Showing 1–3 of 3 results for author: Hilal, F

ECSeptional DNS Data: Evaluating Nameserver ECS Deployments with Response-Aware Scanning

Authors: Patrick Sattler, Johannes Zirngibl, Fahad Hilal, Oliver Gasser, Kevin Vermeulen, Georg Carle, Mattijs Jonker

Abstract: DNS is one of the cornerstones of the Internet. Nowadays, a substantial fraction of DNS queries are handled by public resolvers (e.g., Google Public DNS and Cisco's OpenDNS) rather than ISP nameservers. This behavior makes it difficult for authoritative nameservers to provide answers based on the requesting resolver. The impact is especially important for entities that make client origin inference… ▽ More DNS is one of the cornerstones of the Internet. Nowadays, a substantial fraction of DNS queries are handled by public resolvers (e.g., Google Public DNS and Cisco's OpenDNS) rather than ISP nameservers. This behavior makes it difficult for authoritative nameservers to provide answers based on the requesting resolver. The impact is especially important for entities that make client origin inferences to perform DNS-based load balancing (e.g., CDNS). The EDNS0 Client Subnet (ECS) option adds the client's IP prefix to DNS queries, which allows authoritative nameservers to provide prefix-based responses. In this study, we introduce a new method for conducting ECS scans, which provides insights into ECS behavior and significantly reduces the required number of queries by up to 97% compared to state-of-the-art techniques. Our approach is also the first to facilitate ECS scans for IPv6. We conduct a comprehensive evaluation of the ECS landscape, examining the usage and implementation of ECS across various services. Overall, 53% of all nameservers support prefix-based responses. Furthermore, we find that Google nameservers do not comply with the Google Public DNS guidelines. Lastly, we plan to make our tool, and data publicly available to foster further research in the area. △ Less

Submitted 8 May, 2025; v1 submitted 11 December, 2024; originally announced December 2024.

Analysis of the BraTS 2023 Intracranial Meningioma Segmentation Challenge

Authors: Dominic LaBella, Ujjwal Baid, Omaditya Khanna, Shan McBurney-Lin, Ryan McLean, Pierre Nedelec, Arif Rashid, Nourel Hoda Tahon, Talissa Altes, Radhika Bhalerao, Yaseen Dhemesh, Devon Godfrey, Fathi Hilal, Scott Floyd, Anastasia Janas, Anahita Fathi Kazerooni, John Kirkpatrick, Collin Kent, Florian Kofler, Kevin Leu, Nazanin Maleki, Bjoern Menze, Maxence Pajot, Zachary J. Reitman, Jeffrey D. Rudie , et al. (97 additional authors not shown)

Abstract: We describe the design and results from the BraTS 2023 Intracranial Meningioma Segmentation Challenge. The BraTS Meningioma Challenge differed from prior BraTS Glioma challenges in that it focused on meningiomas, which are typically benign extra-axial tumors with diverse radiologic and anatomical presentation and a propensity for multiplicity. Nine participating teams each developed deep-learning… ▽ More We describe the design and results from the BraTS 2023 Intracranial Meningioma Segmentation Challenge. The BraTS Meningioma Challenge differed from prior BraTS Glioma challenges in that it focused on meningiomas, which are typically benign extra-axial tumors with diverse radiologic and anatomical presentation and a propensity for multiplicity. Nine participating teams each developed deep-learning automated segmentation models using image data from the largest multi-institutional systematically expert annotated multilabel multi-sequence meningioma MRI dataset to date, which included 1000 training set cases, 141 validation set cases, and 283 hidden test set cases. Each case included T2, FLAIR, T1, and T1Gd brain MRI sequences with associated tumor compartment labels delineating enhancing tumor, non-enhancing tumor, and surrounding non-enhancing FLAIR hyperintensity. Participant automated segmentation models were evaluated and ranked based on a scoring system evaluating lesion-wise metrics including dice similarity coefficient (DSC) and 95% Hausdorff Distance. The top ranked team had a lesion-wise median dice similarity coefficient (DSC) of 0.976, 0.976, and 0.964 for enhancing tumor, tumor core, and whole tumor, respectively and a corresponding average DSC of 0.899, 0.904, and 0.871, respectively. These results serve as state-of-the-art benchmarks for future pre-operative meningioma automated segmentation algorithms. Additionally, we found that 1286 of 1424 cases (90.3%) had at least 1 compartment voxel abutting the edge of the skull-stripped image edge, which requires further investigation into optimal pre-processing face anonymization steps. △ Less

Submitted 7 March, 2025; v1 submitted 15 May, 2024; originally announced May 2024.

Comments: Accepted for publication at the Journal of Machine Learning for Biomedical Imaging (MELBA) https://melba-journal.org/2025:003 22 pages, 6 tables, 12 figures, MICCAI, MELBA

Journal ref: Machine.Learning.for.Biomedical.Imaging. 3 (2025)

The ASNR-MICCAI Brain Tumor Segmentation (BraTS) Challenge 2023: Intracranial Meningioma

Authors: Dominic LaBella, Maruf Adewole, Michelle Alonso-Basanta, Talissa Altes, Syed Muhammad Anwar, Ujjwal Baid, Timothy Bergquist, Radhika Bhalerao, Sully Chen, Verena Chung, Gian-Marco Conte, Farouk Dako, James Eddy, Ivan Ezhov, Devon Godfrey, Fathi Hilal, Ariana Familiar, Keyvan Farahani, Juan Eugenio Iglesias, Zhifan Jiang, Elaine Johanson, Anahita Fathi Kazerooni, Collin Kent, John Kirkpatrick, Florian Kofler , et al. (35 additional authors not shown)

Abstract: Meningiomas are the most common primary intracranial tumor in adults and can be associated with significant morbidity and mortality. Radiologists, neurosurgeons, neuro-oncologists, and radiation oncologists rely on multiparametric MRI (mpMRI) for diagnosis, treatment planning, and longitudinal treatment monitoring; yet automated, objective, and quantitative tools for non-invasive assessment of men… ▽ More Meningiomas are the most common primary intracranial tumor in adults and can be associated with significant morbidity and mortality. Radiologists, neurosurgeons, neuro-oncologists, and radiation oncologists rely on multiparametric MRI (mpMRI) for diagnosis, treatment planning, and longitudinal treatment monitoring; yet automated, objective, and quantitative tools for non-invasive assessment of meningiomas on mpMRI are lacking. The BraTS meningioma 2023 challenge will provide a community standard and benchmark for state-of-the-art automated intracranial meningioma segmentation models based on the largest expert annotated multilabel meningioma mpMRI dataset to date. Challenge competitors will develop automated segmentation models to predict three distinct meningioma sub-regions on MRI including enhancing tumor, non-enhancing tumor core, and surrounding nonenhancing T2/FLAIR hyperintensity. Models will be evaluated on separate validation and held-out test datasets using standardized metrics utilized across the BraTS 2023 series of challenges including the Dice similarity coefficient and Hausdorff distance. The models developed during the course of this challenge will aid in incorporation of automated meningioma MRI segmentation into clinical practice, which will ultimately improve care of patients with meningioma. △ Less

Submitted 12 May, 2023; originally announced May 2023.