-
Semi-orthogonal subspaces for value mediate a tradeoff between binding and generalization
Authors:
W. Jeffrey Johnston,
Justin M. Fine,
Seng Bum Michael Yoo,
R. Becket Ebitz,
Benjamin Y. Hayden
Abstract:
When choosing between options, we must associate their values with the action needed to select them. We hypothesize that the brain solves this binding problem through neural population subspaces. To test this hypothesis, we examined neuronal responses in five reward-sensitive regions in macaques performing a risky choice task with sequential offers. Surprisingly, in all areas, the neural populatio…
▽ More
When choosing between options, we must associate their values with the action needed to select them. We hypothesize that the brain solves this binding problem through neural population subspaces. To test this hypothesis, we examined neuronal responses in five reward-sensitive regions in macaques performing a risky choice task with sequential offers. Surprisingly, in all areas, the neural population encoded the values of offers presented on the left and right in distinct subspaces. We show that the encoding we observe is sufficient to bind the values of the offers to their respective positions in space while preserving abstract value information, which may be important for rapid learning and generalization to novel contexts. Moreover, after both offers have been presented, all areas encode the value of the first and second offers in orthogonal subspaces. In this case as well, the orthogonalization provides binding. Our binding-by-subspace hypothesis makes two novel predictions borne out by the data. First, behavioral errors should correlate with putative spatial (but not temporal) misbinding in the neural representation. Second, the specific representational geometry that we observe across animals also indicates that behavioral errors should increase when offers have low or high values, compared to when they have medium values, even when controlling for value difference. Together, these results support the idea that the brain makes use of semi-orthogonal subspaces to bind features together.
△ Less
Submitted 14 September, 2023;
originally announced September 2023.
-
Subspace orthogonalization as a mechanism for binding values to space
Authors:
W. Jeffrey Johnston,
Justin M. Fine,
Seng Bum Michael Yoo,
R. Becket Ebitz,
Benjamin Y. Hayden
Abstract:
When choosing between options, we must solve an important binding problem. The values of the options must be associated with information about the action needed to select them. We hypothesize that the brain solves this binding problem through use of distinct population subspaces. To test this hypothesis, we examined the responses of single neurons in five reward-sensitive regions in rhesus macaque…
▽ More
When choosing between options, we must solve an important binding problem. The values of the options must be associated with information about the action needed to select them. We hypothesize that the brain solves this binding problem through use of distinct population subspaces. To test this hypothesis, we examined the responses of single neurons in five reward-sensitive regions in rhesus macaques performing a risky choice task. In all areas, neurons encoded the value of the offers presented on both the left and the right side of the display in semi-orthogonal subspaces, which served to bind the values of the two offers to their positions in space. Supporting the idea that this orthogonalization is functionally meaningful, we observed a session-to-session covariation between choice behavior and the orthogonalization of the two value subspaces: trials with less orthogonalized subspaces were associated with greater likelihood of choosing the less valued option. Further inspection revealed that these semi-orthogonal subspaces arose from a combination of linear and nonlinear mixed selectivity in the neural population. We show this combination of selectivity balances reliable binding with an ability to generalize value across different spatial locations. These results support the hypothesis that semi-orthogonal subspaces support reliable binding, which is essential to flexible behavior in the face of multiple options.
△ Less
Submitted 2 February, 2023; v1 submitted 13 May, 2022;
originally announced May 2022.
-
The whole prefrontal cortex is premotor cortex
Authors:
Justin M. Fine,
Benjamin Y. Hayden
Abstract:
We propose that the entirety of the prefrontal cortex can be seen as fundamentally premotor in nature. By this, we mean that the prefrontal cortex consists of an action abstraction hierarchy whose core function is the potentiation and depotentiation of possible action plans at different levels of granularity. We argue that the apex of the hierarchy should revolve around the process of goal selecti…
▽ More
We propose that the entirety of the prefrontal cortex can be seen as fundamentally premotor in nature. By this, we mean that the prefrontal cortex consists of an action abstraction hierarchy whose core function is the potentiation and depotentiation of possible action plans at different levels of granularity. We argue that the apex of the hierarchy should revolve around the process of goal selection, which we posit is inherently a form of abstract action optimization. Anatomical and functional evidence supports the idea that this hierarchy originates on the orbital surface of the brain and extends dorsally to motor cortex. Our view, therefore, positions the orbitofrontal cortex as the central site for the optimization of goal selection policies, and suggests that other proposed roles are aspects of this more general function. We conclude by proposing that the dynamical systems approach, which works well in motor systems, can be extended to the rest of prefrontal cortex. Our proposed perspective will reframe outstanding questions, open up new areas of inquiry, and will align theories of prefrontal function with evolutionary principles.
△ Less
Submitted 8 June, 2021;
originally announced June 2021.
