Showing 1–13 of 13 results for author: Haghani, M

Transcending Dimensions using Generative AI: Real-Time 3D Model Generation in Augmented Reality

Authors: Majid Behravan, Maryam Haghani, Denis Gracanin

Abstract: Traditional 3D modeling requires technical expertise, specialized software, and time-intensive processes, making it inaccessible for many users. Our research aims to lower these barriers by combining generative AI and augmented reality (AR) into a cohesive system that allows users to easily generate, manipulate, and interact with 3D models in real time, directly within AR environments. Utilizing c… ▽ More Traditional 3D modeling requires technical expertise, specialized software, and time-intensive processes, making it inaccessible for many users. Our research aims to lower these barriers by combining generative AI and augmented reality (AR) into a cohesive system that allows users to easily generate, manipulate, and interact with 3D models in real time, directly within AR environments. Utilizing cutting-edge AI models like Shap-E, we address the complex challenges of transforming 2D images into 3D representations in AR environments. Key challenges such as object isolation, handling intricate backgrounds, and achieving seamless user interaction are tackled through advanced object detection methods, such as Mask R-CNN. Evaluation results from 35 participants reveal an overall System Usability Scale (SUS) score of 69.64, with participants who engaged with AR/VR technologies more frequently rating the system significantly higher, at 80.71. This research is particularly relevant for applications in gaming, education, and AR-based e-commerce, offering intuitive, model creation for users without specialized skills. △ Less

Submitted 27 April, 2025; originally announced April 2025.

Revisiting the paper Simulating dynamical features of escape panic: What have we learnt since then?

Authors: Milad Haghani, Enrico Ronchi

Abstract: The paper "Simulating dynamical features of escape panic" by Helbing, Farkas, and Vicsek, published over two decades ago in Nature, has left an indelible mark on the field of crowd dynamics. With nearly 3,000 citations to date, according to the Web of Science records, and significant influence, it has shaped the crowd dynamics field. This analysis investigates the overall influence of this paper t… ▽ More The paper "Simulating dynamical features of escape panic" by Helbing, Farkas, and Vicsek, published over two decades ago in Nature, has left an indelible mark on the field of crowd dynamics. With nearly 3,000 citations to date, according to the Web of Science records, and significant influence, it has shaped the crowd dynamics field. This analysis investigates the overall influence of this paper through a variety of indicators, mapping its reach across research areas. The intellectual foundation of the paper is traced, examining the references cited. The terminological impact is also explored, showing how the paper made use of terms like "panic" and "herding". Moreover, the alignment of the assumptions of the paper with empirical evidence is discussed, finding discrepancies in key assertions about panic behaviour. The numerical simulations of the paper and observations have significantly influenced the field, such as for the case of the "faster-is-slower" phenomenon. The paper remains a key pillar in crowd dynamics, nevertheless, we advocate for a new course of the field shifting away from the terminology adopted in the paper and focusing more on empirical evidence. △ Less

Submitted 31 October, 2023; originally announced October 2023.

Comments: Submission to the Special Issue of the Pedestrian and Evacuation Dynamics conference 2023

ACM Class: J.4; K.4

How crowd accidents are reported in the news media: Lexical and sentiment analysis

Authors: Claudio Feliciani, Alessandro Corbetta, Milad Haghani, Katsuhiro Nishinari

