Showing 1–12 of 12 results for author: Daviaud, L

Feasability of Learning Weighted Automata on a Semiring

Authors: Laure Daviaud, Marianne Johnson

Abstract: Since the seminal work by Angluin and the introduction of the L*-algorithm, active learning of automata by membership and equivalence queries has been extensively studied to learn various extensions of automata. For weighted automata, algorithms for restricted cases have been developed in the literature, but so far there was no global approach or understanding how these algorithms could apply (or… ▽ More Since the seminal work by Angluin and the introduction of the L*-algorithm, active learning of automata by membership and equivalence queries has been extensively studied to learn various extensions of automata. For weighted automata, algorithms for restricted cases have been developed in the literature, but so far there was no global approach or understanding how these algorithms could apply (or not) in the general case. In this paper we chart the boundaries of the Angluin approach. We use a class of hypothesis automata which are constructed, in Angluin's style, by using membership and equivalence queries and solving certain finite systems of linear equations over the semiring, and we show the theoretical limitations of this approach. We classify functions with respect to how guessable they are, corresponding to the existence of hypothesis automata computing a given function, and how such an hypothesis automaton can be found. Of course, from an algorithmic standpoint, knowing that a solution (hypothesis automaton) exists need not translate into an effective algorithm to find one. We relate our work to the existing literature with a discussion of some known properties ensuring algorithmic solutions, illustrating the ideas over several familiar semirings (including the natural numbers). △ Less

Submitted 27 January, 2025; v1 submitted 14 September, 2023; originally announced September 2023.

The Big-O Problem for Max-Plus Automata is Decidable (PSPACE-Complete)

Authors: Laure Daviaud, David Purser, Marie Tcheng

Abstract: We show that the big-O problem for max-plus automata is decidable and PSPACE-complete. The big-O (or affine domination) problem asks whether, given two max-plus automata computing functions f and g, there exists a constant c such that f < cg+ c. This is a relaxation of the containment problem asking whether f < g, which is undecidable. Our decidability result uses Simon's forest factorisation theo… ▽ More We show that the big-O problem for max-plus automata is decidable and PSPACE-complete. The big-O (or affine domination) problem asks whether, given two max-plus automata computing functions f and g, there exists a constant c such that f < cg+ c. This is a relaxation of the containment problem asking whether f < g, which is undecidable. Our decidability result uses Simon's forest factorisation theorem, and relies on detecting specific elements, that we call witnesses, in a finite semigroup closed under two special operations: stabilisation and flattening. △ Less

Submitted 10 April, 2025; v1 submitted 11 April, 2023; originally announced April 2023.

Comments: Version 2: adds section on Max-Plus automata with increasingly complex witnesses

The Strahler number of a parity game

Authors: Laure Daviaud, Marcin Jurdziński, K. S. Thejaswini

Abstract: The Strahler number of a rooted tree is the largest height of a perfect binary tree that is its minor. The Strahler number of a parity game is proposed to be defined as the smallest Strahler number of the tree of any of its attractor decompositions. It is proved that parity games can be solved in quasi-linear space and in time that is polynomial in the number of vertices~$n$ and linear in… ▽ More The Strahler number of a rooted tree is the largest height of a perfect binary tree that is its minor. The Strahler number of a parity game is proposed to be defined as the smallest Strahler number of the tree of any of its attractor decompositions. It is proved that parity games can be solved in quasi-linear space and in time that is polynomial in the number of vertices~$n$ and linear in $({d}/{2k})^k$, where $d$ is the number of priorities and $k$ is the Strahler number. This complexity is quasi-polynomial because the Strahler number is at most logarithmic in the number of vertices. The proof is based on a new construction of small Strahler-universal trees. It is shown that the Strahler number of a parity game is a robust parameter: it coincides with its alternative version based on trees of progress measures and with the register number defined by Lehtinen~(2018). It follows that parity games can be solved in quasi-linear space and in time that is polynomial in the number of vertices and linear in $({d}/{2k})^k$, where $k$ is the register number. This significantly improves the running times and space achieved for parity games of bounded register number by Lehtinen (2018) and by Parys (2020). The running time of the algorithm based on small Strahler-universal trees yields a novel trade-off $k \cdot \lg(d/k) = O(\log n)$ between the two natural parameters that measure the structural complexity of a parity game, which allows solving parity games in polynomial time. This includes as special cases the asymptotic settings of those parameters covered by the results of Calude, Jain Khoussainov, Li, and Stephan (2017), of Jurdziński and Lazić (2017), and of Lehtinen (2018), and it significantly extends the range of such settings, for example to $d = 2^{O\left(\sqrt{\lg n}\right)}$ and $k = O\!\left(\sqrt{\lg n}\right)$. △ Less

Submitted 4 May, 2020; v1 submitted 19 March, 2020; originally announced March 2020.

