-
Reply to "Comment on `Past of a quantum particle revisited' "
Abstract: We stand by our findings in Phys. Rev A. 96, 022126 (2017). In addition to refuting the invalid objections raised by Peleg and Vaidman, we report a retrocausation problem inherent in Vaidman's definition of the past of a quantum particle.
Submitted 17 January, 2019; originally announced January 2019.
Comments: 3 pages, 2 figures; this is our Reply to the Comment in arXiv:1805.12171v1
Journal ref: Phys. Rev. A 99, 026104 (2019)
-
Past of a quantum particle: Common sense prevails
Abstract: We analyze Vaidman's three-path interferometer with weak path marking [Phys. Rev. A 87, 052104 (2013)] and find that common sense yields correct statements about the particle's path through the interferometer. This disagrees with the original claim that the particles have discontinuous trajectories at odds with common sense. In our analysis, "the particle's path" has operational meaning as acquire… ▽ More
Submitted 26 August, 2017; v1 submitted 12 April, 2017; originally announced April 2017.
Comments: v1: 20 pages, 15 figures; v2 and v3: 20 pages, 16 figures, text and figures edited, references updated
Journal ref: Phys. Rev. A 96, 022126 (2017)