-
Multioutput Gaussian Processes with Functional Data: A Study on Coastal Flood Hazard Assessment
Authors:
A. F. López-Lopera,
D. Idier,
J. Rohmer,
F. Bachoc
Abstract:
Surrogate models are often used to replace costly-to-evaluate complex coastal codes to achieve substantial computational savings. In many of those models, the hydrometeorological forcing conditions (inputs) or flood events (outputs) are conveniently parameterized by scalar representations, neglecting that the inputs are actually time series and that floods propagate spatially inland. Both facts ar…
▽ More
Surrogate models are often used to replace costly-to-evaluate complex coastal codes to achieve substantial computational savings. In many of those models, the hydrometeorological forcing conditions (inputs) or flood events (outputs) are conveniently parameterized by scalar representations, neglecting that the inputs are actually time series and that floods propagate spatially inland. Both facts are crucial in flood prediction for complex coastal systems. Our aim is to establish a surrogate model that accounts for time-varying inputs and provides information on spatially varying inland flooding. We introduce a multioutput Gaussian process model based on a separable kernel that correlates both functional inputs and spatial locations. Efficient implementations consider tensor-structured computations or sparse-variational approximations. In several experiments, we demonstrate the versatility of the model for both learning maps and inferring unobserved maps, numerically showing the convergence of predictions as the number of learning maps increases. We assess our framework in a coastal flood prediction application. Predictions are obtained with small error values within computation time highly compatible with short-term forecast requirements (on the order of minutes compared to the days required by hydrodynamic simulators). We conclude that our framework is a promising approach for forecast and early-warning systems.
△ Less
Submitted 17 October, 2021; v1 submitted 28 July, 2020;
originally announced July 2020.
-
Functional principal component analysis for global sensitivity analysis of model with spatial output
Authors:
T. V. E. Perrin,
O. Roustant,
J. Rohmer,
O. Alata,
J. P. Naulin,
D. Idier,
R. Pedreros,
D. Moncoulon,
P. Tinard
Abstract:
Motivated by risk assessment of coastal flooding, we consider time-consuming simulators with a spatial output. The aim is to perform sensitivity analysis (SA), quantifying the influence of input parameters on the output. There are three main issues. First, due to computational time, standard SA techniques cannot be directly applied on the simulator. Second, the output is infinite dimensional, or a…
▽ More
Motivated by risk assessment of coastal flooding, we consider time-consuming simulators with a spatial output. The aim is to perform sensitivity analysis (SA), quantifying the influence of input parameters on the output. There are three main issues. First, due to computational time, standard SA techniques cannot be directly applied on the simulator. Second, the output is infinite dimensional, or at least high dimensional if the output is discretized. Third, the spatial output is non-stationary and exhibits strong local variations. We show that all these issues can be addressed all together by using functional PCA (FPCA). We first specify a functional basis, such as wavelets or B-splines, designed to handle local variations. Secondly, we select the most influential basis terms, either with an energy criterion after basis orthonormalization, or directly on the original basis with a penalized regression approach. Then FPCA further reduces dimension by doing PCA on the most influential basis coefficients, with an ad-hoc metric. Finally, fast-to-evaluate metamodels are built on the few selected principal components. They provide a proxy on which SA can be done. As a by-product, we obtain analytical formulas for variance-based sensitivity indices, generalizing known formula assuming orthonormality of basis functions.
△ Less
Submitted 4 January, 2021; v1 submitted 20 May, 2020;
originally announced May 2020.
-
Approximating Gaussian Process Emulators with Linear Inequality Constraints and Noisy Observations via MC and MCMC
Authors:
Andrés F. López-Lopera,
François Bachoc,
Nicolas Durrande,
Jérémy Rohmer,
Déborah Idier,
Olivier Roustant
Abstract:
Adding inequality constraints (e.g. boundedness, monotonicity, convexity) into Gaussian processes (GPs) can lead to more realistic stochastic emulators. Due to the truncated Gaussianity of the posterior, its distribution has to be approximated. In this work, we consider Monte Carlo (MC) and Markov Chain Monte Carlo (MCMC) methods. However, strictly interpolating the observations may entail expensi…
▽ More
Adding inequality constraints (e.g. boundedness, monotonicity, convexity) into Gaussian processes (GPs) can lead to more realistic stochastic emulators. Due to the truncated Gaussianity of the posterior, its distribution has to be approximated. In this work, we consider Monte Carlo (MC) and Markov Chain Monte Carlo (MCMC) methods. However, strictly interpolating the observations may entail expensive computations due to highly restrictive sample spaces. Furthermore, having (constrained) GP emulators when data are actually noisy is also of interest for real-world implementations. Hence, we introduce a noise term for the relaxation of the interpolation conditions, and we develop the corresponding approximation of GP emulators under linear inequality constraints. We show with various toy examples that the performance of MC and MCMC samplers improves when considering noisy observations. Finally, on 2D and 5D coastal flooding applications, we show that more flexible and realistic GP implementations can be obtained by considering noise effects and by enforcing the (linear) inequality constraints.
△ Less
Submitted 21 June, 2019; v1 submitted 15 January, 2019;
originally announced January 2019.
-
Profile extrema for visualizing and quantifying uncertainties on excursion regions. Application to coastal flooding
Authors:
Dario Azzimonti,
David Ginsbourger,
Jérémy Rohmer,
Déborah Idier
Abstract:
We consider the problem of describing excursion sets of a real-valued function $f$, i.e. the set of inputs where $f$ is above a fixed threshold. Such regions are hard to visualize if the input space dimension, $d$, is higher than 2. For a given projection matrix from the input space to a lower dimensional (usually $1,2$) subspace, we introduce profile sup (inf) functions that associate to each poi…
▽ More
We consider the problem of describing excursion sets of a real-valued function $f$, i.e. the set of inputs where $f$ is above a fixed threshold. Such regions are hard to visualize if the input space dimension, $d$, is higher than 2. For a given projection matrix from the input space to a lower dimensional (usually $1,2$) subspace, we introduce profile sup (inf) functions that associate to each point in the projection's image the sup (inf) of the function constrained over the pre-image of this point by the considered projection. Plots of profile extrema functions convey a simple, although intrinsically partial, visualization of the set. We consider expensive to evaluate functions where only a very limited number of evaluations, $n$, is available, e.g. $n<100d$, and we surrogate $f$ with a posterior quantity of a Gaussian process (GP) model. We first compute profile extrema functions for the posterior mean given $n$ evaluations of $f$. We quantify the uncertainty on such estimates by studying the distribution of GP profile extrema with posterior quasi-realizations obtained from an approximating process. We control such approximation with a bound inherited from the Borell-TIS inequality. The technique is applied to analytical functions ($d=2,3$) and to a $5$-dimensional coastal flooding test case for a site located on the Atlantic French coast. Here $f$ is a numerical model returning the area of flooded surface in the coastal region given some offshore conditions. Profile extrema functions allowed us to better understand which offshore conditions impact large flooding events.
△ Less
Submitted 3 December, 2018; v1 submitted 2 October, 2017;
originally announced October 2017.