Skip to main content

Showing 1–8 of 8 results for author: Franks, B J

.
  1. arXiv:2412.07407  [pdf, other

    cs.LG

    Towards Graph Foundation Models: A Study on the Generalization of Positional and Structural Encodings

    Authors: Billy Joe Franks, Moshe Eliasof, Semih Cantürk, Guy Wolf, Carola-Bibiane Schönlieb, Sophie Fellenz, Marius Kloft

    Abstract: Recent advances in integrating positional and structural encodings (PSEs) into graph neural networks (GNNs) have significantly enhanced their performance across various graph learning tasks. However, the general applicability of these encodings and their potential to serve as foundational representations for graphs remain uncertain. This paper investigates the fine-tuning efficiency, scalability w… ▽ More

    Submitted 3 March, 2025; v1 submitted 10 December, 2024; originally announced December 2024.

    Comments: Published at TMLR (https://openreview.net/forum?id=mSoDRZXsqj)

  2. arXiv:2402.07568  [pdf, other

    cs.LG cs.DM cs.NE stat.ML

    Weisfeiler-Leman at the margin: When more expressivity matters

    Authors: Billy J. Franks, Christopher Morris, Ameya Velingker, Floris Geerts

    Abstract: The Weisfeiler-Leman algorithm ($1$-WL) is a well-studied heuristic for the graph isomorphism problem. Recently, the algorithm has played a prominent role in understanding the expressive power of message-passing graph neural networks (MPNNs) and being effective as a graph kernel. Despite its success, $1$-WL faces challenges in distinguishing non-isomorphic graphs, leading to the development of mor… ▽ More

    Submitted 28 May, 2024; v1 submitted 12 February, 2024; originally announced February 2024.

    Comments: Accepted at ICML 2024. arXiv admin note: text overlap with arXiv:2301.11039

  3. arXiv:2303.05904  [pdf, ps, other

    cs.LG

    Deep Anomaly Detection on Tennessee Eastman Process Data

    Authors: Fabian Hartung, Billy Joe Franks, Tobias Michels, Dennis Wagner, Philipp Liznerski, Steffen Reithermann, Sophie Fellenz, Fabian Jirasek, Maja Rudolph, Daniel Neider, Heike Leitte, Chen Song, Benjamin Kloepper, Stephan Mandt, Michael Bortz, Jakob Burger, Hans Hasse, Marius Kloft

    Abstract: This paper provides the first comprehensive evaluation and analysis of modern (deep-learning) unsupervised anomaly detection methods for chemical process data. We focus on the Tennessee Eastman process dataset, which has been a standard litmus test to benchmark anomaly detection methods for nearly three decades. Our extensive study will facilitate choosing appropriate anomaly detection methods in… ▽ More

    Submitted 10 March, 2023; originally announced March 2023.

  4. arXiv:2301.09485  [pdf, other

    cs.LG

    Ordinal Regression for Difficulty Estimation of StepMania Levels

    Authors: Billy Joe Franks, Benjamin Dinkelmann, Sophie Fellenz, Marius Kloft

    Abstract: StepMania is a popular open-source clone of a rhythm-based video game. As is common in popular games, there is a large number of community-designed levels. It is often difficult for players and level authors to determine the difficulty level of such community contributions. In this work, we formalize and analyze the difficulty prediction task on StepMania levels as an ordinal regression (OR) task.… ▽ More

    Submitted 23 January, 2023; originally announced January 2023.

  5. arXiv:2205.11474  [pdf, other

    cs.CV cs.LG stat.ML

    Exposing Outlier Exposure: What Can Be Learned From Few, One, and Zero Outlier Images

    Authors: Philipp Liznerski, Lukas Ruff, Robert A. Vandermeulen, Billy Joe Franks, Klaus-Robert Müller, Marius Kloft

    Abstract: Due to the intractability of characterizing everything that looks unlike the normal data, anomaly detection (AD) is traditionally treated as an unsupervised problem utilizing only normal samples. However, it has recently been found that unsupervised image AD can be drastically improved through the utilization of huge corpora of random images to represent anomalousness; a technique which is known a… ▽ More

    Submitted 14 November, 2022; v1 submitted 23 May, 2022; originally announced May 2022.

    Comments: 47 pages; extended experiments; published in Transactions on Machine Learning Research. arXiv admin note: substantial text overlap with arXiv:2006.00339

  6. arXiv:2112.04314  [pdf, ps, other

    cs.LG cs.AI stat.ML

    A systematic approach to random data augmentation on graph neural networks

    Authors: Billy Joe Franks, Markus Anders, Marius Kloft, Pascal Schweitzer

    Abstract: Random data augmentations (RDAs) are state of the art regarding practical graph neural networks that are provably universal. There is great diversity regarding terminology, methodology, benchmarks, and evaluation metrics used among existing RDAs. Not only does this make it increasingly difficult for practitioners to decide which technique to apply to a given problem, but it also stands in the way… ▽ More

    Submitted 21 March, 2022; v1 submitted 8 December, 2021; originally announced December 2021.

  7. arXiv:2007.01760  [pdf, other

    cs.CV cs.LG stat.ML

    Explainable Deep One-Class Classification

    Authors: Philipp Liznerski, Lukas Ruff, Robert A. Vandermeulen, Billy Joe Franks, Marius Kloft, Klaus-Robert Müller

    Abstract: Deep one-class classification variants for anomaly detection learn a mapping that concentrates nominal samples in feature space causing anomalies to be mapped away. Because this transformation is highly non-linear, finding interpretations poses a significant challenge. In this paper we present an explainable deep one-class classification method, Fully Convolutional Data Description (FCDD), where t… ▽ More

    Submitted 18 March, 2021; v1 submitted 3 July, 2020; originally announced July 2020.

    Comments: 25 pages, published as a conference paper at ICLR 2021

  8. arXiv:2006.00339  [pdf, other

    cs.LG stat.ML

    Rethinking Assumptions in Deep Anomaly Detection

    Authors: Lukas Ruff, Robert A. Vandermeulen, Billy Joe Franks, Klaus-Robert Müller, Marius Kloft

    Abstract: Though anomaly detection (AD) can be viewed as a classification problem (nominal vs. anomalous) it is usually treated in an unsupervised manner since one typically does not have access to, or it is infeasible to utilize, a dataset that sufficiently characterizes what it means to be "anomalous." In this paper we present results demonstrating that this intuition surprisingly seems not to extend to d… ▽ More

    Submitted 27 January, 2023; v1 submitted 30 May, 2020; originally announced June 2020.

    Comments: 17 pages; accepted at the ICML 2021 Workshop on Uncertainty & Robustness in Deep Learning; An extended Journal paper of this work has been published in Transactions on Machine Learning Research: arXiv:2205.11474