL}$. We show that we can translate $\textbf{GL}_1$, the one variable fragment of Gödel-Löb's provabilty logic $\textbf{GL}$, into $\textbf{IL}_0$. Invoking a result on the PSPACE completeness of $\textbf{GL}_1$ we obtain the PSPACE hardness of $\textbf{IL}_0$. △ Less

Submitted 14 April, 2020; originally announced April 2020.

Journal ref: Elsevier, Electronic Notes in Theoretical Computer Science, Volume 278 (47-54), 2011

Propositional proof systems and fast consistency provers

Authors: Joost J. Joosten

Abstract: A fast consistency prover is a consistent poly-time axiomatized theory that has short proofs of the finite consistency statements of any other poly-time axiomatized theory. Kraj\'ıček and Pudlák proved that the existence of an optimal propositional proof system is equivalent to the existence of a fast consistency prover. It is an easy observation that ${\sf NP}={\sf coNP}$ implies the existence of… ▽ More A fast consistency prover is a consistent poly-time axiomatized theory that has short proofs of the finite consistency statements of any other poly-time axiomatized theory. Kraj\'ıček and Pudlák proved that the existence of an optimal propositional proof system is equivalent to the existence of a fast consistency prover. It is an easy observation that ${\sf NP}={\sf coNP}$ implies the existence of a fast consistency prover. The reverse implication is an open question. In this paper we define the notion of an unlikely fast consistency prover and prove that its existence is equivalent to ${\sf NP}={\sf coNP}$. Next it is proved that fast consistency provers do not exist if one considers RE axiomatized theories rather than theories with an axiom set that is recognizable in polynomial time. △ Less

Submitted 11 April, 2020; originally announced April 2020.

Journal ref: Notre Dame Journal of Formal Logic, 48 (3), 381-398; 2007

Quantified Reflection Calculus with one modality

Authors: Ana de Almeida Borges, Joost J. Joosten

Abstract: This paper presents the logic QRC$_1$, which is a strictly positive fragment of quantified modal logic. The intended reading of the diamond modality is that of consistency of a formal theory. Predicate symbols are interpreted as parametrized axiomatizations. We prove arithmetical soundness of the logic QRC$_1$ with respect to this arithmetical interpretation. Quantified provability logic is know… ▽ More This paper presents the logic QRC$_1$, which is a strictly positive fragment of quantified modal logic. The intended reading of the diamond modality is that of consistency of a formal theory. Predicate symbols are interpreted as parametrized axiomatizations. We prove arithmetical soundness of the logic QRC$_1$ with respect to this arithmetical interpretation. Quantified provability logic is known to be undecidable. However, the undecidability proof cannot be performed in our signature and arithmetical reading. We conjecture the logic QRC$_1$ to be arithmetically complete. This paper takes the first steps towards arithmetical completeness by providing relational semantics for QRC$_1$ with a corresponding completeness proof. We also show the finite model property, which implies decidability. △ Less

Submitted 30 March, 2020; originally announced March 2020.

Comments: Submitted to Advances in Modal Logic 2020

Journal ref: Advances in Modal Logic 13 (2020) 13-32

Assuring and critical labels for relations between maximal consistent sets for interpretability logics

Authors: Evan Goris, Marta Bílková, Joost J. Joosten, Luka Mikec

Abstract: The notion of a critical successor [dJV90] has been central to almost all modal completeness proofs in interpretability logics. In this paper we shall work with an alternative notion, that of an assuring successor. As we shall see, this will enable more concisely formulated completeness proofs, both with respect to ordinary and generalised Veltman semantics. Due to their interesting theoretical pr… ▽ More The notion of a critical successor [dJV90] has been central to almost all modal completeness proofs in interpretability logics. In this paper we shall work with an alternative notion, that of an assuring successor. As we shall see, this will enable more concisely formulated completeness proofs, both with respect to ordinary and generalised Veltman semantics. Due to their interesting theoretical properties, we will devote some space to the study of a particular kind of assuring labels, the so-called full labels and maximal labels.. After a general treatment of assuringness, we shall apply it to obtain certain completeness results. Namely, we give another proof of completeness of ILW w.r.t. ordinary semantics and of ILP w.r.t. generalised semantics. △ Less

Submitted 27 February, 2022; v1 submitted 10 March, 2020; originally announced March 2020.

