Showing 1–4 of 4 results for author: Gadian, A

A case study investigation of summer temperature conditions at two coastal sites in the UK, and analysis of future temperatures and heat wave structures in a warming climate scenario

Authors: Alexandra Edey, Ralph Burton, Alan Gadian

Abstract: Using observations for two UK coastal sites <3 km from the sea, one on the West coast near the nuclear new build (NNB) site Hinkley Point C (HPC) and the other on the East coast, near the proposed NNB site Bradwell B (BRB), changes in surface two-metre temperatures are analysed. The output from a numerical model (WRF) experiment is used for a control period, 1990-1995, [Gadian et al. 2018] and for… ▽ More Using observations for two UK coastal sites <3 km from the sea, one on the West coast near the nuclear new build (NNB) site Hinkley Point C (HPC) and the other on the East coast, near the proposed NNB site Bradwell B (BRB), changes in surface two-metre temperatures are analysed. The output from a numerical model (WRF) experiment is used for a control period, 1990-1995, [Gadian et al. 2018] and for the period 2031-2036. The nested convective permitting model at a resolution of O(3km) is driven by a global channel model at a resolution of O(20km), enabling a more detailed comparison on the weather scale than is available with current climate models. Further, using the RCP8.5 warming scenario, the results are analysed. In the future scenario, there is an increase in the number of days where the summer (JJA) model temperatures exceed 25°C. There is a future warming of 1.2°C (BRB) and 1.1°C (HPC) in the mean JJA maximum daily temperatures compared with the control values and an average annual maximum daily temperature warming of 1.2°C (BRB) and 0.5°C (HPC). For the control period, the model under-predicts both the maximum and particularly the minimum temperatures. Results indicate there will be a >25% increase in the number of summer days when the maximum temperature exceeds 25°C, a 60% increase when the temperature exceeds the minimum of 13°C, (Tables 3, 4) and an increase in heat wave events per annum of greater than 10 days, [Gadian et al. 2018]. The increases in summer temperatures are larger than those predicted in the 2013 IPCC assessment [Collins et al 2013], but consistent with the maximum temperatures and increased number of hot days listed in UKCP18 [Met Office 2019(b)]. The higher resolution model results suggest that the IPCC report underestimates the increases in maximum temperatures at these locations. △ Less

Submitted 21 March, 2020; originally announced March 2020.

Comments: 24 Pages, 4 Figures, 4 Tables

Concurrent risks of dam failure due to internal degradation, strong winds, snow and drought

Authors: Chris Collier, Alan Gadian, Ralph Burton, James Groves

Abstract: The chance (or probability) of a dam failure can change for various reasons such as structural degradation, the impacts of climate change and land-use change. Similarly the consequences of dam failure (flooding) can change for many reasons such as growth in the population in areas below a dam. Consequently both the chance that a dam might fail and the likely consequences of that failure can change… ▽ More The chance (or probability) of a dam failure can change for various reasons such as structural degradation, the impacts of climate change and land-use change. Similarly the consequences of dam failure (flooding) can change for many reasons such as growth in the population in areas below a dam. Consequently both the chance that a dam might fail and the likely consequences of that failure can change over time. It is therefore crucial that reservoir safety risk analysis methods and decision-making processes are able to support (as a minimum) what-if testing (or sensitivity testing) to take into account these changes over time to gauge their effect on the estimated risk of dam failure. The consequences of a dam failure relate to the vulnerability and exposure of the receptors (for example, people, property and environment) to floodwater. Also the probability of dam failure varies with age, design and construction of the dam. Spillway failure may be caused by the dissipation of energy from water flowing down the spillway, and embankment erosion (scour) may be caused by a dam overtopping. The occurrence of these events depends upon the dam design and the likelihood of extreme rainfall, also in the case of overtopping wind-driven waves on the reservoir surface. In this study the meteorological situations of notable recent events i.e. the Boltby, North Yorkshire incident, 19 June 2005 in which the dam almost overtopped, and the spillway failure of the Ulley Dam near Rotherham at the end of June 2007, are studied. The WRF numerical model will be used to indicate how these meteorological situations might be maximized, and be coupled with the occurrence of other failure modes such as the likelihood of internal dam failure assessed from previous work by government panel engineers. △ Less

Submitted 31 May, 2017; originally announced June 2017.

