-
Survey-Based Calibration of the One-Community and Two-Community Social Network Models Used for Testing Singapore's Resilience to Pandemic Lockdown
Authors:
Jon Spalding,
Bertrand Jayles,
Renate Schubert,
Siew Ann Cheong,
Hans Herrmann
Abstract:
A resilient society is one capable of withstanding and thereafter recovering quickly from large shocks. Brought to the fore by the COVID-19 pandemic of 2020--2022, this social resilience is nevertheless difficult to quantify. In this paper, we measured how quickly the Singapore society recovered from the pandemic, by first modeling it as a dynamic social network governed by three processes: (1) ra…
▽ More
A resilient society is one capable of withstanding and thereafter recovering quickly from large shocks. Brought to the fore by the COVID-19 pandemic of 2020--2022, this social resilience is nevertheless difficult to quantify. In this paper, we measured how quickly the Singapore society recovered from the pandemic, by first modeling it as a dynamic social network governed by three processes: (1) random link addition between strangers; (2) social link addition between individuals with a friend in common; and (3) random link deletion . To calibrate this model, we carried out a survey of a representative sample of $N = 2,057$ residents and non-residents in Singapore between Jul and Sep 2022 to measure the numbers of random and social contacts gained over a fixed duration, as well as the number of contacts lost over the same duration, using phone contacts as proxy for social contacts. Lockdown simulations using the model that fits the survey results best suggest that Singapore would recover from such a disruption after 1--2 months.
△ Less
Submitted 26 March, 2025;
originally announced March 2025.
-
Crowd control: Reducing individual estimation bias by sharing biased social information
Authors:
Bertrand Jayles,
Clément Sire,
Ralf H. J. M Kurvers
Abstract:
Cognitive biases are widespread in humans and animals alike, and can sometimes be reinforced by social interactions. One prime bias in judgment and decision-making is the human tendency to underestimate large quantities. Previous research on social influence in estimation tasks has generally focused on the impact of single estimates on individual and collective accuracy, showing that randomly shar…
▽ More
Cognitive biases are widespread in humans and animals alike, and can sometimes be reinforced by social interactions. One prime bias in judgment and decision-making is the human tendency to underestimate large quantities. Previous research on social influence in estimation tasks has generally focused on the impact of single estimates on individual and collective accuracy, showing that randomly sharing estimates does not reduce the underestimation bias. Here, we test a method of social information sharing that exploits the known relationship between the true value and the level of underestimation, and study if it can counteract the underestimation bias. We performed estimation experiments in which participants had to estimate a series of quantities twice, before and after receiving estimates from one or several group members. Our purpose was threefold: to study (i) whether restructuring the sharing of social information can reduce the underestimation bias, (ii) how the number of estimates received affects the sensitivity to social influence and estimation accuracy, and (iii) the mechanisms underlying the integration of multiple estimates. Our restructuring of social interactions successfully countered the underestimation bias. Moreover, we find that sharing more than one estimate also reduces the underestimation bias. Underlying our results are a human tendency to herd, to trust larger estimates than one's own more than smaller estimates, and to follow disparate social information less. Using a computational modelling approach, we demonstrate that these effects are indeed key to explain the experimental results. Overall, our results show that existing knowledge on biases can be used to dampen their negative effects and boost judgment accuracy, paving the way for combating other cognitive biases threatening collective systems.
△ Less
Submitted 11 January, 2022; v1 submitted 15 March, 2020;
originally announced March 2020.
-
Impact of sharing full versus averaged social information on social influence and estimation accuracy
Authors:
Bertrand Jayles,
Clément Sire,
Ralf H. J. M Kurvers
Abstract:
The recent developments of social networks and recommender systems have dramatically increased the amount of social information shared in human communities, challenging the human ability to process it. As a result, sharing aggregated forms of social information is becoming increasingly popular. However, it is unknown whether sharing aggregated information improves people's judgments more than shar…
▽ More
The recent developments of social networks and recommender systems have dramatically increased the amount of social information shared in human communities, challenging the human ability to process it. As a result, sharing aggregated forms of social information is becoming increasingly popular. However, it is unknown whether sharing aggregated information improves people's judgments more than sharing the full available information. Here, we compare the performance of groups in estimation tasks when social information is fully shared versus when it is first averaged and then shared. We find that improvements in estimation accuracy are comparable in both cases. However, our results reveal important differences in subjects' behaviour: (i) subjects follow the social information more when receiving an average than when receiving all estimates, and this effect increases with the number of estimates underlying the average; (ii) subjects follow the social information more when it is higher than their personal estimate than when it is lower. This effect is stronger when receiving all estimates than when receiving an average. We introduce a model that sheds light on these effects, and confirms their importance for explaining improvements in estimation accuracy in all treatments.
△ Less
Submitted 11 January, 2022; v1 submitted 15 March, 2020;
originally announced March 2020.
