Showing 1–14 of 14 results for author: Hientzsch, B

Hybrid least squares for learning functions from highly noisy data

Authors: Ben Adcock, Bernhard Hientzsch, Akil Narayan, Yiming Xu

Abstract: Motivated by the need for efficient estimation of conditional expectations, we consider a least-squares function approximation problem with heavily polluted data. Existing methods that are powerful in the small noise regime are suboptimal when large noise is present. We propose a hybrid approach that combines Christoffel sampling with certain types of optimal experimental design to address this is… ▽ More Motivated by the need for efficient estimation of conditional expectations, we consider a least-squares function approximation problem with heavily polluted data. Existing methods that are powerful in the small noise regime are suboptimal when large noise is present. We propose a hybrid approach that combines Christoffel sampling with certain types of optimal experimental design to address this issue. We show that the proposed algorithm enjoys appropriate optimality properties for both sample point generation and noise mollification, leading to improved computational efficiency and sample complexity compared to existing methods. We also extend the algorithm to convex-constrained settings with similar theoretical guarantees. When the target function is defined as the expectation of a random field, we extend our approach to leverage adaptive random subspaces and establish results on the approximation capacity of the adaptive procedure. Our theoretical findings are supported by numerical studies on both synthetic data and on a more challenging stochastic simulation problem in computational finance. △ Less

Submitted 2 July, 2025; originally announced July 2025.

Comments: 30 pages

Enforcing asymptotic behavior with DNNs for approximation and regression in finance

Authors: Hardik Routray, Bernhard Hientzsch

Abstract: We propose a simple methodology to approximate functions with given asymptotic behavior by specifically constructed terms and an unconstrained deep neural network (DNN). The methodology we describe extends to various asymptotic behaviors and multiple dimensions and is easy to implement. In this work we demonstrate it for linear asymptotic behavior in one-dimensional examples. We apply it to func… ▽ More We propose a simple methodology to approximate functions with given asymptotic behavior by specifically constructed terms and an unconstrained deep neural network (DNN). The methodology we describe extends to various asymptotic behaviors and multiple dimensions and is easy to implement. In this work we demonstrate it for linear asymptotic behavior in one-dimensional examples. We apply it to function approximation and regression problems where we measure approximation of only function values (``Vanilla Machine Learning''-VML) or also approximation of function and derivative values (``Differential Machine Learning''-DML) on several examples. We see that enforcing given asymptotic behavior leads to better approximation and faster convergence. △ Less

Submitted 7 July, 2025; v1 submitted 7 November, 2024; originally announced November 2024.

Comments: 24 Pages. Changed bibliography style so that ArXiv will be more likely to pick up citations and references

A case study on different one-factor Cheyette models for short maturity caplet calibration

Authors: Arun Kumar Polala, Bernhard Hientzsch

Abstract: In [1], we calibrated a one-factor Cheyette SLV model with a local volatility that is linear in the benchmark forward rate and an uncorrelated CIR stochastic variance to 3M caplets of various maturities. While caplet smiles for many maturities could be reasonably well calibrated across the range of strikes, for instance the 1Y maturity could not be calibrated well across that entire range of strik… ▽ More In [1], we calibrated a one-factor Cheyette SLV model with a local volatility that is linear in the benchmark forward rate and an uncorrelated CIR stochastic variance to 3M caplets of various maturities. While caplet smiles for many maturities could be reasonably well calibrated across the range of strikes, for instance the 1Y maturity could not be calibrated well across that entire range of strikes. Here, we study whether models with alternative local volatility terms and/or alternative stochastic volatility or variance models can calibrate the 1Y caplet smile better across the strike range better than the model studied in [1]. This is made possible and feasible by the generic simulation, pricing, and calibration frameworks introduced in [1] and some new frameworks presented in this paper. We find that some model settings calibrate well to the 1Y smile across the strike range under study. In particular, a model setting with a local volatility that is piece-wise linear in the benchmark forward rate together with an uncorrelated CIR stochastic variance and one with a local volatility that is linear in the benchmark rate together with a correlated lognormal stochastic volatility with quadratic drift (QDLNSV) as in [2] calibrate well. We discuss why the later might be a preferable model. [1] Arun Kumar Polala and Bernhard Hientzsch. Parametric differential machine learning for pricing and calibration. arXiv preprint arXiv:2302.06682 , 2023. [2] Artur Sepp and Parviz Rakhmonov. A Robust Stochastic Volatility Model for Interest Rate Dynamics. Risk Magazine, 2023 △ Less

Submitted 20 August, 2024; originally announced August 2024.