Comments: 38 pages, 8 figures

MSC Class: 03F45; 03B45

Münchhausen provability

Authors: Joost J. Joosten

Abstract: By Solovay's celebrated completeness result on formal provability we know that the provability logic $\mathrm GL$ describes exactly all provable structural properties for any sound and strong enough arithmetical theory with a decidable axiomatisation. Japaridze generalised this result by considering a polymodal version $\mathrm GLP$ of $\mathrm GL$ with modalities $[n]$ for each natural number… ▽ More By Solovay's celebrated completeness result on formal provability we know that the provability logic $\mathrm GL$ describes exactly all provable structural properties for any sound and strong enough arithmetical theory with a decidable axiomatisation. Japaridze generalised this result by considering a polymodal version $\mathrm GLP$ of $\mathrm GL$ with modalities $[n]$ for each natural number $n$ referring to ever increasing notions of provability. Modern treatments of $\mathrm GLP$ tend to interpret the $[n]$ provability notion as "provable in a base theory $T$ together with all true $Π^0_n$ formulas as oracles". In this paper we generalise this interpretation into the transfinite. In order to do so, a main difficulty to overcome is to generalise the syntactical characterisations of the oracle formulas of complexity $Π^0_n$ to the hyper-arithmetical hierarchy. The paper exploits the fact that provability is $Σ^0_1$ complete and that similar results hold for stronger provability notions. As such, the oracle sentences to define provability at level $α$ will recursively be taken to be consistency statements at lower levels: provability through provability whence the name of the paper. The paper proves soundness and completeness for the proposed interpretation for a wide class of theories; namely for any theory that can formalise the recursion described above and that has some further very natural properties. Some remarks are provided on how the recursion can be formalised into second order arithmetic and on lowering the proof-theoretical strength of these systems of second order arithmetic. △ Less

Submitted 29 August, 2019; originally announced August 2019.

The Reduction Property Revisited

Authors: Nika Pona, Joost J. Joosten

Abstract: In this paper we will study an important but rather technical result which is called The Reduction Property. The result tells us how much arithmetical conservation there is between two arithmetical theories. Both theories essentially speak about the fundamental principle of reflection: if a sentence is provable then it is true. The first theory is axiomatized using reflection axioms and the second… ▽ More In this paper we will study an important but rather technical result which is called The Reduction Property. The result tells us how much arithmetical conservation there is between two arithmetical theories. Both theories essentially speak about the fundamental principle of reflection: if a sentence is provable then it is true. The first theory is axiomatized using reflection axioms and the second theory uses reflection rules. The Reduction Property tells us that the first theory extends the second but in a conservative way for a large class of formulae. We extend the Reduction Property in various directions. Most notably, we shall see how various different kind of reflection axioms and rules can be related to each other. Further, we extend the Reduction Property to transfinite reflection principles. Since there is no satisfactory (hyper) arithmetical interpretation around yet, this generalization shall hence be performed in a purely algebraic setting. For the experts: a consequence of the classical Reduction Property characterizes the $Π^0_{n+1}$ consequences and tells us that for any theories $U$ and $T$ of the right complexity we have \[ U + {\sf Con}_{n+1}(T) \equiv_{Π^0_{n+1}} U \cup \{ {\sf Con}_n^k(T)\mid k<ω\}. \] We will compute which theories can be put at the right-hand side if we are interested in $Π^0_j$ formulas with $j{\leq}n$. We answer the question also in a purely algebraic setting where $Π^0_j$-conservation will be suitably defined. The algebraic turn allows for generalizations to transfinite consistency notions. △ Less

Submitted 8 March, 2019; originally announced March 2019.

When logic lays down the law

Authors: Bjørn Jespersen, Ana de Almeida Borges, Jorge del Castillo Tierz, Juan José Conejero Rodríguez, Eric Sancho Adamson, Aleix Solé Sánchez, Nika Pona, Joost J. Joosten

Abstract: We analyse so-called computable laws, i.e., laws that can be enforced by automatic procedures. These laws should be logically perfect and unambiguous, but sometimes they are not. We use a regulation on road transport to illustrate this issue, and show what some fragments of this regulation would look like if rewritten in the image of logic. We further propose desiderata to be fulfilled by computab… ▽ More We analyse so-called computable laws, i.e., laws that can be enforced by automatic procedures. These laws should be logically perfect and unambiguous, but sometimes they are not. We use a regulation on road transport to illustrate this issue, and show what some fragments of this regulation would look like if rewritten in the image of logic. We further propose desiderata to be fulfilled by computable laws, and provide a critical platform from which to assess existing laws and a guideline for composing future ones. △ Less

Submitted 6 October, 2018; originally announced October 2018.

Comments: 26 pages

MSC Class: 00A69

The Worm Calculus

Authors: Ana de Almeida Borges, Joost J. Joosten

Abstract: We present a propositional modal logic $\sf WC$, which includes a logical $verum$ constant $\top$ but does not have any propositional variables. Furthermore, the only connectives in the language of $\sf WC$ are consistency-operators $\langle α\rangle$ for each ordinal $α$. As such, we end up with a class-size logic. However, for all practical purposes, we can consider restrictions of $\sf WC$ up t… ▽ More We present a propositional modal logic $\sf WC$, which includes a logical $verum$ constant $\top$ but does not have any propositional variables. Furthermore, the only connectives in the language of $\sf WC$ are consistency-operators $\langle α\rangle$ for each ordinal $α$. As such, we end up with a class-size logic. However, for all practical purposes, we can consider restrictions of $\sf WC$ up to a given ordinal. Given the restrictive signature of the language, the only formulas are iterated consistency statements, which are called worms. The theorems of $\sf WC$ are all of the form $A \vdash B$ for worms $A$ and $B$. The main result of the paper says that the well-known strictly positive logic $\sf RC$, called Reflection Calculus, is a conservative extension of $\sf WC$. As such, our result is important since it is the ultimate step in stripping spurious complexity off the polymodal provability logic $\sf{GLP}$, as far as applications to ordinal analyses are concerned. Indeed, it may come as a surprise that a logic as weak as $\sf WC$ serves the purpose of computing something as technically involved as the proof theoretical ordinals of formal mathematical theories. △ Less

Submitted 18 June, 2019; v1 submitted 28 March, 2018; originally announced March 2018.

