Iterative Decoder of Channel-polarized Multilevel Coding for Data Center Networks
Authors:
Takeshi Kakizaki,
Masanori Nakamura,
Fukutaro Hamaoka,
Shuto Yamamoto,
Etsushi Yamazaki
Abstract:
Data center networks (DCNs) require a low-cost, low-power optical transceiver to handle increased traffic from generative artificial intelligence, video streaming services, and more. Improving the required signal-to-noise ratio (RSNR) by digital signal processing such as forward error correction (FEC) mitigates the requirements for electrical and optical components. The optical transceivers in DCN…
▽ More
Data center networks (DCNs) require a low-cost, low-power optical transceiver to handle increased traffic from generative artificial intelligence, video streaming services, and more. Improving the required signal-to-noise ratio (RSNR) by digital signal processing such as forward error correction (FEC) mitigates the requirements for electrical and optical components. The optical transceivers in DCNs exploit a low-complexity soft-decision (SD) FEC, consisting of short block-length linear error-correcting codes and a low-complexity SD decoder (SDD), such as a Chase decoder and ordered statistical decoding. The low complexity SDD efficiently approaches a maximum likelihood decoding (MLD). However, the decoding performance of MLD is limited by its finite block length. In this paper, we describe the detail of our proposed channel-polarized multilevel coding with iterative decoding (CP-MLC-ID), which improves the decoding performance. The 19.5$\%$-OH CP-MLC-ID 128-bit extended Bose-Chaudhuri-Hocquenghem (eBCH) and KP4 codes outperform the concatenated eBCH and KP4 codes with a net coding gain of 0.25 and 0.40 dB for the same and double the number of SDDs, respectively. We also investigate the dependency of the decoding performance on the size of a bit interleaver. The performance degradation of CP-MLC-ID using an 8-bit interleaver is about 0.1 dB compared to using the large-bit interleaver. Our results indicate that even a weak connection by exclusive-OR between codewords improves the decoding performance, compared to simple concatenated codes in the DCNs.
△ Less
Submitted 25 March, 2025; v1 submitted 25 March, 2025;
originally announced March 2025.
Laser Phase Noise Tolerance of Uniform and Probabilistically-shaped QAM Signals for High Spectral Efficiency Systems
Authors:
Takeo Sasai,
Asuka Matsushita,
Masanori Nakamura,
Seiji Okamoto,
Fukutaro Hamaoka,
Yoshiaki Kisaka
Abstract:
We numerically and experimentally investigate the laser phase noise tolerance of probabilistically shaped (PS) and uniformly shaped (US) quadrature amplitude modulation (QAM) signals. In the simulations, we compare PS-64QAM to US-16QAM, PS-256QAM to US-64QAM, and PS-1024QAM to US-256QAM under the same information rate (IR). We confirm that a sufficient shaping gain is observed with narrow linewidt…
▽ More
We numerically and experimentally investigate the laser phase noise tolerance of probabilistically shaped (PS) and uniformly shaped (US) quadrature amplitude modulation (QAM) signals. In the simulations, we compare PS-64QAM to US-16QAM, PS-256QAM to US-64QAM, and PS-1024QAM to US-256QAM under the same information rate (IR). We confirm that a sufficient shaping gain is observed with narrow linewidth lasers, whereas degradation of the shaping gain is clearly observed when large phase noise and high order modulation formats are assumed. In our experiments, we compare polarization-division-multiplexed (PDM) 16-GBd PS-1024QAM and US-256QAM under the same IR using lasers with 0.1-kHz and 40-kHz linewidths. For carrier phase recovery (CPR), we employ a pilot-assisted digital phase locked loop. Results reveal that PS-1024QAM achieves high performance with the 0.1 kHz-laser or > 5% pilot ratio, whereas US-256QAM outperforms PS-1024QAM when lasers with 40-kHz linewidth and < 5% pilot ratio are used. We also evaluate the pilot ratio dependency of the required optical signal-to-noise ratio at the forward error correction limit and the achievable information rate. Additionally, we compare the performance of two types of CPR updating schemes: updating phase estimation at only the pilot symbol or at all symbols.
△ Less
Submitted 14 December, 2020;
originally announced December 2020.