Inflation Models with Correlation and Skew

Authors: Orcan Ogetbil, Bernhard Hientzsch

Abstract: We formulate a forward inflation index model with multi-factor volatility structure featuring a parametric form that allows calibration to correlations between indices of different tenors observed in the market. Assuming the nominal interest rate follows a single factor Gaussian short rate model, we present analytical prices for zero-coupon and year-on-year swaps, caps, and floors. The same method… ▽ More We formulate a forward inflation index model with multi-factor volatility structure featuring a parametric form that allows calibration to correlations between indices of different tenors observed in the market. Assuming the nominal interest rate follows a single factor Gaussian short rate model, we present analytical prices for zero-coupon and year-on-year swaps, caps, and floors. The same method applies to any interest rate model for which one can compute the zero-coupon bond prices and measure shifts. We extend the multi-factor model with leverage functions to capture the entire market volatility skew with a single process. The time-consuming calibration step of this model can be avoided in the simplified model that we further propose. We demonstrate the leveraged and the simplified models with market data. △ Less

Submitted 8 May, 2024; originally announced May 2024.

Reinforcement Learning and Deep Stochastic Optimal Control for Final Quadratic Hedging

Authors: Bernhard Hientzsch

Abstract: We consider two data driven approaches, Reinforcement Learning (RL) and Deep Trajectory-based Stochastic Optimal Control (DTSOC) for hedging a European call option without and with transaction cost according to a quadratic hedging P&L objective at maturity ("variance-optimal hedging" or "final quadratic hedging"). We study the performance of the two approaches under various market environments (mo… ▽ More We consider two data driven approaches, Reinforcement Learning (RL) and Deep Trajectory-based Stochastic Optimal Control (DTSOC) for hedging a European call option without and with transaction cost according to a quadratic hedging P&L objective at maturity ("variance-optimal hedging" or "final quadratic hedging"). We study the performance of the two approaches under various market environments (modeled via the Black-Scholes and/or the log-normal SABR model) to understand their advantages and limitations. Without transaction costs and in the Black-Scholes model, both approaches match the performance of the variance-optimal Delta hedge. In the log-normal SABR model without transaction costs, they match the performance of the variance-optimal Barlett's Delta hedge. Agents trained on Black-Scholes trajectories with matching initial volatility but used on SABR trajectories match the performance of Bartlett's Delta hedge in average cost, but show substantially wider variance. To apply RL approaches to these problems, P&L at maturity is written as sum of step-wise contributions and variants of RL algorithms are implemented and used that minimize expectation of second moments of such sums. △ Less

Submitted 20 November, 2023; originally announced January 2024.

Comments: arXiv admin note: substantial text overlap with arXiv:2302.07996

A Comparison of Reinforcement Learning and Deep Trajectory Based Stochastic Control Agents for Stepwise Mean-Variance Hedging

Authors: Ali Fathi, Bernhard Hientzsch

Abstract: We consider two data-driven approaches to hedging, Reinforcement Learning and Deep Trajectory-based Stochastic Optimal Control, under a stepwise mean-variance objective. We compare their performance for a European call option in the presence of transaction costs under discrete trading schedules. We do this for a setting where stock prices follow Black-Scholes-Merton dynamics and the "book-keeping"… ▽ More We consider two data-driven approaches to hedging, Reinforcement Learning and Deep Trajectory-based Stochastic Optimal Control, under a stepwise mean-variance objective. We compare their performance for a European call option in the presence of transaction costs under discrete trading schedules. We do this for a setting where stock prices follow Black-Scholes-Merton dynamics and the "book-keeping" price for the option is given by the Black-Scholes-Merton model with the same parameters. This simulated data setting provides a "sanitized" lab environment with simple enough features where we can conduct a detailed study of strengths, features, issues, and limitations of these two approaches. However, the formulation is model free and could allow any other setting with available book-keeping prices. We consider this study as a first step to develop, test, and validate autonomous hedging agents, and we provide blueprints for such efforts that address various concerns and requirements. △ Less

Submitted 20 November, 2023; v1 submitted 15 February, 2023; originally announced February 2023.