Abstract: The portrayal of crowd accidents by the media can influence public understanding and emotional response, shaping societal perceptions and potentially impacting safety measures and preparedness strategies. This paper critically examines the portrayal of crowd accidents in news coverage by analyzing the texts of 372 media reports of crowd accidents spanning 26 diverse news sources from 1900 to 2019.… ▽ More The portrayal of crowd accidents by the media can influence public understanding and emotional response, shaping societal perceptions and potentially impacting safety measures and preparedness strategies. This paper critically examines the portrayal of crowd accidents in news coverage by analyzing the texts of 372 media reports of crowd accidents spanning 26 diverse news sources from 1900 to 2019. We investigate how media representations of crowd accidents vary across time and geographical origins. Our methodology combines lexical analysis to unveil prevailing terminologies and sentiment analysis to discern the emotional tenor of the reports. The findings reveal the prevalence of the term "stampede" over "panic" in media descriptions of crowd accidents. Notably, divergent patterns are observable when comparing Western versus South Asian media (notably India and Pakistan), unveiling a cross-cultural dimension. Moreover, the analysis detects a gradual transition from "crowd stampede" to "crowd crush" in media and Wikipedia narratives in recent years, suggesting evolving lexical sensitivities. Sentiment analysis uncovers a consistent association with fear-related language, indicative of media's propensity towards sensationalism. This fear-infused narrative has intensified over time. The study underscores the potential impact of language and sentiment in shaping public perspectives on crowd accidents, revealing a pressing need for responsible and balanced reporting that moves beyond sensationalism and promotes a nuanced understanding. This will be crucial for increasing public awareness and preparedness against such accidents. △ Less

Submitted 26 December, 2023; v1 submitted 25 September, 2023; originally announced September 2023.

Comments: 54 pages, 15 figures, 17 tables, 4 appendixes, 372 media reports

Journal ref: Safety Science 172C (2024) 106423

The Evaluation of a New Daylighting System's Energy Performance: Reversible Daylighting System (RDS)

Authors: Masoome Haghani, Behrouz Mohammadkari, Rima Fayaz

Abstract: This paper evaluates the energy performance of a new daylighting system, patented by the author, in a regular closed office space. The advantage of this new system as opposed to conventional venetian blinds is its rotating capability, which improves the energy efficiency of the space. Computer simulation method has been conducted to examine the performance of this new system on the south aperture… ▽ More This paper evaluates the energy performance of a new daylighting system, patented by the author, in a regular closed office space. The advantage of this new system as opposed to conventional venetian blinds is its rotating capability, which improves the energy efficiency of the space. Computer simulation method has been conducted to examine the performance of this new system on the south aperture of a closed-office space with 30% Window to Wall ratio (WWR) in three cities in Iran with different climate zones based on ASHRAE: Tehran (3B), Tabriz (4B), and Yazd (2B). The simulation has been implemented in Honeybee platform with EnergyPlus engine to simulate the combined total load consisting of heating, cooling, and lighting loads. To control lighting, a dimming control is applied to the space. The results of the study represent the benefits of the reversible daylighting system (RDS) over the state of the art venetian blinds to improve the energy efficiency of the space through just changing the location of the blind during heating/cooling demand time of the year. △ Less

Submitted 13 March, 2023; originally announced March 2023.

Journal ref: 2022 Building Performance Analysis Conference and SimBuild co-organized by ASHRAE and IBPSA-USA, pp 165-172

The notion of validity in experimental crowd dynamics

Authors: Milad Haghani

Abstract: As experimental methods become increasingly popular in crowd dynamics, the question of experimental validity becomes more critical than ever. For the purposes of evaluation of crowd experiments, it is paramount that we distinguish between different dimensions of their validity. Here, we differentiate between four types of experimentation in crowd dynamics based on their underlying purpose of inves… ▽ More As experimental methods become increasingly popular in crowd dynamics, the question of experimental validity becomes more critical than ever. For the purposes of evaluation of crowd experiments, it is paramount that we distinguish between different dimensions of their validity. Here, we differentiate between four types of experimentation in crowd dynamics based on their underlying purpose of investigation. This includes experiments whose main aim is (i) testing a behavioural theory/hypothesis, (ii) exploring empirical behavioural regularities; (iii) assessing collective (system-level) performance rather than individual behaviour (iv) calibrating and/or validating pre-existing models. While delineating various dimensions of external/internal validity as they relate to crowd experiments, we argue how the importance of different validity dimensions varies depending on investigation purpose. This could provide clarity about circumstances where artificiality of laboratory settings is justified as opposed to experiments for which higher levels of contextual fidelity should be given more weight. It is critical that investigators (a) be conscious of the trade-off between controllability and realism in their experiment design and (b) identify potential factors that can jeopardise validity of their experiments and mitigate them. Inferences made from field data do not invariably supersede those of experiments on the issue of validity. Depending on the purpose of investigation, maintaining internal validity sometimes necessitates laboratory settings and justifies artificiality. In the absence of adequate control over the causal relationship, the question of external validity will be futile. Therefore, striking a reasonable balance between internal and external validity of crowd experiments should be made a major design consideration. △ Less

Submitted 18 November, 2021; originally announced December 2021.