Journal ref: Advances in Modal Logic 12 (2018) 13-27

Relational Semantics for the Turing Schmerl Calculus

Authors: Eduardo Hermo Reyes, Joost J. Joosten

Abstract: In arXiv:1604.08705 the authors introduced the propositional modal logic $\textbf{TSC}$ (which stands for Turing Schmerl Calculus) which adequately describes the provable interrelations between different kinds of Turing progressions. The current paper defines a model $\mathcal{J}$ which is proven to be a universal model for $\textbf{TSC}$. The model $\mathcal{J}$ is a slight modification of the in… ▽ More In arXiv:1604.08705 the authors introduced the propositional modal logic $\textbf{TSC}$ (which stands for Turing Schmerl Calculus) which adequately describes the provable interrelations between different kinds of Turing progressions. The current paper defines a model $\mathcal{J}$ which is proven to be a universal model for $\textbf{TSC}$. The model $\mathcal{J}$ is a slight modification of the intensively studied $\mathcal{I}$ : Ignatiev's universal model for the closed fragment of Gödel Löb's polymodal provability logic $\textbf{GLP}$. △ Less

Submitted 27 April, 2018; v1 submitted 14 September, 2017; originally announced September 2017.

Labelled tableaux for interpretability logics

Authors: Tuomas A. Hakoniemi, Joost J. Joosten

Abstract: In is paper we present a labelled tableau proof system that serves a wide class of interpretability logics. The system is proved sound and complete for any interpretability logic characterised by a frame condition given by a set of universal strict first order Horn sentences. As such, the current paper adds to a better proof-theoretical understanding of interpretability logics. In is paper we present a labelled tableau proof system that serves a wide class of interpretability logics. The system is proved sound and complete for any interpretability logic characterised by a frame condition given by a set of universal strict first order Horn sentences. As such, the current paper adds to a better proof-theoretical understanding of interpretability logics. △ Less

Submitted 18 May, 2016; originally announced May 2016.

Comments: Dedicated to Albert Visser on the occasion of his retirement. In: Liber Amicorum Alberti, A Tribute to Albert Visser, Eds. Jan van Eijck, Rosalie Iemhoff and Joost J. Joosten, p. 141-154, Tributes Series Vol. 30, College Publications, London. ISBN 978-1-84890-204-6, 2016

The logic of Turing progressions

Authors: Eduardo Hermo Reyes, Joost J. Joosten

Abstract: Turing progressions arise by iteratedly adding consistency statements to a base theory. Different notions of consistency give rise to different Turing progressions. In this paper we present a logic that generates exactly all relations that hold between these different Turing progressions given a particular set of natural consistency notions. Thus, the presented logic is proven to arithmetically so… ▽ More Turing progressions arise by iteratedly adding consistency statements to a base theory. Different notions of consistency give rise to different Turing progressions. In this paper we present a logic that generates exactly all relations that hold between these different Turing progressions given a particular set of natural consistency notions. Thus, the presented logic is proven to arithmetically sound and complete for a natural interpretation, named the \emph{Formalized Turing progressions} (FTP) interpretation. △ Less

Submitted 13 September, 2017; v1 submitted 29 April, 2016; originally announced April 2016.

Journal ref: Notre Dame J. Formal Logic 61, no. 1 (2020), 155-180

Characterizations of interpretability in bounded arithmetic

Authors: Joost J. Joosten

Abstract: This paper deals with three tools to compare proof-theoretic strength of formal arithmetical theories: interpretability, $Π^0_1$-conservativity and proving restricted consistency. It is well known that under certain conditions these three notions are equivalent and this equivalence is often referred to as the Orey-Hájek characterization of interpretability. In this paper we look with detail at t… ▽ More This paper deals with three tools to compare proof-theoretic strength of formal arithmetical theories: interpretability, $Π^0_1$-conservativity and proving restricted consistency. It is well known that under certain conditions these three notions are equivalent and this equivalence is often referred to as the Orey-Hájek characterization of interpretability. In this paper we look with detail at the Orey-Hájek characterization and study what conditions are needed and in what meta-theory the characterizations can be formalized. △ Less

Submitted 1 February, 2016; originally announced February 2016.

