Exploring the Neptunian Desert: Insights from a Homogeneous Planetary Sample
Authors:
Lauren Doyle,
David J. Armstrong,
Lorena Acuña,
Ares Osborn,
Sérgio A. G. Sousa,
Amadeo Castro-González,
Vincent Bourrier,
Douglas Alves,
David Barrado,
Susana C. C. Barros,
Daniel Bayliss,
Kaiming Cui,
Olivier Demangeon,
Rodrigo F. Díaz,
Xavier Dumusque,
Fintan Eeles-Nolle,
Samuel Gill,
Alejandro Hacker,
James S. Jenkins,
Marcelo Aron Fetzner Keniger,
Marina Lafarga,
Jorge Lillo-Box,
Isobel Lockley,
Louise D. Nielsen,
Léna Parc
, et al. (4 additional authors not shown)
Abstract:
In this paper, we present a homogeneous analysis of close-in Neptune planets. To do this, we compile a sample of TESS-observed planets using a ranking criterion which takes into account the planet's period, radius, and the visual magnitude of its host star. We use archival and new HARPS data to ensure every target in this sample has precise radial velocities. This yields a total of 64 targets, 46…
▽ More
In this paper, we present a homogeneous analysis of close-in Neptune planets. To do this, we compile a sample of TESS-observed planets using a ranking criterion which takes into account the planet's period, radius, and the visual magnitude of its host star. We use archival and new HARPS data to ensure every target in this sample has precise radial velocities. This yields a total of 64 targets, 46 of which are confirmed planets and 18 of which show no significant radial velocity signal. We explore the mass-radius distribution, planetary density, stellar host metallicity, and stellar and planetary companions of our targets. We find 26$\%$ of our sample are in multi-planet systems, which are typically seen for planets located near the lower edge of the Neptunian desert. We define a 'gold' subset of our sample consisting of 33 confirmed planets with planetary radii between 2$R_{\oplus}$ and 10$R_{\oplus}$. With these targets, we calculate envelope mass fractions (EMF) using the GAS gianT modeL for Interiors (GASTLI). We find a clear split in EMF between planets with equilibrium temperatures below and above 1300~K, equivalent to an orbital period of $\sim$3.5~days. Below this period, EMFs are consistent with zero, while above they typically range from 20$\%$ to 40$\%$, scaling linearly with the planetary mass. The orbital period separating these two populations coincides with the transition between the Neptunian desert and the recently identified Neptunian ridge, further suggesting that different formation and/or evolution mechanisms are at play for Neptune planets across different close-in orbital regions.
△ Less
Submitted 22 April, 2025;
originally announced April 2025.