Comments: To appear in ICALP 2020

Alternating Weak Automata from Universal Trees

Authors: Laure Daviaud, Marcin Jurdziński, Karoliina Lehtinen

Abstract: An improved translation from alternating parity automata on infinite words to alternating weak automata is given. The blow-up of the number of states is related to the size of the smallest universal ordered trees and hence it is quasi-polynomial, and only polynomial if the asymptotic number of priorities is logarithmic in the number of states. This is an exponential improvement on the translation… ▽ More An improved translation from alternating parity automata on infinite words to alternating weak automata is given. The blow-up of the number of states is related to the size of the smallest universal ordered trees and hence it is quasi-polynomial, and only polynomial if the asymptotic number of priorities is logarithmic in the number of states. This is an exponential improvement on the translation of Kupferman and Vardi (2001) and a quasi-polynomial improvement on the translation of Boker and Lehtinen (2018). Any slightly better such translation would (if---like all presently known such translations---it is efficiently constructive) lead to algorithms for solving parity games that are asymptotically faster in the worst case than the current state of the art (Calude, Jain, Khoussainov, Li, and Stephan, 2017; Jurdziński and Lazić, 2017; and Fearnley, Jain, Schewe, Stephan, and Wojtczak, 2017), and hence it would yield a significant breakthrough. △ Less

Submitted 4 July, 2019; v1 submitted 29 March, 2019; originally announced March 2019.

Universal trees grow inside separating automata: Quasi-polynomial lower bounds for parity games

Authors: Wojciech Czerwiński, Laure Daviaud, Nathanaël Fijalkow, Marcin Jurdziński, Ranko Lazić, Paweł Parys

Abstract: Several distinct techniques have been proposed to design quasi-polynomial algorithms for solving parity games since the breakthrough result of Calude, Jain, Khoussainov, Li, and Stephan (2017): play summaries, progress measures and register games. We argue that all those techniques can be viewed as instances of the separation approach to solving parity games, a key technical component of which is… ▽ More Several distinct techniques have been proposed to design quasi-polynomial algorithms for solving parity games since the breakthrough result of Calude, Jain, Khoussainov, Li, and Stephan (2017): play summaries, progress measures and register games. We argue that all those techniques can be viewed as instances of the separation approach to solving parity games, a key technical component of which is constructing (explicitly or implicitly) an automaton that separates languages of words encoding plays that are (decisively) won by either of the two players. Our main technical result is a quasi-polynomial lower bound on the size of such separating automata that nearly matches the current best upper bounds. This forms a barrier that all existing approaches must overcome in the ongoing quest for a polynomial-time algorithm for solving parity games. The key and fundamental concept that we introduce and study is a universal ordered tree. The technical highlights are a quasi-polynomial lower bound on the size of universal ordered trees and a proof that every separating safety automaton has a universal tree hidden in its state space. △ Less

Submitted 2 November, 2018; v1 submitted 27 July, 2018; originally announced July 2018.

Comments: To appear in SODA 2019

Undecidability of a weak version of MSO+U

Authors: Mikołaj Bojańczyk, Laure Daviaud, Bruno Guillon, Vincent Penelle, A. V. Sreejith

Abstract: We prove the undecidability of MSO on $ω$-words extended with the second-order predicate $U_1(X)$ which says that the distance between consecutive positions in a set $X \subseteq \mathbb{N}$ is unbounded. This is achieved by showing that adding $U_1$ to MSO gives a logic with the same expressive power as $MSO+U$, a logic on $ω$-words with undecidable satisfiability. As a corollary, we prove that M… ▽ More We prove the undecidability of MSO on $ω$-words extended with the second-order predicate $U_1(X)$ which says that the distance between consecutive positions in a set $X \subseteq \mathbb{N}$ is unbounded. This is achieved by showing that adding $U_1$ to MSO gives a logic with the same expressive power as $MSO+U$, a logic on $ω$-words with undecidable satisfiability. As a corollary, we prove that MSO on $ω$-words becomes undecidable if allowing to quantify over sets of positions that are ultimately periodic, i.e., sets $X$ such that for some positive integer $p$, ultimately either both or none of positions $x$ and $x+p$ belong to $X$. △ Less

Submitted 10 February, 2020; v1 submitted 23 July, 2018; originally announced July 2018.

