Optical Variability of the Three Brightest Nearby Quasars
Authors:
C. Martin Gaskell,
Andrew J. Benker,
Jeffrey S. Campbell,
Thomas A. George,
Cecelia H. Hedrick,
Mary E. Hiller,
Elizabeth S. Klimek,
Joseph P. Leonard,
Shoji Masatoshi,
Bradley W. Peterson,
Kelly C. Peterson,
Kelly M. Sanders
Abstract:
We report on the relative optical variability of the three brightest nearby quasars, 3C 273, PDS 456, and PHL 1811. All three have comparable absolute magnitudes, but PDS 456 and PHL 1811 are radio quiet. PDS 456 is a broad-line object, but PHL 1811 could be classified as a high-luminosity Narrow-Line Seyfert 1 (NLS1). Both of the radio-quiet quasars show significant variability on a timescale o…
▽ More
We report on the relative optical variability of the three brightest nearby quasars, 3C 273, PDS 456, and PHL 1811. All three have comparable absolute magnitudes, but PDS 456 and PHL 1811 are radio quiet. PDS 456 is a broad-line object, but PHL 1811 could be classified as a high-luminosity Narrow-Line Seyfert 1 (NLS1). Both of the radio-quiet quasars show significant variability on a timescale of a few days. The seasonal rms V-band variability amplitudes of 3C 273 and PDS 456 are indistinguishable, and the seasonal rms variability amplitude of PHL 1811 was only exceeded by 3C 273 once in 30 years of monitoring. We find no evidence that the optical variability of 3C 273 is greater than or more rapid than the variability of the comparably-bright, radio-quiet quasars. This suggests that not only do radio-loud and radio-quiet AGNs have similar spectral energy distributions, but that the variability mechanisms are also similar. The optical variability of 3C 273 is not dominated by a "blazer" component.
△ Less
Submitted 29 December, 2006;
originally announced January 2007.
Multiwavelength Monitoring of the Narrow-Line Seyfert 1 Galaxy Akn 564. III. Optical Observations and the Optical--UV--X-ray Connection
Authors:
O. Shemmer,
P. Romano,
R. Bertram,
W. Brinkmann,
S. Collier,
K. A. Crowley,
E. Detsis,
A. V. Filippenko,
C. M. Gaskell,
T. A. George,
M. Gliozzi,
M. E. Hiller,
T. L. Jewell,
S. Kaspi,
E. S. Klimek,
M. H. Lannon,
W. Li,
P. Martini,
S. Mathur,
H. Negoro,
H. Netzer,
I. Papadakis,
I. Papamastorakis,
B. M. Peterson,
B. W. Peterson
, et al. (14 additional authors not shown)
Abstract:
We present the results of a two-year long optical monitoring program of the narrow-line Seyfert 1 galaxy Akn 564. The majority of this monitoring project was also covered by X-ray observations (RXTE) and for a period of ~50 days, we observed the galaxy in UV (HST) and X-rays (RXTE & ASCA) simultaneously with the ground-based observations. Rapid and large-amplitude variations seen in the X-ray ba…
▽ More
We present the results of a two-year long optical monitoring program of the narrow-line Seyfert 1 galaxy Akn 564. The majority of this monitoring project was also covered by X-ray observations (RXTE) and for a period of ~50 days, we observed the galaxy in UV (HST) and X-rays (RXTE & ASCA) simultaneously with the ground-based observations. Rapid and large-amplitude variations seen in the X-ray band, on a daily and hourly time-scale, were not detected at optical and UV wavelengths, which in turn exhibited much lower variability either on short (one day) or long (several months) time-scales. The only significant optical variations can be described as two 2--4 day events with ~10% flux variations. We detect no significant optical line variations and thus cannot infer a reverberation size for the broad-line region. Similarly, the large X-ray variations seem to vanish when the light curve is smoothed over a period of 30 days. The UV continuum follows the X-rays with a lag of ~0.4 days, and the optical band lags the UV band by ~2 days. No significant correlation was found between the entire X-ray dataset and the optical band. Focusing on a 20-day interval around the strongest optical event we detect a significant X-ray--optical correlation with similar events seen in the UV and X-rays. Our data are consistent with reprocessing models on the grounds of the energy emitted in this single event. However, several large X-ray flares produced no corresponding optical emission.
△ Less
Submitted 4 July, 2001;
originally announced July 2001.