Investigating Exit Choice in Built Environment Evacuation combining Immersive Virtual Reality and Discrete Choice Modelling

Authors: R Lovreglio, E Dillies, E Kuligowski, A Rahouti, M Haghani

Abstract: In the event of a fire emergency in the built environment, occupants face a range of evacuation decisions, including the choice of exits. An important question from the standpoint of evacuation safety is how evacuees make these choices and what factors affect their choices. Understanding how humans weigh these (often) competing factors is essential knowledge for evacuation planning and safe design… ▽ More In the event of a fire emergency in the built environment, occupants face a range of evacuation decisions, including the choice of exits. An important question from the standpoint of evacuation safety is how evacuees make these choices and what factors affect their choices. Understanding how humans weigh these (often) competing factors is essential knowledge for evacuation planning and safe design. Here, we use immersive Virtual Reality (VR) experiments to investigate, in controlled settings, how these trade-offs are made using empirical data and econometric choice models. In each VR scenario, participants are confronted with trade-offs between choosing exits that are familiar to them, exits that are less occupied, exits that are nearer to them and exits to which visibility is less affected by fire smoke. The marginal role of these competing factors on their decisions is quantified in a discrete choice model. Post-experiment questionnaires also determine factors such as their perceived realism and emotion evoked by the VR evacuation experience. Results indicate that none of the investigated factors dominated the others in terms of their influence on exit choices. The participants exhibited patterns of multi-attribute conjoint decision-making, consistent with the recent findings in the literature. While lack of familiarity and the presence of smoke both negatively affected the desirability of an exit to evacuees, neither solely determined exit choice. It was also observed that prioritisation of the said factors by participants changed during the repeated scenarios when compared to the first scenario that they experienced. Results have implications for both fire safety designs and future VR evacuation experiment designs. These empirical models can also be employed as input in computer simulations of building evacuation. △ Less

Submitted 22 October, 2021; originally announced October 2021.

Calibrating parameters of crowd evacuation simulation at strategic, tactical and operational levels: Which one matters most?

Authors: Milad Haghani, Majid Sarvi

Abstract: Background: Simulating a process of crowd evacuation using an agent-based model requires modellers to specify values of a whole range of parameters each determining certain aspects of evacuee behaviour. While potential sensitivity of simulation outputs to each single parameter is undoubted, one critical question is that to which class of parameters such numerical models are most sensitive when est… ▽ More Background: Simulating a process of crowd evacuation using an agent-based model requires modellers to specify values of a whole range of parameters each determining certain aspects of evacuee behaviour. While potential sensitivity of simulation outputs to each single parameter is undoubted, one critical question is that to which class of parameters such numerical models are most sensitive when estimating evacuation times? The question is of significance given that available data and resources for calibration are limited and priorities often need to be made. Methods: Here, we employ a simulation model of evacuation comprised of multiple integrated layers. After providing an overview of the calibration procedure for key parameters, we perform extensive sensitivity analyses in complex simulated spaces with large crowds to answer the above question. Findings: Our analyses showed that, once parameters are contrasted on a consistent and comparable scale, estimates of simulated evacuation time are, by far margins, most sensitive to the value of mechanical movement parameters at locomotion layer, those that determine the discharge rate at bottlenecks. The next most critical set of parameters were those that determine the rate of direction choice adaptation followed by those that determine the effect of inter-individual interactions on direction choices. Conclusions: These results suggest that, in order to produce realistic evacuation times using simulation, the most critical aspect is, by far, perfecting the simulated flowrates at bottlenecks. Implications: This highlights the crucial need for furthering the accuracy of existing empirical estimates for exit capacity; and developing more rigorous calibration methods for parameters that determine flowrates at bottlenecks. If a model does not produce bottleneck flowrates accurately, efforts to refine other aspects of simulation might be in vain. △ Less

Submitted 7 September, 2021; originally announced September 2021.