Two series of formalized interpretability principles for weak systems of arithmetic

Authors: Evan Goris, Joost J. Joosten

Abstract: The provability logic of a theory $T$ captures the structural behavior of formalized provability in $T$ as provable in $T$ itself. Like provability, one can formalize the notion of relative interpretability giving rise to interpretability logics. Where provability logics are the same for all moderately sound theories of some minimal strength, interpretability logics do show variations. The logic… ▽ More The provability logic of a theory $T$ captures the structural behavior of formalized provability in $T$ as provable in $T$ itself. Like provability, one can formalize the notion of relative interpretability giving rise to interpretability logics. Where provability logics are the same for all moderately sound theories of some minimal strength, interpretability logics do show variations. The logic IL(All) is defined as the collection of modal principles that are provable in any moderately sound theory of some minimal strength. In this paper we raise the previously known lower bound of IL(All) by exhibiting two series of principles which are shown to be provable in any such theory. Moreover, we compute the collection of frame conditions for both series. △ Less

Submitted 31 March, 2015; originally announced March 2015.

Turing jumps through provability

Authors: Joost J. Joosten

Abstract: Fixing some computably enumerable theory $T$, the Friedman-Goldfarb-Harrington (FGH) theorem says that over elementary arithmetic, each $Σ_1$ formula is equivalent to some formula of the form $\Box_T \varphi$ provided that $T$ is consistent. In this paper we give various generalizations of the FGH theorem. In particular, for $n>1$ we relate $Σ_{n}$ formulas to provability statements… ▽ More Fixing some computably enumerable theory $T$, the Friedman-Goldfarb-Harrington (FGH) theorem says that over elementary arithmetic, each $Σ_1$ formula is equivalent to some formula of the form $\Box_T \varphi$ provided that $T$ is consistent. In this paper we give various generalizations of the FGH theorem. In particular, for $n>1$ we relate $Σ_{n}$ formulas to provability statements $[n]_T^{\sf True}\varphi$ which are a formalization of "provable in $T$ together with all true $Σ_{n+1}$ sentences". As a corollary we conclude that each $[n]_T^{\sf True}$ is $Σ_{n+1}$-complete. This observation yields us to consider a recursively defined hierarchy of provability predicates $[n+1]^\Box_T$ which look a lot like $[n+1]_T^{\sf True}$ except that where $[n+1]_T^{\sf True}$ calls upon the oracle of all true $Σ_{n+2}$ sentences, the $[n+1]^\Box_T$ recursively calls upon the oracle of all true sentences of the form $\langle n \rangle_T^\Boxφ$. As such we obtain a `syntax-light' characterization of $Σ_{n+1}$ definability whence of Turing jumps which is readily extended beyond the finite. Moreover, we observe that the corresponding provability predicates $[n+1]_T^\Box$ are well behaved in that together they provide a sound interpretation of the polymodal provability logic ${\sf GLP}_ω$. △ Less

Submitted 21 January, 2015; originally announced January 2015.

Predicativity through transfinite reflection

Authors: Andrés Cordon Franco, David Fernández Duque, Joost J. Joosten, Félix Lara Martín

Abstract: Peano Arithmetic is known to be provably equivalent to reflection over Elementary Arithmetic. We prove a characterization of Predicative Analysis in the guise of ATR0 in terms of stronger reflection principles. Peano Arithmetic is known to be provably equivalent to reflection over Elementary Arithmetic. We prove a characterization of Predicative Analysis in the guise of ATR0 in terms of stronger reflection principles. △ Less

Submitted 13 January, 2015; v1 submitted 17 December, 2014; originally announced December 2014.

The Selfish Algorithm

Authors: Eduardo Hermo Reyes, Joost J. Joosten

Abstract: The principle of Generalized Natural Selection (GNS) states that in nature, computational processes of high computational sophistication are more likely to maintain/abide than processes of lower computational sophistication provided that sufficiently many resources are around to sustain the processes. In this paper we give a concrete set-up how to test GNS in a weak sense. In particular, we work i… ▽ More The principle of Generalized Natural Selection (GNS) states that in nature, computational processes of high computational sophistication are more likely to maintain/abide than processes of lower computational sophistication provided that sufficiently many resources are around to sustain the processes. In this paper we give a concrete set-up how to test GNS in a weak sense. In particular, we work in the setting of Cellular Automata and see how GNS can manifest itself in this setting. △ Less

Submitted 10 November, 2014; originally announced November 2014.

Turing-Taylor expansions for arithmetic theories

Authors: Joost J. Joosten

Abstract: Turing progressions have been often used to measure the proof-theoretic strength of mathematical theories. Turing progressions based on $n$-provability give rise to a $Π_{n+1}$ proof-theoretic ordinal. As such, to each theory $U$ we can assign the sequence of corresponding $Π_{n+1}$ ordinals $\langle |U|_n\rangle_{n>0}$. We call this sequence a \emph{Turing-Taylor expansion} of a theory. In this… ▽ More Turing progressions have been often used to measure the proof-theoretic strength of mathematical theories. Turing progressions based on $n$-provability give rise to a $Π_{n+1}$ proof-theoretic ordinal. As such, to each theory $U$ we can assign the sequence of corresponding $Π_{n+1}$ ordinals $\langle |U|_n\rangle_{n>0}$. We call this sequence a \emph{Turing-Taylor expansion} of a theory. In this paper, we relate Turing-Taylor expansions of sub-theories of Peano Arithmetic to Ignatiev's universal model for the closed fragment of the polymodal provability logic ${\mathbf{GLP}}_ω$. In particular, in this first draft we observe that each point in the Ignatiev model can be seen as Turing-Taylor expansions of formal mathematical theories. Moreover, each sub-theory of Peano Arithmetic that allows for a Turing-Taylor expression will define a unique point in Ignatiev's model. △ Less

Submitted 3 August, 2015; v1 submitted 17 April, 2014; originally announced April 2014.