Journal ref: Logical Methods in Computer Science, Volume 16, Issue 1 (February 11, 2020) lmcs:5059

When is Containment Decidable for Probabilistic Automata?

Authors: Laure Daviaud, Marcin Jurdziński, Ranko Lazić, Filip Mazowiecki, Guillermo A. Pérez, James Worrell

Abstract: The emptiness and containment problems for probabilistic automata are natural quantitative generalisations of the classical language emptiness and inclusion problems for Boolean automata. It is well known that both problems are undecidable. In this paper we provide a more refined view of these problems in terms of the degree of ambiguity of probabilistic automata. We show that a gap version of the… ▽ More The emptiness and containment problems for probabilistic automata are natural quantitative generalisations of the classical language emptiness and inclusion problems for Boolean automata. It is well known that both problems are undecidable. In this paper we provide a more refined view of these problems in terms of the degree of ambiguity of probabilistic automata. We show that a gap version of the emptiness problem (that is known be undecidable in general) becomes decidable for automata of polynomial ambiguity. We complement this positive result by showing that the emptiness problem remains undecidable even when restricted to automata of linear ambiguity. We then turn to finitely ambiguous automata. Here we show decidability of containment in case one of the automata is assumed to be unambiguous while the other one is allowed to be finitely ambiguous. Our proof of this last result relies on the decidability of the theory of real exponentiation, which has been shown, subject to Schanuel's Conjecture, by Macintyre and Wilkie. △ Less

Submitted 29 March, 2020; v1 submitted 24 April, 2018; originally announced April 2018.

ACM Class: F.3.1

Regular and First Order List Functions

Authors: Mikolaj Bojanczyk, Laure Daviaud, Krishna Shankara Narayanan

Abstract: We define two classes of functions, called regular (respectively, first-order) list functions, which manipulate objects such as lists, lists of lists, pairs of lists, lists of pairs of lists, etc. The definition is in the style of regular expressions: the functions are constructed by starting with some basic functions (e.g. projections from pairs, or head and tail operations on lists) and putting… ▽ More We define two classes of functions, called regular (respectively, first-order) list functions, which manipulate objects such as lists, lists of lists, pairs of lists, lists of pairs of lists, etc. The definition is in the style of regular expressions: the functions are constructed by starting with some basic functions (e.g. projections from pairs, or head and tail operations on lists) and putting them together using four combinators (most importantly, composition of functions). Our main results are that first-order list functions are exactly the same as first-order transductions, under a suitable encoding of the inputs; and the regular list functions are exactly the same as MSO-transductions. △ Less

Submitted 16 March, 2018; originally announced March 2018.

A pseudo-quasi-polynomial algorithm for solving mean-payoff parity games

Authors: Laure Daviaud, Marcin Jurdzinski, Ranko Lazic

Abstract: In a mean-payoff parity game, one of the two players aims both to achieve a qualitative parity objective and to minimize a quantitative long-term average of payoffs (aka. mean payoff). The game is zero-sum and hence the aim of the other player is to either foil the parity objective or to maximize the mean payoff. Our main technical result is a pseudo-quasi-polynomial algorithm for solving mean-p… ▽ More In a mean-payoff parity game, one of the two players aims both to achieve a qualitative parity objective and to minimize a quantitative long-term average of payoffs (aka. mean payoff). The game is zero-sum and hence the aim of the other player is to either foil the parity objective or to maximize the mean payoff. Our main technical result is a pseudo-quasi-polynomial algorithm for solving mean-payoff parity games. All algorithms for the problem that have been developed for over a decade have a pseudo-polynomial and an exponential factors in their running times; in the running time of our algorithm the latter is replaced with a quasi-polynomial one. By the results of Chatterjee and Doyen (2012) and of Schewe, Weinert, and Zimmermann (2018), our main technical result implies that there are pseudo-quasi-polynomial algorithms for solving parity energy games and for solving parity games with weights. Our main conceptual contributions are the definitions of strategy decompositions for both players, and a notion of progress measures for mean-payoff parity games that generalizes both parity and energy progress measures. The former provides normal forms for and succinct representations of winning strategies, and the latter enables the application to mean-payoff parity games of the order-theoretic machinery that underpins a recent quasi-polynomial algorithm for solving parity games. △ Less

Submitted 10 July, 2018; v1 submitted 13 March, 2018; originally announced March 2018.