Structure and temporal evolution of transportation literature

Authors: Milad Haghani, Michiel C. J. Bliemer

Abstract: Fifty years of evolution of the transportation field is revisited at a macro scale using scientometric analysis of all publications in all 39 journals indexed in the category of Transportation by the Web of Science. The size of the literature is estimated to have reached 50,000 documents. At the highest level of aggregation, four major divisions of the literature are differentiated through these a… ▽ More Fifty years of evolution of the transportation field is revisited at a macro scale using scientometric analysis of all publications in all 39 journals indexed in the category of Transportation by the Web of Science. The size of the literature is estimated to have reached 50,000 documents. At the highest level of aggregation, four major divisions of the literature are differentiated through these analyses, namely (i) network analysis and traffic flow, (ii) economics of transportation and logistics, (iii) travel behaviour, and (iv) road safety. Influential and emerging authors of each division are identified. Temporal trends in transportation research are also investigated via document co-citation analysis. This analysis identifies various major streams of transportation research while determining their approximate time of emergence and duration of activity. It documents topics that have been most trendy at any period of time during the last fifty years. Three clusters associated with the travel behaviour division (collectively embodying topics of land-use, active transportation, residential self-selection, traveller experience/satisfaction, social exclusion and transport/spatial equity), one cluster of statistical modelling of road accidents, and a cluster of network modelling linked predominantly to the notion of macroscopic fundamental diagram demonstrate characteristics of being current hot topics of the field. Three smaller clusters linked predominantly to electric mobility and autonomous/automated vehicles show characteristics of being emerging hot topics. A cluster labelled shared mobility is the youngest emerging cluster. Influential articles within each cluster of references are identified. Additional outcomes are the determination the influential outsiders of the transportation field. △ Less

Submitted 27 July, 2021; originally announced July 2021.

Sleeping beauties and temporal evolution of the coronavirus literature

Authors: Milad Haghani, Pegah Varamini

Abstract: Temporal evolution of the coronavirus literature over the last thirty years (N=43,769) is analyzed along with its subdomain of SARS-CoV-2 articles (N=27,460) and the subdomain of reviews and meta-analytic studies (N=1,027). (i) The analyses on the subset of SARS-CoV-2 literature identified studies published prior to 2020 that have now proven highly instrumental in the development of various cluste… ▽ More Temporal evolution of the coronavirus literature over the last thirty years (N=43,769) is analyzed along with its subdomain of SARS-CoV-2 articles (N=27,460) and the subdomain of reviews and meta-analytic studies (N=1,027). (i) The analyses on the subset of SARS-CoV-2 literature identified studies published prior to 2020 that have now proven highly instrumental in the development of various clusters of publications linked to SARS-CoV-2. In particular, the so-called sleeping beauties of the coronavirus literature with an awakening in 2020 were identified, i.e., previously published studies of this literature that had remained relatively unnoticed for several years but gained sudden traction in 2020 in the wake of the SARS-CoV-2 outbreak. (ii) The subset of 2020 SARS-CoV-2 articles is bibliographically distant from the rest of this literature published prior to 2020. Individual articles of the SARS-CoV-2 segment with a bridging role between the two bodies of articles (i.e., before and after 2020) are identifiable. (iii) Furthermore, the degree of bibliographic coupling within the 2020 SARS-CoV-2 cluster is much poorer compared to the cluster of articles published prior to 2020. This could, in part, be explained by the higher diversity of topics that are studied in relation to SARS-CoV-2 compared to the literature of coronaviruses published prior to the SARS-CoV-2 disease. This work demonstrates how scholarly efforts undertaken during peace time or prior to a disease outbreak could suddenly play a critical role in prevention and mitigation of health disasters caused by new diseases. △ Less

Submitted 10 June, 2021; v1 submitted 9 June, 2021; originally announced June 2021.