Comments: First draft

Fractal dimension versus process complexity

Authors: Joost J. Joosten, Fernando Soler-Toscano, Hector Zenil

Abstract: Complexity measures are designed to capture complex behavior and quantify *how* complex, according to that measure, that particular behavior is. It can be expected that different complexity measures from possibly entirely different fields are related to each other in a non-trivial fashion. Here we study small Turing machines (TMs) with two symbols, and two and three states. For any particular such… ▽ More Complexity measures are designed to capture complex behavior and quantify *how* complex, according to that measure, that particular behavior is. It can be expected that different complexity measures from possibly entirely different fields are related to each other in a non-trivial fashion. Here we study small Turing machines (TMs) with two symbols, and two and three states. For any particular such machine $τ$ and any particular input $x$ we consider what we call the 'space-time' diagram which is the collection of consecutive tape configurations of the computation $τ(x)$. In our setting, we define fractal dimension of a Turing machine as the limiting fractal dimension of the corresponding space-time diagram. It turns out that there is a very strong relation between the fractal dimension of a Turing machine of the above-specified type and its runtime complexity. In particular, a TM with three states and two colors runs in at most linear time iff its dimension is 2, and its dimension is 1 iff it runs in super-polynomial time and it uses polynomial space. If a TM runs in time $O(x^n)$ we have empirically verified that the corresponding dimension is $(n+1)/n$, a result that we can only partially prove. We find the results presented here remarkable because they relate two completely different complexity measures: the geometrical fractal dimension on the one side versus the time complexity of a computation on the other side. △ Less

Submitted 22 August, 2016; v1 submitted 6 September, 2013; originally announced September 2013.

Comments: Accepted in the journal Advances of Mathematical Physics

The omega-rule interpretation of transfinite provability logic

Authors: David Fernández-Duque, Joost J. Joosten

Abstract: In this paper we consider transfinite provability logics where for each ordinal in some recursive well-order we have a corresponding modal provability operator. The modality [xi] will be interpreted as "provable in ACA_0 together with at most xi nested applications of the omega rule". We show how to formalize this in in second order number theory. Next we prove both soundness and completeness unde… ▽ More In this paper we consider transfinite provability logics where for each ordinal in some recursive well-order we have a corresponding modal provability operator. The modality [xi] will be interpreted as "provable in ACA_0 together with at most xi nested applications of the omega rule". We show how to formalize this in in second order number theory. Next we prove both soundness and completeness under this interpretation. We conclude by showing how one can lower the base theory ACA_0 to theories below RCA_0. △ Less

Submitted 21 February, 2013; originally announced February 2013.

MSC Class: 03F45; 03F15

Well-orders in the transfinite Japaridze algebra

Authors: David Fernández-Duque, Joost J. Joosten

Abstract: This paper studies the transfinite propositional provability logics $\glp_Λ$ and their corresponding algebras. These logics have for each ordinal $ξ< Λ$ a modality $\la α\ra$. We will focus on the closed fragment of $\glp_Λ$ (i.e., where no propositional variables occur) and \emph{worms} therein. Worms are iterated consistency expressions of the form $\la ξ_n\ra \ldots \la ξ_1 \ra \top$. Beklemish… ▽ More This paper studies the transfinite propositional provability logics $\glp_Λ$ and their corresponding algebras. These logics have for each ordinal $ξ< Λ$ a modality $\la α\ra$. We will focus on the closed fragment of $\glp_Λ$ (i.e., where no propositional variables occur) and \emph{worms} therein. Worms are iterated consistency expressions of the form $\la ξ_n\ra \ldots \la ξ_1 \ra \top$. Beklemishev has defined well-orderings $<_ξ$ on worms whose modalities are all at least $ξ$ and presented a calculus to compute the respective order-types. In the current paper we present a generalization of the original $<_ξ$ orderings and provide a calculus for the corresponding generalized order-types $o_ξ$. Our calculus is based on so-called {\em hyperations} which are transfinite iterations of normal functions. Finally, we give two different characterizations of those sequences of ordinals which are of the form $\la {\formerOmega}_ξ(A) \ra_{ξ\in \ord}$ for some worm $A$. One of these characterizations is in terms of a second kind of transfinite iteration called {\em cohyperation.} △ Less

Submitted 17 January, 2014; v1 submitted 14 December, 2012; originally announced December 2012.