-
The impact of incorrect social information on collective wisdom in human groups
Authors:
Bertrand Jayles,
Ramón Escobedo,
Stéphane Cezera,
Adrien Blanchet,
Tatsuya Kameda,
Clément Sire,
Guy Theraulaz
Abstract:
A major problem that resulted from the massive use of social media networks is the diffusion of incorrect information. However, very few studies have investigated the impact of incorrect information on individual and collective decisions. We performed experiments in which participants had to estimate a series of quantities before and after receiving social information. Unbeknownst to them, we cont…
▽ More
A major problem that resulted from the massive use of social media networks is the diffusion of incorrect information. However, very few studies have investigated the impact of incorrect information on individual and collective decisions. We performed experiments in which participants had to estimate a series of quantities before and after receiving social information. Unbeknownst to them, we controlled the degree of inaccuracy of the social information through "virtual influencers", who provided some incorrect information. We find that a large proportion of individuals only partially follow the social information, thus resisting incorrect information. Moreover, we find that incorrect social information can help a group perform better when it overestimates the true value, by partly compensating a human underestimation bias. Overall, our results suggest that incorrect information does not necessarily impair the collective wisdom of groups, and can even be used to dampen the negative effects of known cognitive biases.
△ Less
Submitted 13 March, 2020;
originally announced March 2020.
-
Collective Information Processing in Human Phase Separation
Authors:
Bertrand Jayles,
Ramón Escobedo,
Roberto Pasqua,
Christophe Zanon,
Adrien Blanchet,
Matthieu Roy,
Gilles Tredan,
Guy Theraulaz,
Clément Sire
Abstract:
Social media filters combined with recommender systems can lead to the emergence of filter bubbles and polarized groups. In addition, segregation processes of human groups in certain social contexts have been shown to share some similarities with phase separation phenomena in physics. Here, we study the impact of information filtering on collective segregation behavior. We report a series of exper…
▽ More
Social media filters combined with recommender systems can lead to the emergence of filter bubbles and polarized groups. In addition, segregation processes of human groups in certain social contexts have been shown to share some similarities with phase separation phenomena in physics. Here, we study the impact of information filtering on collective segregation behavior. We report a series of experiments where groups of 22 subjects have to perform a collective segregation task that mimics the tendency of individuals to bond with other similar individuals. More precisely, the participants are each assigned a color (red or blue) unknown to them, and have to regroup with other subjects sharing the same color. To assist them, they are equipped with an artificial sensory device capable of detecting the majority color in their ``environment'' (defined as their $k$ nearest neighbors, unbeknownst to them), for which we control the perception range, $k=1,3,5,7,9,11,13$. We study the separation dynamics (emergence of unicolor groups) and the properties of the final state, and show that the value of $k$ controls the quality of the segregation, although the subjects are totally unaware of the precise definition of the ``environment''. We also find that there is a perception range $k=7$ above which the ability of the group to segregate does not improve. We introduce a model that precisely describes the random motion of a group of pedestrians in a confined space, and which faithfully reproduces and allows to interpret the results of the segregation experiments. Finally, we discuss the strong and precise analogy between our experiment and the phase separation of two immiscible materials at very low temperature.
△ Less
Submitted 27 November, 2019;
originally announced November 2019.
-
How social information can improve estimation accuracy in human groups
Authors:
Bertrand Jayles,
Hye-rin Kim,
Ramón Escobedo,
Stéphane Cezera,
Adrien Blanchet,
Tatsuya Kameda,
Clément Sire,
Guy Theraulaz
Abstract:
In our digital and connected societies, the development of social networks, online shopping, and reputation systems raises the question of how individuals use social information, and how it affects their decisions. We report experiments performed in France and Japan, in which subjects could update their estimates after having received information from other subjects. We measure and model the impac…
▽ More
In our digital and connected societies, the development of social networks, online shopping, and reputation systems raises the question of how individuals use social information, and how it affects their decisions. We report experiments performed in France and Japan, in which subjects could update their estimates after having received information from other subjects. We measure and model the impact of this social information at individual and collective scales. We observe and justify that when individuals have little prior knowledge about a quantity, the distribution of the logarithm of their estimates is close to a Cauchy distribution. We find that social influence helps the group improve its properly defined collective accuracy. We quantify the improvement of the group estimation when additional controlled and reliable information is provided, unbeknownst to the subjects. We show that subjects' sensitivity to social influence permits to define five robust behavioral traits and increases with the difference between personal and group estimates. We then use our data to build and calibrate a model of collective estimation, to analyze the impact on the group performance of the quantity and quality of information received by individuals. The model quantitatively reproduces the distributions of estimates and the improvement of collective performance and accuracy observed in our experiments. Finally, our model predicts that providing a moderate amount of incorrect information to individuals can counterbalance the human cognitive bias to systematically underestimate quantities, and thereby improve collective performance.
△ Less
Submitted 7 November, 2017;
originally announced November 2017.