Comments: 37 pages

Parametric Differential Machine Learning for Pricing and Calibration

Authors: Arun Kumar Polala, Bernhard Hientzsch

Abstract: Differential machine learning (DML) is a recently proposed technique that uses samplewise state derivatives to regularize least square fits to learn conditional expectations of functionals of stochastic processes as functions of state variables. Exploiting the derivative information leads to fewer samples than a vanilla ML approach for the same level of precision. This paper extends the methodolog… ▽ More Differential machine learning (DML) is a recently proposed technique that uses samplewise state derivatives to regularize least square fits to learn conditional expectations of functionals of stochastic processes as functions of state variables. Exploiting the derivative information leads to fewer samples than a vanilla ML approach for the same level of precision. This paper extends the methodology to parametric problems where the processes and functionals also depend on model and contract parameters, respectively. In addition, we propose adaptive parameter sampling to improve relative accuracy when the functionals have different magnitudes for different parameter sets. For calibration, we construct pricing surrogates for calibration instruments and optimize over them globally. We discuss strategies for robust calibration. We demonstrate the usefulness of our methodology on one-factor Cheyette models with benchmark rate volatility specification with an extra stochastic volatility factor on (two-curve) caplet prices at different strikes and maturities, first for parametric pricing, and then by calibrating to a given caplet volatility surface. To allow convenient and efficient simulation of processes and functionals and in particular the corresponding computation of samplewise derivatives, we propose to specify the processes and functionals in a low-code way close to mathematical notation which is then used to generate efficient computation of the functionals and derivatives in TensorFlow. △ Less

Submitted 19 February, 2023; v1 submitted 13 February, 2023; originally announced February 2023.

Comments: 45 pages

A Flexible Commodity Skew Model with Maturity Effects

Authors: Orcan Ogetbil, Bernhard Hientzsch

Abstract: We propose a non-parametric extension with leverage functions to the Andersen commodity curve model. We calibrate this model to market data for WTI and NG including option skew at the standard maturities. While the model can be calibrated by an analytical formula for the deterministic rate case, the stochastic rate case demands estimation of an expectation for which we employ Monte Carlo simulatio… ▽ More We propose a non-parametric extension with leverage functions to the Andersen commodity curve model. We calibrate this model to market data for WTI and NG including option skew at the standard maturities. While the model can be calibrated by an analytical formula for the deterministic rate case, the stochastic rate case demands estimation of an expectation for which we employ Monte Carlo simulation. We find that the market smile is captured for the deterministic rate case; and with relatively low number of paths, for the stochastic rate case. Since there is typically at most one standard maturity with liquid volatility data for each futures contract, there is flexibility on the shape of nonstandard maturity implied volatility and how the total implied variance accumulates. We equip the model with different total implied variance accumulators to demonstrate that flexibility. △ Less

Submitted 15 December, 2022; originally announced December 2022.

Estimating Future VaR from Value Samples and Applications to Future Initial Margin