Comments: Corrected a minor but confusing omission in the relation between Veblen progressions and hyperations

Complexity fits the fittest

Authors: J. J. Joosten

Abstract: In this paper we shall relate computational complexity to the principle of natural selection. We shall do this by giving a philosophical account of complexity versus universality. It seems sustainable to equate universal systems to complex systems or at least to potentially complex systems. Post's problem on the existence of (natural) intermediate degrees (between decidable and universal RE) then… ▽ More In this paper we shall relate computational complexity to the principle of natural selection. We shall do this by giving a philosophical account of complexity versus universality. It seems sustainable to equate universal systems to complex systems or at least to potentially complex systems. Post's problem on the existence of (natural) intermediate degrees (between decidable and universal RE) then finds its analog in the Principle of Computional Equivalence (PCE). In this paper we address possible driving forces --if any-- behind PCE. Both the natural aspects as well as the cognitive ones are investigated. We postulate a principle GNS that we call the Generalized Natural Selection principle that together with the Church-Turing thesis is seen to be in close correspondence to a weak version of PCE. Next, we view our cognitive toolkit in an evolutionary light and postulate a principle in analogy with Fodor's language principle. In the final part of the paper we reflect on ways to provide circumstantial evidence for GNS by means of theorems, experiments or, simulations. △ Less

Submitted 11 December, 2012; originally announced December 2012.

Comments: arXiv admin note: substantial text overlap with arXiv:1211.1878

Pi^0_1 ordinal analysis beyond first order arithmetic

Authors: J. J. Joosten

Abstract: In this paper we give an overview of an essential part of a Pi^0_1 ordinal analysis of Peano Arithmetic (PA) as presented by Beklemishev. This analysis is mainly performed within the polymodal provability logic GLP. We reflect on ways of extending this analysis beyond PA. A main difficulty in this is to find proper generalizations of the so-called Reduction Property. The Reduction Property relat… ▽ More In this paper we give an overview of an essential part of a Pi^0_1 ordinal analysis of Peano Arithmetic (PA) as presented by Beklemishev. This analysis is mainly performed within the polymodal provability logic GLP. We reflect on ways of extending this analysis beyond PA. A main difficulty in this is to find proper generalizations of the so-called Reduction Property. The Reduction Property relates reflection principles to reflection rules. In this paper we prove a result that simplifies the reflection rules. Moreover, we see that for an ordinal analysis the full Reduction Property is not needed. This latter observation is also seen to open up ways for applications of ordinal analysis relative to some strong base theory. △ Less

Submitted 11 December, 2012; originally announced December 2012.

On the necessity of complexity

Authors: Joost J. Joosten

Abstract: Wolfram's Principle of Computational Equivalence (PCE) implies that universal complexity abounds in nature. This paper comprises three sections. In the first section we consider the question why there are so many universal phenomena around. So, in a sense, we week a driving force behind the PCE if any. We postulate a principle GNS that we call the Generalized Natural Selection Principle that toget… ▽ More Wolfram's Principle of Computational Equivalence (PCE) implies that universal complexity abounds in nature. This paper comprises three sections. In the first section we consider the question why there are so many universal phenomena around. So, in a sense, we week a driving force behind the PCE if any. We postulate a principle GNS that we call the Generalized Natural Selection Principle that together with the Church-Turing Thesis is seen to be equivalent to a weak version of PCE. In the second section we ask the question why we do not observe any phenomena that are complex but not-universal. We choose a cognitive setting to embark on this question and make some analogies with formal logic. In the third and final section we report on a case study where we see rich structures arise everywhere. △ Less

Submitted 6 November, 2012; originally announced November 2012.

Comments: 17 pages, 3 figures

MSC Class: 68Q80; 68Q01; 68Q05; 8Q10

On provability logics with linearly ordered modalities

Authors: Lev D. Beklemishev, David Fernández-Duque, Joost J. Joosten

Abstract: We introduce the logics GLP(Λ), a generalization of Japaridze's polymodal provability logic GLP(ω) where Λis any linearly ordered set representing a hierarchy of provability operators of increasing strength. We shall provide a reduction of these logics to GLP(ω) yielding among other things a finitary proof of the normal form theorem for the variable-free fragment of GLP(Λ) and the decidability o… ▽ More We introduce the logics GLP(Λ), a generalization of Japaridze's polymodal provability logic GLP(ω) where Λis any linearly ordered set representing a hierarchy of provability operators of increasing strength. We shall provide a reduction of these logics to GLP(ω) yielding among other things a finitary proof of the normal form theorem for the variable-free fragment of GLP(Λ) and the decidability of GLP(Λ) for recursive orderings Λ. Further, we give a restricted axiomatization of the variable-free fragment of GLP(Λ). △ Less

Submitted 17 October, 2012; originally announced October 2012.