Hypothetical bias in stated choice experiments: Part II. Macro-scale analysis of literature and effectiveness of bias mitigation methods

Authors: Milad Haghani, Michiel C. J. Bliemer, John M. Rose, Harmen Oppewal, Emily Lancsar

Abstract: This paper reviews methods of hypothetical bias (HB) mitigation in choice experiments (CEs). It presents a bibliometric analysis and summary of empirical evidence of their effectiveness. The paper follows the review of empirical evidence on the existence of HB presented in Part I of this study. While the number of CE studies has rapidly increased since 2010, the critical issue of HB has been studi… ▽ More This paper reviews methods of hypothetical bias (HB) mitigation in choice experiments (CEs). It presents a bibliometric analysis and summary of empirical evidence of their effectiveness. The paper follows the review of empirical evidence on the existence of HB presented in Part I of this study. While the number of CE studies has rapidly increased since 2010, the critical issue of HB has been studied in only a small fraction of CE studies. The present review includes both ex-ante and ex-post bias mitigation methods. Ex-ante bias mitigation methods include cheap talk, real talk, consequentiality scripts, solemn oath scripts, opt-out reminders, budget reminders, honesty priming, induced truth telling, indirect questioning, time to think and pivot designs. Ex-post methods include follow-up certainty calibration scales, respondent perceived consequentiality scales, and revealed-preference-assisted estimation. It is observed that the use of mitigation methods markedly varies across different sectors of applied economics. The existing empirical evidence points to their overall effectives in reducing HB, although there is some variation. The paper further discusses how each mitigation method can counter a certain subset of HB sources. Considering the prevalence of HB in CEs and the effectiveness of bias mitigation methods, it is recommended that implementation of at least one bias mitigation method (or a suitable combination where possible) becomes standard practice in conducting CEs. Mitigation method(s) suited to the particular application should be implemented to ensure that inferences and subsequent policy decisions are as much as possible free of HB. △ Less

Submitted 4 February, 2021; originally announced February 2021.

Hypothetical bias in stated choice experiments: Part I. Integrative synthesis of empirical evidence and conceptualisation of external validity

Authors: Milad Haghani, Michiel C. J. Bliemer, John M. Rose, Harmen Oppewal, Emily Lancsar

Abstract: The notion of hypothetical bias (HB) constitutes, arguably, the most fundamental issue in relation to the use of hypothetical survey methods. Whether or to what extent choices of survey participants and subsequent inferred estimates translate to real-world settings continues to be debated. While HB has been extensively studied in the broader context of contingent valuation, it is much less underst… ▽ More The notion of hypothetical bias (HB) constitutes, arguably, the most fundamental issue in relation to the use of hypothetical survey methods. Whether or to what extent choices of survey participants and subsequent inferred estimates translate to real-world settings continues to be debated. While HB has been extensively studied in the broader context of contingent valuation, it is much less understood in relation to choice experiments (CE). This paper reviews the empirical evidence for HB in CE in various fields of applied economics and presents an integrative framework for how HB relates to external validity. Results suggest mixed evidence on the prevalence, extent and direction of HB as well as considerable context and measurement dependency. While HB is found to be an undeniable issue when conducting CEs, the empirical evidence on HB does not render CEs unable to represent real-world preferences. While health-related choice experiments often find negligible degrees of HB, experiments in consumer behaviour and transport domains suggest that significant degrees of HB are ubiquitous. Assessments of bias in environmental valuation studies provide mixed evidence. Also, across these disciplines many studies display HB in their total willingness to pay estimates and opt-in rates but not in their hypothetical marginal rates of substitution (subject to scale correction). Further, recent findings in psychology and brain imaging studies suggest neurocognitive mechanisms underlying HB that may explain some of the discrepancies and unexpected findings in the mainstream CE literature. The review also observes how the variety of operational definitions of HB prohibits consistent measurement of HB in CE. The paper further identifies major sources of HB and possible moderating factors. Finally, it explains how HB represents one component of the wider concept of external validity. △ Less

Submitted 4 February, 2021; originally announced February 2021.