Authors: Narayan Ganesan, Bernhard Hientzsch

Abstract: Predicting future values at risk (fVaR) is an important problem in finance. They arise in the modelling of future initial margin requirements for counterparty credit risk and future market risk VaR. One is also interested in derived quantities such as: i) Dynamic Initial Margin (DIM) and Margin Value Adjustment (MVA) in the counterparty risk context; and ii) risk weighted assets (RWA) and Capital… ▽ More Predicting future values at risk (fVaR) is an important problem in finance. They arise in the modelling of future initial margin requirements for counterparty credit risk and future market risk VaR. One is also interested in derived quantities such as: i) Dynamic Initial Margin (DIM) and Margin Value Adjustment (MVA) in the counterparty risk context; and ii) risk weighted assets (RWA) and Capital Value Adjustment (KVA) for market risk. This paper describes several methods that can be used to predict fVaRs. We begin with the Nested MC-empirical quantile method as benchmark, but it is too computationally intensive for routine use. We review several known methods and discuss their novel applications to the problem at hand. The techniques considered include computing percentiles from distributions (Normal and Johnson) that were matched to parametric moments or percentile estimates, quantile regressions methods, and others with more specific assumptions or requirements. We also consider how limited inner simulations can be used to improve the performance of these techniques. The paper also provides illustrations, results, and visualizations of intermediate and final results for the various approaches and methods. △ Less

Submitted 23 April, 2021; originally announced April 2021.

Comments: 26 pages

Calibrating Local Volatility Models with Stochastic Drift and Diffusion

Authors: Orcan Ogetbil, Narayan Ganesan, Bernhard Hientzsch

Abstract: We propose Monte Carlo calibration algorithms for three models: local volatility with stochastic interest rates, stochastic local volatility with deterministic interest rates, and finally stochastic local volatility with stochastic interest rates. For each model, we include detailed derivations of the corresponding SDE systems, and list the required input data and steps for calibration. We give co… ▽ More We propose Monte Carlo calibration algorithms for three models: local volatility with stochastic interest rates, stochastic local volatility with deterministic interest rates, and finally stochastic local volatility with stochastic interest rates. For each model, we include detailed derivations of the corresponding SDE systems, and list the required input data and steps for calibration. We give conditions under which a local volatility can exist given European option prices, stochastic interest rate model parameters, and correlations. The models are posed in a foreign exchange setting. The drift term for the exchange rate is given as a difference of two stochastic short rates, domestic and foreign, each modeled by a G1++ process. For stochastic volatility, we model the variance for the exchange rate by a CIR process. We include tests to show the convergence and the accuracy of the proposed algorithms. △ Less

Submitted 8 May, 2023; v1 submitted 30 September, 2020; originally announced September 2020.

Journal ref: International Journal of Theoretical and Applied Finance, 25(02):2250011, 2022

Backward Deep BSDE Methods and Applications to Nonlinear Problems

Authors: Yajie Yu, Bernhard Hientzsch, Narayan Ganesan

Abstract: In this paper, we present a backward deep BSDE method applied to Forward Backward Stochastic Differential Equations (FBSDE) with given terminal condition at maturity that time-steps the BSDE backwards. We present an application of this method to a nonlinear pricing problem - the differential rates problem. To time-step the BSDE backward, one needs to solve a nonlinear problem. For the differential… ▽ More In this paper, we present a backward deep BSDE method applied to Forward Backward Stochastic Differential Equations (FBSDE) with given terminal condition at maturity that time-steps the BSDE backwards. We present an application of this method to a nonlinear pricing problem - the differential rates problem. To time-step the BSDE backward, one needs to solve a nonlinear problem. For the differential rates problem, we derive an exact solution of this time-step problem and a Taylor-based approximation. Previously backward deep BSDE methods only treated zero or linear generators. While a Taylor approach for nonlinear generators was previously mentioned, it had not been implemented or applied, while we apply our method to nonlinear generators and derive details and present results. Likewise, previously backward deep BSDE methods were presented for fixed initial risk factor values $X_0$ only, while we present a version with random $X_0$ and a version that learns portfolio values at intermediate times as well. The method is able to solve nonlinear FBSDE problems in high dimensions. △ Less

Submitted 13 June, 2020; originally announced June 2020.