Hyperations, Veblen progressions and transfinite iterations of ordinal functions

Authors: David Fernández-Duque, Joost J. Joosten

Abstract: In this paper we introduce hyperations and cohyperations, which are forms of transfinite iteration of ordinal functions. Hyperations are iterations of normal functions. Unlike iteration by pointwise convergence, hyperation preserves normality. The hyperation of a normal function f is a sequence of normal functions so that f^0= id, f^1 = f and for all ordinals α, βwe have that f^(α+ β) = f^αf^β.… ▽ More In this paper we introduce hyperations and cohyperations, which are forms of transfinite iteration of ordinal functions. Hyperations are iterations of normal functions. Unlike iteration by pointwise convergence, hyperation preserves normality. The hyperation of a normal function f is a sequence of normal functions so that f^0= id, f^1 = f and for all ordinals α, βwe have that f^(α+ β) = f^αf^β. These conditions do not determine f^αuniquely; in addition, we require that the functions be minimal in an appropriate sense. We study hyperations systematically and show that they are a natural refinement of Veblen progressions. Next, we define cohyperations, very similar to hyperations except that they are left-additive: given α, β, f^(α+ β)= f^βf^α. Cohyperations iterate initial functions which are functions that map initial segments to initial segments. We systematically study cohyperations and see how they can be employed to define left inverses to hyperations. Hyperations provide an alternative presentation of Veblen progressions and can be useful where a more fine-grained analysis of such sequences is called for. They are very amenable to algebraic manipulation and hence are convenient to work with. Cohyperations, meanwhile, give a novel way to describe slowly increasing functions as often appear, for example, in proof theory. △ Less

Submitted 9 May, 2012; originally announced May 2012.

Models of transfinite provability logic

Authors: David Fernández-Duque, Joost J. Joosten

Abstract: For any ordinal Λ, we can define a polymodal logic GLP(Λ), with a modality [ξ] for each ξ<Λ. These represent provability predicates of increasing strength. Although GLP(Λ) has no Kripke models, Ignatiev showed that indeed one can construct a Kripke model of the variable-free fragment with natural number modalities. Later, Icard defined a topological model for the same fragment which is very closel… ▽ More For any ordinal Λ, we can define a polymodal logic GLP(Λ), with a modality [ξ] for each ξ<Λ. These represent provability predicates of increasing strength. Although GLP(Λ) has no Kripke models, Ignatiev showed that indeed one can construct a Kripke model of the variable-free fragment with natural number modalities. Later, Icard defined a topological model for the same fragment which is very closely related to Ignatiev's. In this paper we show how to extend these constructions for arbitrary Λ. More generally, for each Θ,Λwe build a Kripke model I(Θ,Λ) and a topological model T(Θ,Λ), and show that the closed fragment of GLP(Λ) is sound for both of these structures, as well as complete, provided Θis large enough. △ Less

Submitted 21 April, 2012; originally announced April 2012.

Well-orders in the transfinite Japaridze algebra II: Turing progressions and their well-orders

Authors: David Fernández-Duque, Joost J. Joosten

Abstract: We study transfinite extensions of Japaridze's provability logic GLP and the well-founded relations that naturally occur within them. Every ordinal induces a partial order over the class of "words," which are iterated consistency statements expressible within GLP. Well-ordered restrictions of these partial orders have been studied previously; in this paper we consider the unrestricted partial orde… ▽ More We study transfinite extensions of Japaridze's provability logic GLP and the well-founded relations that naturally occur within them. Every ordinal induces a partial order over the class of "words," which are iterated consistency statements expressible within GLP. Well-ordered restrictions of these partial orders have been studied previously; in this paper we consider the unrestricted partial orders, which are no longer linear but remain well-founded. These unrestricted partial orders bear important repercussions on modal semantics for GLP and on Turing progressions. △ Less

Submitted 20 December, 2013; v1 submitted 20 April, 2012; originally announced April 2012.

Comments: Extension of previous version by Section 10, some new proofs and theorems

A secure additive protocol for card players

Authors: Andres Cordon-Franco, Hans van Ditmarsch, David Fernandez-Duque, Joost J. Joosten, Fernando Soler-Toscano

Abstract: Consider three players Alice, Bob and Cath who hold a, b and c cards, respectively, from a deck of d=a+b+c cards. The cards are all different and players only know their own cards. Suppose Alice and Bob wish to communicate their cards to each other without Cath learning whether Alice or Bob holds a specific card. Considering the cards as consecutive natural numbers 0,1,..., we investigate genera… ▽ More Consider three players Alice, Bob and Cath who hold a, b and c cards, respectively, from a deck of d=a+b+c cards. The cards are all different and players only know their own cards. Suppose Alice and Bob wish to communicate their cards to each other without Cath learning whether Alice or Bob holds a specific card. Considering the cards as consecutive natural numbers 0,1,..., we investigate general conditions for when Alice or Bob can safely announce the sum of the cards they hold modulo an appropriately chosen integer. We demonstrate that this holds whenever a,b>2 and c=1. Because Cath holds a single card, this also implies that Alice and Bob will learn the card deal from the other player's announcement. △ Less

Submitted 1 November, 2011; originally announced November 2011.