The potential impact of turbulent velocity fluctuations on drizzle formation in Cumulus clouds in an idealized 2D setup

Authors: M. Andrejczuk, A. Gadian, A. Blyth

Abstract: This article discusses a potential impact of turbulent velocity fluctuations of the air on a drizzle formation in Cumulus clouds. Two different representations of turbulent velocity fluctuations for a microphysics formulated in a Lagrangian framework are discussed - random walk model and the interpolation, and its effect on microphysical properties of the cloud investigated. Turbulent velocity f… ▽ More This article discusses a potential impact of turbulent velocity fluctuations of the air on a drizzle formation in Cumulus clouds. Two different representations of turbulent velocity fluctuations for a microphysics formulated in a Lagrangian framework are discussed - random walk model and the interpolation, and its effect on microphysical properties of the cloud investigated. Turbulent velocity fluctuations significantly enhances velocity differences between colliding droplets, especially those having small sizes. As a result drizzle forms faster in simulations including a representation of turbulence. Both representations of turbulent velocity fluctuations, random walk and interpolation, have similar effect on droplet spectrum evolution, but interpolation of the velocity does account for a possible anisotropy in the air velocity. All discussed simulations show relatively large standard deviation ($\sim$1$μm$) of the cloud droplet distribution from the onset of cloud formation is observed. Because coalesence processes aerosol inside cloud droplets, detail information about aerosol is available. Results from numerical simulations show that changes in aerosol spectrum due to aerosol processing during droplet coalescence are relatively small during $\sim$20 min. of the cloud evolution simulated with numerical model. Drizzle forms initially near the cloud edge, either near the cloud top, where the mass of water is the largest, or near the entrainment eddies. △ Less

Submitted 4 September, 2015; originally announced September 2015.

Stratocumulus over SouthEast Pacific: Idealized 2D simulations with the Lagrangian Cloud Model

Authors: M. Andrejczuk, A. Gadian, A. Blyth

Abstract: In this paper a LES model with Lagrangian representation of microphysics is used to simulate stratucumulus clouds in idealized 2D set-up based on the VOCALS observations. The general features of the cloud simulated by the model, such as cloud water mixing ratio and cloud droplet number profile agree well with the observations. The model can capture observed relation between aerosol distribution an… ▽ More In this paper a LES model with Lagrangian representation of microphysics is used to simulate stratucumulus clouds in idealized 2D set-up based on the VOCALS observations. The general features of the cloud simulated by the model, such as cloud water mixing ratio and cloud droplet number profile agree well with the observations. The model can capture observed relation between aerosol distribution and concentration measured below the cloud and cloud droplet number. Averaged over the whole cloud droplet spectrum from the numerical model and observed droplet spectrum are similar, with the observations showing a higher concentration of droplets bigger than 25 μm. Much bigger differences are present when comparing modelled and observed droplet spectrum on specific model level. Despite the fact that microphysics is formulated in a Lagrangian framework the standard deviation of the cloud droplet distribution is larger than 1 μm. There is no significant narrowing of the cloud droplet distribution in the up-drafts, but the distribution in the up-drafts is narrower than in the down-drafts. Modelled and observed standard deviation profiles agree well with observations for moderate/high cloud droplet numbers, with much narrower than observed droplet spectrum for low droplet number. Model results show that a significant percentage of droplets containing aerosol bigger than 0.3 μm didn't reach activation radius, yet exceeding 1 μm, what is typically measured as a cloud droplets. Also, the relationship between aerosol sizes and cloud droplet sizes is complex; there is a broad range of possible cloud droplet sizes for a given aerosol size. △ Less

Submitted 1 November, 2012; originally announced November 2012.