Comments: 25 pages

Pricing Barrier Options with DeepBSDEs

Authors: Narayan Ganesan, Yajie Yu, Bernhard Hientzsch

Abstract: This paper presents a novel and direct approach to price boundary and final-value problems, corresponding to barrier options, using forward deep learning to solve forward-backward stochastic differential equations (FBSDEs). Barrier instruments are instruments that expire or transform into another instrument if a barrier condition is satisfied before maturity; otherwise they perform like the instru… ▽ More This paper presents a novel and direct approach to price boundary and final-value problems, corresponding to barrier options, using forward deep learning to solve forward-backward stochastic differential equations (FBSDEs). Barrier instruments are instruments that expire or transform into another instrument if a barrier condition is satisfied before maturity; otherwise they perform like the instrument without the barrier condition. In the PDE formulation, this corresponds to adding boundary conditions to the final value problem. The deep BSDE methods developed so far have not addressed barrier/boundary conditions directly. We extend the forward deep BSDE to the barrier condition case by adding nodes to the computational graph to explicitly monitor the barrier conditions for each realization of the dynamics as well as nodes that preserve the time, state variables, and trading strategy value at barrier breach or at maturity otherwise. Given these additional nodes in the computational graph, the forward loss function quantifies the replication of the barrier or final payoff according to a chosen risk measure such as squared sum of differences. The proposed method can handle any barrier condition in the FBSDE set-up and any Dirichlet boundary conditions in the PDE set-up, both in low and high dimensions. △ Less

Submitted 11 September, 2024; v1 submitted 21 May, 2020; originally announced May 2020.

Comments: 20 pages

Journal ref: Journal of Computational Finance, 25(4):1-25 (2022)

Extensions of Dupire Formula: Stochastic Interest Rates and Stochastic Local Volatility

Authors: Orcan Ogetbil, Bernhard Hientzsch

Abstract: We derive generalizations of Dupire formula to the cases of general stochastic drift and/or stochastic local volatility. First, we handle a case in which the drift is given as difference of two stochastic short rates. Such a setting is natural in foreign exchange context where the short rates correspond to the short rates of the two currencies, equity single-currency context with stochastic divide… ▽ More We derive generalizations of Dupire formula to the cases of general stochastic drift and/or stochastic local volatility. First, we handle a case in which the drift is given as difference of two stochastic short rates. Such a setting is natural in foreign exchange context where the short rates correspond to the short rates of the two currencies, equity single-currency context with stochastic dividend yield, or commodity context with stochastic convenience yield. We present the formula both in a call surface formulation as well as total implied variance formulation where the latter avoids calendar spread arbitrage by construction. We provide derivations for the case where both short rates are given as single factor processes and present the limits for a single stochastic rate or all deterministic short rates. The limits agree with published results. Then we derive a formulation that allows a more general stochastic drift and diffusion including one or more stochastic local volatility terms. In the general setting, our derivation allows the computation and calibration of the leverage function for stochastic local volatility models. Despite being implicit, the generalized Dupire formulae can be used numerically in a fixed-point iterative scheme. △ Less

Submitted 24 February, 2023; v1 submitted 11 May, 2020; originally announced May 2020.

Introduction to Solving Quant Finance Problems with Time-Stepped FBSDE and Deep Learning

Authors: Bernhard Hientzsch

Abstract: In this introductory paper, we discuss how quantitative finance problems under some common risk factor dynamics for some common instruments and approaches can be formulated as time-continuous or time-discrete forward-backward stochastic differential equations (FBSDE) final-value or control problems, how these final value problems can be turned into control problems, how time-continuous problems ca… ▽ More In this introductory paper, we discuss how quantitative finance problems under some common risk factor dynamics for some common instruments and approaches can be formulated as time-continuous or time-discrete forward-backward stochastic differential equations (FBSDE) final-value or control problems, how these final value problems can be turned into control problems, how time-continuous problems can be turned into time-discrete problems, and how the forward and backward stochastic differential equations (SDE) can be time-stepped. We obtain both forward and backward time-stepped time-discrete stochastic control problems (where forward and backward indicate in which direction the Y SDE is time-stepped) that we will solve with optimization approaches using deep neural networks for the controls and stochastic gradient and other deep learning methods for the actual optimization/learning. We close with examples for the forward and backward methods for an European option pricing problem. Several methods and approaches are new. △ Less

Submitted 27 November, 2019; originally announced November 2019.

Comments: 24 pages