Journal ref: Australasian Journal of Combinatorics 54: 163-175, 2012

Empirical Encounters with Computational Irreducibility and Unpredictability

Authors: Hector Zenil, Fernando Soler-Toscano, Joost J. Joosten

Abstract: There are several forms of irreducibility in computing systems, ranging from undecidability to intractability to nonlinearity. This paper is an exploration of the conceptual issues that have arisen in the course of investigating speed-up and slowdown phenomena in small Turing machines. We present the results of a test that may spur experimental approaches to the notion of computational irreducibil… ▽ More There are several forms of irreducibility in computing systems, ranging from undecidability to intractability to nonlinearity. This paper is an exploration of the conceptual issues that have arisen in the course of investigating speed-up and slowdown phenomena in small Turing machines. We present the results of a test that may spur experimental approaches to the notion of computational irreducibility. The test involves a systematic attempt to outrun the computation of a large number of small Turing machines (all 3 and 4 state, 2 symbol) by means of integer sequence prediction using a specialized function finder program. This massive experiment prompts an investigation into rates of convergence of decision procedures and the decidability of sets in addition to a discussion of the (un)predictability of deterministic computing systems in practice. We think this investigation constitutes a novel approach to the discussion of an epistemological question in the context of a computer simulation, and thus represents an interesting exploration at the boundary between philosophical concerns and computational experiments. △ Less

Submitted 23 June, 2011; v1 submitted 18 April, 2011; originally announced April 2011.

Comments: 18 pages, 4 figures

Program-Size Versus Time Complexity, Speed-Up and Slowdown Phenomena in Small Turing Machines

Authors: Joost J. Joosten, Fernando Soler-Toscano, Hector Zenil

Abstract: The aim of this paper is to undertake an experimental investigation of the trade-offs between program-size and time computational complexity. The investigation includes an exhaustive exploration and systematic study of the functions computed by the set of all 2-color Turing machines with 2, 3 and 4 states--denoted by (n,2) with n the number of states--with particular attention to the runtimes and… ▽ More The aim of this paper is to undertake an experimental investigation of the trade-offs between program-size and time computational complexity. The investigation includes an exhaustive exploration and systematic study of the functions computed by the set of all 2-color Turing machines with 2, 3 and 4 states--denoted by (n,2) with n the number of states--with particular attention to the runtimes and space usages when the machines have access to larger resources (more states). We report that the average runtime of Turing machines computing a function almost surely increases as a function of the number of states, indicating that machines not terminating (almost) immediately tend to occupy all the resources at hand. We calculated all time complexity classes to which the algorithms computing the functions found in both (2,2) and (3,2) belong to, and made a comparison among these classes. For a selection of functions the comparison was extended to (4,2). Our study revealed various structures in the micro-cosmos of small Turing machines. Most notably we observed "phase-transitions" in the halting-probability distribution that we explain. Moreover, it is observed that short initial segments fully define a function computed by a Turing machine. △ Less

Submitted 16 April, 2011; v1 submitted 26 February, 2011; originally announced February 2011.

Comments: Proceedings of the 3rd. International workshop on Physics and Computation 2010 on the Nile, Egypt, pages 175-198, 2010. Forthcoming in the International Journal of Unconventional Computing (IJUC)

Complejidad descriptiva y computacional en maquinas de Turing pequenas

Authors: Joost J. Joosten, Fernando Soler-Toscano, Hector Zenil

Abstract: We start by an introduction to the basic concepts of computability theory and the introduction of the concept of Turing machine and computation universality. Then se turn to the exploration of trade-offs between different measures of complexity, particularly algorithmic (program-size) and computational (time) complexity as a mean to explain these measure in a novel manner. The investigation procee… ▽ More We start by an introduction to the basic concepts of computability theory and the introduction of the concept of Turing machine and computation universality. Then se turn to the exploration of trade-offs between different measures of complexity, particularly algorithmic (program-size) and computational (time) complexity as a mean to explain these measure in a novel manner. The investigation proceeds by an exhaustive exploration and systematic study of the functions computed by a large set of small Turing machines with 2 and 3 states with particular attention to runtimes, space-usages and patterns corresponding to the computed functions when the machines have access to larger resources (more states). We report that the average runtime of Turing machines computing a function increases as a function of the number of states, indicating that non-trivial machines tend to occupy all the resources at hand. General slow-down was witnessed and some incidental cases of (linear) speed-up were found. Throughout our study various interesting structures were encountered. We unveil a study of structures in the micro-cosmos of small Turing machines. △ Less

Submitted 15 April, 2011; v1 submitted 7 October, 2010; originally announced October 2010.

Comments: Artículo en español. Actas de las V Jornadas Ibéricas, Lógica Universal e Unidade da Ciencia, CFCUL, 2010. 20 pages, 22 figures, 3 tables; Keywords: small Turing machines, Program-size complexity, Kolmogorov-Chaitin complexity, space-time complexity, computational complexity, algorithmic complexity, geometric complexity

ACM Class: D.2.8