Large Process Models: A Vision for Business Process Management in the Age of Generative AI
Authors:
Timotheus Kampik,
Christian Warmuth,
Adrian Rebmann,
Ron Agam,
Lukas N. P. Egger,
Andreas Gerber,
Johannes Hoffart,
Jonas Kolk,
Philipp Herzig,
Gero Decker,
Han van der Aa,
Artem Polyvyanyy,
Stefanie Rinderle-Ma,
Ingo Weber,
Matthias Weidlich
Abstract:
The continued success of Large Language Models (LLMs) and other generative artificial intelligence approaches highlights the advantages that large information corpora can have over rigidly defined symbolic models, but also serves as a proof-point of the challenges that purely statistics-based approaches have in terms of safety and trustworthiness. As a framework for contextualizing the potential,…
▽ More
The continued success of Large Language Models (LLMs) and other generative artificial intelligence approaches highlights the advantages that large information corpora can have over rigidly defined symbolic models, but also serves as a proof-point of the challenges that purely statistics-based approaches have in terms of safety and trustworthiness. As a framework for contextualizing the potential, as well as the limitations of LLMs and other foundation model-based technologies, we propose the concept of a Large Process Model (LPM) that combines the correlation power of LLMs with the analytical precision and reliability of knowledge-based systems and automated reasoning approaches. LPMs are envisioned to directly utilize the wealth of process management experience that experts have accumulated, as well as process performance data of organizations with diverse characteristics, e.g.,\ regarding size, region, or industry. In this vision, the proposed LPM would allow organizations to receive context-specific (tailored) process and other business models, analytical deep-dives, and improvement recommendations. As such, they would allow to substantially decrease the time and effort required for business transformation, while also allowing for deeper, more impactful, and more actionable insights than previously possible. We argue that implementing an LPM is feasible, but also highlight limitations and research challenges that need to be solved to implement particular aspects of the LPM vision.
△ Less
Submitted 17 January, 2025; v1 submitted 2 September, 2023;
originally announced September 2023.
