Showing 1–5 of 5 results for author: Furia, F

Properties and Expressivity of Linear Geometric Centralities

Authors: Paolo Boldi, Flavio Furia, Chiara Prezioso

Abstract: Centrality indices are used to rank the nodes of a graph by importance: this is a common need in many concrete situations (social networks, citation networks, web graphs, for instance) and it was discussed many times in sociology, psychology, mathematics and computer science, giving rise to a whole zoo of definitions of centrality. Although they differ widely in nature, many centrality measures ar… ▽ More Centrality indices are used to rank the nodes of a graph by importance: this is a common need in many concrete situations (social networks, citation networks, web graphs, for instance) and it was discussed many times in sociology, psychology, mathematics and computer science, giving rise to a whole zoo of definitions of centrality. Although they differ widely in nature, many centrality measures are based on shortest-path distances: such centralities are often referred to as geometric. Geometric centralities can use the shortest-path-length information in many different ways, but most of the existing geometric centralities can be defined as a linear transformation of the distance-count vector (that is, the vector containing, for every index t, the number of nodes at distance t). In this paper we study this class of centralities, that we call linear (geometric) centralities, in their full generality. In particular, we look at them in the light of the axiomatic approach, and we study their expressivity: we show to what extent linear centralities can be used to distinguish between nodes in a graph, and how many different rankings of nodes can be induced by linear centralities on a given graph. The latter problem (which has a number of possible applications, especially in an adversarial setting) is solved by means of a linear programming formulation, which is based on Farkas' lemma, and is interesting in its own right. △ Less

Submitted 24 June, 2025; originally announced June 2025.

Game Theory in Formula 1: Multi-agent Physical and Strategical Interactions

Authors: Giona Fieni, Marc-Philippe Neumann, Francesca Furia, Alessandro Caucino, Alberto Cerofolini, Vittorio Ravaglioli, Christopher H. Onder

Abstract: This paper presents an optimization framework to model Formula 1 racing dynamics, where multiple cars interact physically and strategically. Aerodynamic wake effects, trajectory optimization, and energy management are integrated by means of physical models. We describe the minimum lap time problem with two agents as either a Nash or a Stackelberg game, and by employing the Karush-Kuhn-Tucker condi… ▽ More This paper presents an optimization framework to model Formula 1 racing dynamics, where multiple cars interact physically and strategically. Aerodynamic wake effects, trajectory optimization, and energy management are integrated by means of physical models. We describe the minimum lap time problem with two agents as either a Nash or a Stackelberg game, and by employing the Karush-Kuhn-Tucker conditions during the problem formulation, we recover the structure of a nonlinear program. In addition, we introduce an algorithm to refine local Stackelberg solutions, using the Nash costs as upper bounds. The resulting strategies are analyzed through case studies. We examine the impact of slipstreaming on trajectory selection in corners, straights, and high-speed sections, while also identifying optimal overtaking locations based on energy allocation strategies. Exploiting the structural similarities of the game formulations, we are able to compare symmetric and hierarchical strategies to analyze competitive racing dynamics. By incorporating a physically accurate interaction model and accounting for the optimal responses of competing agents, our approach reveals typical Formula 1 strategic behaviors. The proposed methodology closes the gap between theoretical game theory and real-world racing, with potential applications in motorsport engineering and autonomous racing. △ Less

Submitted 21 March, 2025; v1 submitted 7 March, 2025; originally announced March 2025.

Score and Rank Semi-Monotonicity for Closeness, Betweenness and Harmonic Centrality

Authors: Paolo Boldi, Davide D'Ascenzo, Flavio Furia, Sebastiano Vigna

Abstract: In the study of the behavior of centrality measures with respect to network modifications, score monotonicity means that adding an arc increases the centrality score of the target of the arc; rank monotonicity means that adding an arc improves the importance of the target of the arc relative to the remaining nodes. It is known that score and rank monotonicity hold in directed graphs for almost all… ▽ More In the study of the behavior of centrality measures with respect to network modifications, score monotonicity means that adding an arc increases the centrality score of the target of the arc; rank monotonicity means that adding an arc improves the importance of the target of the arc relative to the remaining nodes. It is known that score and rank monotonicity hold in directed graphs for almost all centrality measures. In undirected graphs one expects that the corresponding properties (where both endpoints of the new edge enjoy the increase in score/rank) hold when adding a new edge. However, recent results have shown that in undirected networks this is not true: for many centrality measures, it is possible to find situations where adding an edge reduces the rank of one of its two endpoints. In this paper we introduce a weaker condition for undirected networks, semi-monotonicity, in which just one of the endpoints of a new edge is required to enjoy score or rank monotonicity. We show that this condition is satisfied by closeness and betweenness centrality, and that harmonic centrality satisfies it in an even stronger sense. △ Less

Submitted 29 November, 2023; v1 submitted 1 September, 2023; originally announced September 2023.

Monotonicity in Undirected Networks

Authors: Paolo Boldi, Flavio Furia, Sebastiano Vigna

Abstract: Is it always beneficial to create a new relationship (have a new follower/friend) in a social network? This question can be formally stated as a property of the centrality measure that defines the importance of the actors of the network. Score monotonicity means that adding an arc increases the centrality score of the target of the arc; rank monotonicity means that adding an arc improves the impor… ▽ More Is it always beneficial to create a new relationship (have a new follower/friend) in a social network? This question can be formally stated as a property of the centrality measure that defines the importance of the actors of the network. Score monotonicity means that adding an arc increases the centrality score of the target of the arc; rank monotonicity means that adding an arc improves the importance of the target of the arc relatively to the remaining nodes. It is known that most centralities are both score and rank monotone on directed, strongly connected graphs. In this paper, we study the problem of score and rank monotonicity for classical centrality measures in the case of undirected networks: in this case, we require that score, or relative importance, improve at both endpoints of the new edge. We show that, surprisingly, the situation in the undirected case is very different, and in particular that closeness, harmonic centrality, betweenness, eigenvector centrality, Seeley's index, Katz's index, and PageRank are not rank monotone; betweenness and PageRank are not even score monotone. In other words, while it is always a good thing to get a new follower, it is not always beneficial to get a new friend. △ Less

Submitted 13 July, 2022; originally announced July 2022.

Comments: arXiv admin note: text overlap with arXiv:2202.01044

Spectral Rank Monotonicity on Undirected Networks

Authors: Paolo Boldi, Flavio Furia, Sebastiano Vigna

Abstract: We study the problem of score and rank monotonicity for spectral ranking methods, such as eigenvector centrality and PageRank, in the case of undirected networks. Score monotonicity means that adding an edge increases the score at both ends of the edge. Rank monotonicity means that adding an edge improves the relative position of both ends of the edge with respect to the remaining nodes. It is kno… ▽ More We study the problem of score and rank monotonicity for spectral ranking methods, such as eigenvector centrality and PageRank, in the case of undirected networks. Score monotonicity means that adding an edge increases the score at both ends of the edge. Rank monotonicity means that adding an edge improves the relative position of both ends of the edge with respect to the remaining nodes. It is known that common spectral rankings are both score and rank monotone on directed, strongly connected graphs. We show that, surprisingly, the situation is very different for undirected graphs, and in particular that PageRank is neither score nor rank monotone. △ Less

Submitted 2 February, 2022; originally announced February 2022.