Degree of sequentiality of weighted automata

Authors: Laure Daviaud, Ismael Jecker, Pierre-Alain Reynier, Didier Villevalois

Abstract: Weighted automata (WA) are an important formalism to describe quantitative properties. Obtaining equivalent deterministic machines is a longstanding research problem. In this paper we consider WA with a set semantics, meaning that the semantics is given by the set of weights of accepting runs. We focus on multi-sequential WA that are defined as finite unions of sequential WA. The problem we addres… ▽ More Weighted automata (WA) are an important formalism to describe quantitative properties. Obtaining equivalent deterministic machines is a longstanding research problem. In this paper we consider WA with a set semantics, meaning that the semantics is given by the set of weights of accepting runs. We focus on multi-sequential WA that are defined as finite unions of sequential WA. The problem we address is to minimize the size of this union. We call this minimum the degree of sequentiality of (the relation realized by) the WA. For a given positive integer k, we provide multiple characterizations of relations realized by a union of k sequential WA over an infinitary finitely generated group: a Lipschitz-like machine independent property, a pattern on the automaton (a new twinning property) and a subclass of cost register automata. When possible, we effectively translate a WA into an equivalent union of k sequential WA. We also provide a decision procedure for our twinning property for commutative computable groups thus allowing to compute the degree of sequentiality. Last, we show that these results also hold for word transducers and that the associated decision problem is Pspace-complete. △ Less

Submitted 17 January, 2017; originally announced January 2017.

Comments: 35 pages

Identities in Upper Triangular Tropical Matrix Semigroups and the Bicyclic Monoid

Authors: Laure Daviaud, Marianne Johnson, Mark Kambites

Abstract: We establish necessary and sufficient conditions for a semigroup identity to hold in the monoid of $n\times n$ upper triangular tropical matrices, in terms of equivalence of certain tropical polynomials. This leads to an algorithm for checking whether such an identity holds, in time polynomial in the length of the identity and size of the alphabet. It also allows us to answer a question of Izhakia… ▽ More We establish necessary and sufficient conditions for a semigroup identity to hold in the monoid of $n\times n$ upper triangular tropical matrices, in terms of equivalence of certain tropical polynomials. This leads to an algorithm for checking whether such an identity holds, in time polynomial in the length of the identity and size of the alphabet. It also allows us to answer a question of Izhakian and Margolis, by showing that the identities which hold in the monoid of $2\times 2$ upper triangular tropical matrices are exactly the same as those which hold in the bicyclic monoid. Our results extend to a broader class of "chain structured tropical matrix semigroups"; we exhibit a faithful representation of the free monogenic inverse semigroup within such a semigroup, which leads also to a representation by $3\times 3$ upper triangular matrix semigroups, and a new proof of the fact that this semigroup satisfies the same identities as the bicyclic monoid. △ Less

Submitted 6 April, 2020; v1 submitted 13 December, 2016; originally announced December 2016.

Comments: 21 pages. This amended version of the author accepted manuscript contains a corrected proof of Proposition 7.1. The new proof establishes the proposition exactly as originally published, all other results are unaffected and the manuscript is otherwise unamended

MSC Class: 20M07; 20M20; 15A80

Comparison of max-plus automata and joint spectral radius of tropical matrices

Authors: Laure Daviaud, Pierre Guillon, Glenn Merlet

Abstract: Weighted automata over the max-plus semiring S are closely related to finitely generated semigroups of matrices over S. In this paper, we use results in automata theory to study two quantities associated with sets of matrices: the joint spectral radius and the ultimate rank. We prove that these two quantities are not computable over the tropical semiring, i.e. there is no algorithm that takes as i… ▽ More Weighted automata over the max-plus semiring S are closely related to finitely generated semigroups of matrices over S. In this paper, we use results in automata theory to study two quantities associated with sets of matrices: the joint spectral radius and the ultimate rank. We prove that these two quantities are not computable over the tropical semiring, i.e. there is no algorithm that takes as input a finite set of matrices M and provides as output the joint spectral radius (resp. the ultimate rank) of M. On the other hand, we prove that the joint spectral radius is nevertheless approximable and we exhibit restricted cases in which the joint spectral radius and the ultimate rank are computable. To reach this aim, we study the problem of comparing functions computed by weighted automata over the tropical semiring. This problem is known to be undecidable and we prove that it remains undecidable in some specific subclasses of automata. △ Less

Submitted 3 March, 2017; v1 submitted 8 December, 2016; originally announced December 2016.