Applications of brain imaging methods in driving behaviour research

Authors: Milad Haghani, Michiel C. J. Bliemer, Bilal Farooq, Inhi Kim, Zhibin Li, Cheol Oh, Zahra Shahhoseini, Hamish MacDougall

Abstract: Applications of neuroimaging methods have substantially contributed to the scientific understanding of human factors during driving by providing a deeper insight into the neuro-cognitive aspects of driver brain. This has been achieved by conducting simulated (and occasionally, field) driving experiments while collecting driver brain signals of certain types. Here, this sector of studies is compreh… ▽ More Applications of neuroimaging methods have substantially contributed to the scientific understanding of human factors during driving by providing a deeper insight into the neuro-cognitive aspects of driver brain. This has been achieved by conducting simulated (and occasionally, field) driving experiments while collecting driver brain signals of certain types. Here, this sector of studies is comprehensively reviewed at both macro and micro scales. Different themes of neuroimaging driving behaviour research are identified and the findings within each theme are synthesised. The surveyed literature has reported on applications of four major brain imaging methods. These include Functional Magnetic Resonance Imaging (fMRI), Electroencephalography (EEG), Functional Near-Infrared Spectroscopy (fNIRS) and Magnetoencephalography (MEG), with the first two being the most common methods in this domain. While collecting driver fMRI signal has been particularly instrumental in studying neural correlates of intoxicated driving (e.g. alcohol or cannabis) or distracted driving, the EEG method has been predominantly utilised in relation to the efforts aiming at development of automatic fatigue/drowsiness detection systems, a topic to which the literature on neuro-ergonomics of driving particularly has shown a spike of interest within the last few years. The survey also reveals that topics such as driver brain activity in semi-automated settings or the brain activity of drivers with brain injuries or chronic neurological conditions have by contrast been investigated to a very limited extent. Further, potential topics in relation to driving behaviour are identified that could benefit from the adoption of neuroimaging methods in future studies. △ Less

Submitted 18 July, 2020; originally announced July 2020.

Covid-19 pandemic and the unprecedented mobilisation of scholarly efforts prompted by a health crisis: Scientometric comparisons across SARS, MERS and 2019-nCov literature

Authors: Milad Haghani, Michiel C. J. Bliemer

Abstract: During the current century, each major coronavirus outbreak has triggered a quick surge of academic publications on this topic. The spike in research publications following the 2019 Novel Coronavirus (Covid-19), however, has been like no other. The global crisis caused by the Covid-19 pandemic has mobilised scientific efforts in an unprecedented way. In less than five months, more than 12,000 rese… ▽ More During the current century, each major coronavirus outbreak has triggered a quick surge of academic publications on this topic. The spike in research publications following the 2019 Novel Coronavirus (Covid-19), however, has been like no other. The global crisis caused by the Covid-19 pandemic has mobilised scientific efforts in an unprecedented way. In less than five months, more than 12,000 research items have been indexed while the number increasing every day. With the crisis affecting all aspects of life, research on Covid-19 seems to have become a focal point of interest across many academic disciplines. Here, scientometric aspects of the Covid-19 literature are analysed and contrasted with those of the two previous major Coronavirus diseases, i.e. SARS and MERS. The focus is on the co-occurrence of key-terms, bibliographic coupling and citation relations of journals and collaborations between countries. Certain recurring patterns across all three literatures were discovered. All three outbreaks have commonly generated three distinct and major cohort of studies: (i) studies linked to the public health response and epidemic control, (ii) studies associated with the chemical constitution of the virus and (iii) studies related to treatment, vaccine and clinical care. While studies affiliated with the category (i) seem to have been the first to emerge, they overall received least numbers of citations compared to those of the two other categories. Covid-19 studies seem to have been distributed across a broader variety of journals and subject areas. Clear links are observed between the geographical origins of each outbreak or the local geographical severity of each outbreak and the magnitude of research originated from regions. Covid-19 studies also display the involvement of authors from a broader variety of countries compared to SARS and MRS. △ Less

Submitted 31 May, 2020; originally announced June 2020.

Journal ref: Scientometrics (2020)