Evolutionary mismatch and the role of GxE interactions in human disease
Authors:
Amanda J. Lea,
Andrew G. Clark,
Andrew W. Dahl,
Orrin Devinsky,
Angela R. Garcia,
Christopher D. Golden,
Joseph Kamau,
Thomas S. Kraft,
Yvonne A. L. Lim,
Dino Martins,
Donald Mogoi,
Paivi Pajukanta,
George Perry,
Herman Pontzer,
Benjamin C. Trumble,
Samuel S. Urlacher,
Vivek V. Venkataraman,
Ian J. Wallace,
Michael Gurven,
Daniel Lieberman,
Julien F. Ayroles
Abstract:
Globally, we are witnessing the rise of complex, non-communicable diseases (NCDs) related to changes in our daily environments. Obesity, asthma, cardiovascular disease, and type 2 diabetes are part of a long list of "lifestyle" diseases that were rare throughout human history but are now common. A key idea from anthropology and evolutionary biology--the evolutionary mismatch hypothesis--seeks to e…
▽ More
Globally, we are witnessing the rise of complex, non-communicable diseases (NCDs) related to changes in our daily environments. Obesity, asthma, cardiovascular disease, and type 2 diabetes are part of a long list of "lifestyle" diseases that were rare throughout human history but are now common. A key idea from anthropology and evolutionary biology--the evolutionary mismatch hypothesis--seeks to explain this phenomenon. It posits that humans evolved in environments that radically differ from the ones experienced by most people today, and thus traits that were advantageous in past environments may now be "mismatched" and disease-causing. This hypothesis is, at its core, a genetic one: it predicts that loci with a history of selection will exhibit "genotype by environment" (GxE) interactions and have differential health effects in ancestral versus modern environments. Here, we discuss how this concept could be leveraged to uncover the genetic architecture of NCDs in a principled way. Specifically, we advocate for partnering with small-scale, subsistence-level groups that are currently transitioning from environments that are arguably more "matched" with their recent evolutionary history to those that are more "mismatched". These populations provide diverse genetic backgrounds as well as the needed levels and types of environmental variation necessary for mapping GxE interactions in an explicit mismatch framework. Such work would make important contributions to our understanding of environmental and genetic risk factors for NCDs across diverse ancestries and sociocultural contexts.
△ Less
Submitted 13 February, 2023; v1 submitted 12 January, 2023;
originally announced January 2023.
Dynamical Structure of a Traditional Amazonian Social Network
Authors:
Paul L. Hooper,
Simon DeDeo,
Ann E. Caldwell Hooper,
Michael Gurven,
Hillard S. Kaplan
Abstract:
Reciprocity is a vital feature of social networks, but relatively little is known about its temporal structure or the mechanisms underlying its persistence in real world behavior. In pursuit of these two questions, we study the stationary and dynamical signals of reciprocity in a network of manioc beer (Spanish: chicha; Tsimane': shocdye') drinking events in a Tsimane' village in lowland Bolivia.…
▽ More
Reciprocity is a vital feature of social networks, but relatively little is known about its temporal structure or the mechanisms underlying its persistence in real world behavior. In pursuit of these two questions, we study the stationary and dynamical signals of reciprocity in a network of manioc beer (Spanish: chicha; Tsimane': shocdye') drinking events in a Tsimane' village in lowland Bolivia. At the stationary level, our analysis reveals that social exchange within the community is heterogeneously patterned according to kinship and spatial proximity. A positive relationship between the frequencies at which two families host each other, controlling for kinship and proximity, provides evidence for stationary reciprocity. Our analysis of the dynamical structure of this network presents a novel method for the study of conditional, or non-stationary, reciprocity effects. We find evidence that short-timescale reciprocity (within three days) is present among non- and distant-kin pairs; conversely, we find that levels of cooperation among close kin can be accounted for on the stationary hypothesis alone.
△ Less
Submitted 17 November, 2013; v1 submitted 1 July, 2013;
originally announced July 2013.
